基于脑电图信号的神经网络鉴别诊断认知障碍方法:系统综述

Samaneh Fouladi, A. Safaei
{"title":"基于脑电图信号的神经网络鉴别诊断认知障碍方法:系统综述","authors":"Samaneh Fouladi, A. Safaei","doi":"10.52547/shefa.9.1.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Alzheimer Disease 2. Cognitive Dysfunction 3. Electroencephalography Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease is a brain disorder that gradually des troys cognitive function and eventually the ability to carry out daily routine tasks. Early diagnosis of this disease has attracted the attention of many physicians and scholars, and several methods have been used to detect it in early phases. Evaluation of artificial neural networks is low-cos t with no side effect method that is used for diagnosing and predicting Alzheimer’s disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment based on electroencephalogram signals. Materials and Methods: for this sys tematic review, keywords Alzheimer’s, Artificial Neural network and EEG were searched in IEEE, PubMed central, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases between 2000 to 2019. Then, they were selected for critical evaluation based on the mos t relevance to the subject under s tudy. Results: The search result in these databases was 100 articles. Excluding unrelated articles, only 30 articles were s tudied. In the present study, different types of artificial neural networks were described, Next, the accuracy of the classification obtained by these methods was inves tigated. The results have shown that some methods, despite being less used in research or have simple architecture, have the highes t accuracy for classification. In many s tudies, artificial neural networks have also been considered in comparison with other classification methods and the results show the superiority of these methods. Conclusion: Artificial neural networks can be used as a tool for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. This approach can be evaluated for its classification accuracy, speed, architecture, and common use. Some networks are accurate at classifying and unders tanding data, but are slow or require specific hardware/software environments. Some other networks work better with simple architectures than complex networks. Furthermore, changing the architecture of conventional networks or combining them with other methods resulted in significantly different results. Increasing accuracy of classification of these networks in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment could help to predict Alzheimer’s disease appropriately. ABSTRACT Article Info:","PeriodicalId":22899,"journal":{"name":"The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Diagnostic Methods for Cognitive Disorders Using Neural Networks Based on Electroencephalogram Signals: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Samaneh Fouladi, A. Safaei\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/shefa.9.1.152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. Alzheimer Disease 2. Cognitive Dysfunction 3. Electroencephalography Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease is a brain disorder that gradually des troys cognitive function and eventually the ability to carry out daily routine tasks. Early diagnosis of this disease has attracted the attention of many physicians and scholars, and several methods have been used to detect it in early phases. Evaluation of artificial neural networks is low-cos t with no side effect method that is used for diagnosing and predicting Alzheimer’s disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment based on electroencephalogram signals. Materials and Methods: for this sys tematic review, keywords Alzheimer’s, Artificial Neural network and EEG were searched in IEEE, PubMed central, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases between 2000 to 2019. Then, they were selected for critical evaluation based on the mos t relevance to the subject under s tudy. Results: The search result in these databases was 100 articles. Excluding unrelated articles, only 30 articles were s tudied. In the present study, different types of artificial neural networks were described, Next, the accuracy of the classification obtained by these methods was inves tigated. The results have shown that some methods, despite being less used in research or have simple architecture, have the highes t accuracy for classification. In many s tudies, artificial neural networks have also been considered in comparison with other classification methods and the results show the superiority of these methods. Conclusion: Artificial neural networks can be used as a tool for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. This approach can be evaluated for its classification accuracy, speed, architecture, and common use. Some networks are accurate at classifying and unders tanding data, but are slow or require specific hardware/software environments. Some other networks work better with simple architectures than complex networks. Furthermore, changing the architecture of conventional networks or combining them with other methods resulted in significantly different results. Increasing accuracy of classification of these networks in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment could help to predict Alzheimer’s disease appropriately. ABSTRACT Article Info:\",\"PeriodicalId\":22899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/shefa.9.1.152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/shefa.9.1.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 2.老年痴呆症认知功能障碍导读:阿尔茨海默病是一种逐渐丧失认知功能并最终丧失日常工作能力的脑部疾病。该病的早期诊断引起了许多医生和学者的重视,并采用了几种方法来早期发现该病。人工神经网络的评估是一种低成本无副作用的方法,用于基于脑电图信号诊断和预测轻度认知障碍受试者的阿尔茨海默病。材料与方法:本系统综述在2000年至2019年期间在IEEE、PubMed central、ScienceDirect和Google Scholar数据库中检索了关键词Alzheimer 's、Artificial Neural network和EEG。然后,根据与研究主题的最大相关性,选择他们进行批判性评估。结果:检索结果为100篇。排除不相关的文献,只有30篇文献被研究。在本研究中,对不同类型的人工神经网络进行了描述,然后对这些方法获得的分类精度进行了研究。结果表明,有些方法虽然在研究中使用较少或结构简单,但具有较高的分类准确率。在许多研究中,也考虑了人工神经网络与其他分类方法的比较,结果显示了这些方法的优越性。结论:人工神经网络可作为早期检测阿尔茨海默病的工具。可以对该方法的分类准确性、速度、体系结构和常用情况进行评估。有些网络在分类和理解数据方面是准确的,但速度很慢,或者需要特定的硬件/软件环境。其他一些网络在简单的架构下比复杂的网络工作得更好。此外,改变传统网络的结构或与其他方法相结合会导致显著不同的结果。在轻度认知障碍的诊断中提高这些网络分类的准确性有助于适当地预测阿尔茨海默病。摘要文章简介:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differential Diagnostic Methods for Cognitive Disorders Using Neural Networks Based on Electroencephalogram Signals: A Systematic Review
1. Alzheimer Disease 2. Cognitive Dysfunction 3. Electroencephalography Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease is a brain disorder that gradually des troys cognitive function and eventually the ability to carry out daily routine tasks. Early diagnosis of this disease has attracted the attention of many physicians and scholars, and several methods have been used to detect it in early phases. Evaluation of artificial neural networks is low-cos t with no side effect method that is used for diagnosing and predicting Alzheimer’s disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment based on electroencephalogram signals. Materials and Methods: for this sys tematic review, keywords Alzheimer’s, Artificial Neural network and EEG were searched in IEEE, PubMed central, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases between 2000 to 2019. Then, they were selected for critical evaluation based on the mos t relevance to the subject under s tudy. Results: The search result in these databases was 100 articles. Excluding unrelated articles, only 30 articles were s tudied. In the present study, different types of artificial neural networks were described, Next, the accuracy of the classification obtained by these methods was inves tigated. The results have shown that some methods, despite being less used in research or have simple architecture, have the highes t accuracy for classification. In many s tudies, artificial neural networks have also been considered in comparison with other classification methods and the results show the superiority of these methods. Conclusion: Artificial neural networks can be used as a tool for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. This approach can be evaluated for its classification accuracy, speed, architecture, and common use. Some networks are accurate at classifying and unders tanding data, but are slow or require specific hardware/software environments. Some other networks work better with simple architectures than complex networks. Furthermore, changing the architecture of conventional networks or combining them with other methods resulted in significantly different results. Increasing accuracy of classification of these networks in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment could help to predict Alzheimer’s disease appropriately. ABSTRACT Article Info:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biomarkers in Brain Traumatic Injury Separation of Healthy Individuals and Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Using the Effective Communication of Brain Signals Comparison of Cold Executive Functions in Gambling Addicts, Drug Addicts, and Normal People Alzheimer's Disease: Narrative Review of Clinical Symptoms, Molecular Alterations, and Effective Physical and Biophysical Methods in its Improvement Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES): History, Theoretical Foundations and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1