解开古兰经的编结:Wolofal和塞内冈比亚的塔夫斯基传统

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION Islamic Africa Pub Date : 2018-05-07 DOI:10.1163/21540993-00901004
J. Dell
{"title":"解开古兰经的编结:Wolofal和塞内冈比亚的塔夫斯基传统","authors":"J. Dell","doi":"10.1163/21540993-00901004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thanks to the work of scholars on both sides of the Atlantic, the orthographic practice known as “ ʿajami ,” or the writing of non-Arabic languages in Arabic script, is better known today than ever before, expanding alongside scholarly efforts to understand it. This article contributes to this renewed interest by examining the first known commentary on the Qur’an written entirely in Wolofal, or Wolof in modified Arabic script. Contra the prevailing populist spirit of contemporary ʿajami scholarship, it argues that ʿajami texts were not always intended for an audience of non-Arabophones. In the case of Mawridu al-ẓamān fī tafsīr al-qurān , a Wolofal commentary written by the Murid scholar Muhammadu Dem (d. 1965), ʿajami techniques were employed to produce a text explicitly intended for a specialized audience already literate in Arabic. Dem’s commentary therefore qualifies the argument that ʿajami texts necessarily reached non-Arabophone audiences.","PeriodicalId":41507,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Africa","volume":"80 1","pages":"55-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unbraiding the Qu’ran: Wolofal and the Tafsīr Tradition of Senegambia\",\"authors\":\"J. Dell\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/21540993-00901004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thanks to the work of scholars on both sides of the Atlantic, the orthographic practice known as “ ʿajami ,” or the writing of non-Arabic languages in Arabic script, is better known today than ever before, expanding alongside scholarly efforts to understand it. This article contributes to this renewed interest by examining the first known commentary on the Qur’an written entirely in Wolofal, or Wolof in modified Arabic script. Contra the prevailing populist spirit of contemporary ʿajami scholarship, it argues that ʿajami texts were not always intended for an audience of non-Arabophones. In the case of Mawridu al-ẓamān fī tafsīr al-qurān , a Wolofal commentary written by the Murid scholar Muhammadu Dem (d. 1965), ʿajami techniques were employed to produce a text explicitly intended for a specialized audience already literate in Arabic. Dem’s commentary therefore qualifies the argument that ʿajami texts necessarily reached non-Arabophone audiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islamic Africa\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"55-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islamic Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/21540993-00901004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21540993-00901004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于大西洋两岸学者的努力,被称为“阿贾米”的正字法实践,即用阿拉伯字母书写非阿拉伯语的做法,今天比以往任何时候都更加为人所知,随着学术努力的扩大,对它的理解也在不断扩大。这篇文章通过研究第一个完全用沃洛夫语或沃洛夫语修改的阿拉伯文字写的《古兰经》注释,有助于这种重新燃起的兴趣。与当代阿jami学者盛行的民粹主义精神相反,它认为阿jami文本并不总是为非阿拉伯语听众设计的。在Murid学者Muhammadu Dem(1965年)撰写的Wolofal评论《mawrdu al-ẓamān f ' tafs æ r al-qurān》中,采用了《al- jami》的技术,明确地为已经懂阿拉伯语的专业读者编写了一篇文本。因此,Dem的评论证明了《阿jami》文本一定会到达非阿拉伯语听众的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unbraiding the Qu’ran: Wolofal and the Tafsīr Tradition of Senegambia
Thanks to the work of scholars on both sides of the Atlantic, the orthographic practice known as “ ʿajami ,” or the writing of non-Arabic languages in Arabic script, is better known today than ever before, expanding alongside scholarly efforts to understand it. This article contributes to this renewed interest by examining the first known commentary on the Qur’an written entirely in Wolofal, or Wolof in modified Arabic script. Contra the prevailing populist spirit of contemporary ʿajami scholarship, it argues that ʿajami texts were not always intended for an audience of non-Arabophones. In the case of Mawridu al-ẓamān fī tafsīr al-qurān , a Wolofal commentary written by the Murid scholar Muhammadu Dem (d. 1965), ʿajami techniques were employed to produce a text explicitly intended for a specialized audience already literate in Arabic. Dem’s commentary therefore qualifies the argument that ʿajami texts necessarily reached non-Arabophone audiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Islamic Africa
Islamic Africa RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Islamic Africa publishes original research concerning Islam in Africa from the social sciences and the humanities, as well as primary source material and commentary essays related to Islamic Studies in Africa. The journal’s geographic scope includes the entire African continent and adjacent islands.
期刊最新文献
A Short Report on Newly Identified Manuscripts of Miṣbāḥ al-Arwāḥ: A Treatise Authorizing Takfīr in the Early Sokoto Caliphate No Longer ‘Christian’ Education: Ulama Edupreneurship in Ilorin 1995–2022 A History of a Traveling Qurʾān Manuscript in Inhambane, Mozambique Reconsidering the Intellectual Relationship between Muḥammad al-Maghīlī and ʿUthmān b. Fūdī: A Comparative Examination of Ajwiba and Sirāj al-Ikhwān End Times and the Modern World: The Ahmadiyya in Colonial Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1