对湄公河来说,这是一场双赢的游戏

Z. Liao, Phillip M. Hannam
{"title":"对湄公河来说,这是一场双赢的游戏","authors":"Z. Liao, Phillip M. Hannam","doi":"10.1109/GIWRM.2012.6349645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been many quarrels among countries of the Mekong River Basin surrounding about use of the water resources of the river in recent years. This paper is to achieve an all-win situation in use of Mekong water resources through cooperation. A game named “The Mekong Game” was designed for those Ph.D. students and resource persons to play on the PROSPER.NET's workshop. For a hypothetical case in Mekong Game, the Shapley Value Method's results were given, which could be regarded as one of equitable results in theory, and the Mekong Game's process and outcomes are introduced in this paper. Participants were divided into six groups representing six involved “countries”. The process of meeting an agreement with an all-win idea was simulated through three round-table negotiations. The results reveal: although it is harder to get theoretical optimal aftermath considering other complicated factors than those which can be calculated, the all-win situation is still possible through bargaining and negotiation processes, which should be much better than all-lose situation such as the current one.","PeriodicalId":6394,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Symposium on Geomatics for Integrated Water Resource Management","volume":"60 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An all-win game for Mekong\",\"authors\":\"Z. Liao, Phillip M. Hannam\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GIWRM.2012.6349645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There have been many quarrels among countries of the Mekong River Basin surrounding about use of the water resources of the river in recent years. This paper is to achieve an all-win situation in use of Mekong water resources through cooperation. A game named “The Mekong Game” was designed for those Ph.D. students and resource persons to play on the PROSPER.NET's workshop. For a hypothetical case in Mekong Game, the Shapley Value Method's results were given, which could be regarded as one of equitable results in theory, and the Mekong Game's process and outcomes are introduced in this paper. Participants were divided into six groups representing six involved “countries”. The process of meeting an agreement with an all-win idea was simulated through three round-table negotiations. The results reveal: although it is harder to get theoretical optimal aftermath considering other complicated factors than those which can be calculated, the all-win situation is still possible through bargaining and negotiation processes, which should be much better than all-lose situation such as the current one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Symposium on Geomatics for Integrated Water Resource Management\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Symposium on Geomatics for Integrated Water Resource Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GIWRM.2012.6349645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Symposium on Geomatics for Integrated Water Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GIWRM.2012.6349645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,湄公河流域各国围绕湄公河水资源的利用问题发生了多次争吵。本文旨在通过合作实现湄公河水资源利用的双赢。一款名为“湄公河游戏”的游戏是为那些博士生和资源人员设计的。净的工厂。针对湄公河博弈中的一个假设案例,给出了理论上可视为公平结果之一的Shapley值法结果,并介绍了湄公河博弈的过程和结果。与会者被分成六组,代表六个有关“国家”。通过三次圆桌谈判,模拟了达成双赢协议的过程。结果表明:虽然考虑其他复杂因素的理论最优余量比可计算的余量更难,但通过讨价还价和谈判过程仍有可能实现多赢的局面,这应该比目前这种全输的局面要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An all-win game for Mekong
There have been many quarrels among countries of the Mekong River Basin surrounding about use of the water resources of the river in recent years. This paper is to achieve an all-win situation in use of Mekong water resources through cooperation. A game named “The Mekong Game” was designed for those Ph.D. students and resource persons to play on the PROSPER.NET's workshop. For a hypothetical case in Mekong Game, the Shapley Value Method's results were given, which could be regarded as one of equitable results in theory, and the Mekong Game's process and outcomes are introduced in this paper. Participants were divided into six groups representing six involved “countries”. The process of meeting an agreement with an all-win idea was simulated through three round-table negotiations. The results reveal: although it is harder to get theoretical optimal aftermath considering other complicated factors than those which can be calculated, the all-win situation is still possible through bargaining and negotiation processes, which should be much better than all-lose situation such as the current one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Water Resource Management: Cases from Africa, Asia, Australia, Latin America and USA Integrated Water Resources Management: Theoretical Concepts, Basis, Responsibilities, and Challenges of IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management in Brazil Integrated Water Resources Management in Iran Managing Water Differently: Integrated Water Resources Management as a Framework for Adaptation to Climate Change in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1