接受和未接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂治疗的患者的COVID-19临床结局

Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI:10.5603/AH.a2022.0005
Ahmed Nafakhi, Ihsan Rabeea, Rasha Al-Darraji, H. Nafakhi, A. Mechi, Alhan Al-khalidi
{"title":"接受和未接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂治疗的患者的COVID-19临床结局","authors":"Ahmed Nafakhi, Ihsan Rabeea, Rasha Al-Darraji, H. Nafakhi, A. Mechi, Alhan Al-khalidi","doi":"10.5603/AH.a2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The are conflicting reports on the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) continued treatment on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Material and methods: Patients presented with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection were enrolled between 5 April 2021,and 5 June 2021. Patients who survived acute stage of the disease were asked to attend out-patient clinic after six months following COVID-19 infection diagnosis. Results: A total of 162 patients were enrolled in this study. ARB users showed significant independent association with lower fatality rate as compared to ACEI/ARB-naïve patients [OR (CI) = 0.1(0.0-0.5), p = 0.01]. The prevalence of respiratory support use and intensive care unit (ICU) admission was numerically, but not statically significant, lower among ARB users than non-ARB users. The distribution of in-hospital adverse outcome was numerically lower among ACEI users than in non ACEI users, though the association did not reach statistical significance. ARB users showed significant independent association with persistent cough [OR (CI) = 2 (1.1-10), p = 0.02]. No significant differences in other long term symptoms were found between ARB users and nonusers. On the other hand, chest pain showed higher prevalence among ACEI users than in non-ACEI users. After adjusting for baseline comorbidities, chest pain association with ACEI user was not persisted. No significant differences in other long term symptoms were found between ACEI users and nonusers. Conclusion: ARB and ACEI users showed low prevalence of in-hospital adverse outcome compared to ARB/ACEI nonusers. ARB showed significant and independent association with persistent cough.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 clinical outcomes in patients with and without ongoing therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Nafakhi, Ihsan Rabeea, Rasha Al-Darraji, H. Nafakhi, A. Mechi, Alhan Al-khalidi\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/AH.a2022.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The are conflicting reports on the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) continued treatment on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Material and methods: Patients presented with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection were enrolled between 5 April 2021,and 5 June 2021. Patients who survived acute stage of the disease were asked to attend out-patient clinic after six months following COVID-19 infection diagnosis. Results: A total of 162 patients were enrolled in this study. ARB users showed significant independent association with lower fatality rate as compared to ACEI/ARB-naïve patients [OR (CI) = 0.1(0.0-0.5), p = 0.01]. The prevalence of respiratory support use and intensive care unit (ICU) admission was numerically, but not statically significant, lower among ARB users than non-ARB users. The distribution of in-hospital adverse outcome was numerically lower among ACEI users than in non ACEI users, though the association did not reach statistical significance. ARB users showed significant independent association with persistent cough [OR (CI) = 2 (1.1-10), p = 0.02]. No significant differences in other long term symptoms were found between ARB users and nonusers. On the other hand, chest pain showed higher prevalence among ACEI users than in non-ACEI users. After adjusting for baseline comorbidities, chest pain association with ACEI user was not persisted. No significant differences in other long term symptoms were found between ACEI users and nonusers. Conclusion: ARB and ACEI users showed low prevalence of in-hospital adverse outcome compared to ARB/ACEI nonusers. ARB showed significant and independent association with persistent cough.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/AH.a2022.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/AH.a2022.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)持续治疗对COVID-19患者临床结局的影响,有相互矛盾的报道。材料和方法:在2021年4月5日至2021年6月5日期间入组出现COVID-19感染症状的患者。急性期存活的患者被要求在COVID-19感染诊断后6个月后到门诊就诊。结果:本研究共纳入162例患者。与ACEI/ARB-naïve患者相比,ARB使用者与较低的死亡率有显著的独立关联[OR (CI) = 0.1(0.0-0.5), p = 0.01]。ARB使用者中呼吸支持使用和重症监护病房(ICU)的患病率在数字上低于非ARB使用者,但在统计学上不显著。ACEI使用者的院内不良结局分布在数值上低于非ACEI使用者,尽管这种关联没有达到统计学意义。ARB使用者与持续咳嗽有显著的独立相关性[OR (CI) = 2 (1.1-10), p = 0.02]。在ARB使用者和非使用者之间没有发现其他长期症状的显著差异。另一方面,胸痛在ACEI使用者中的患病率高于非ACEI使用者。调整基线合并症后,胸痛与ACEI使用者的关联不存在。在ACEI使用者和非使用者之间没有发现其他长期症状的显著差异。结论:与不使用ARB/ACEI的患者相比,ARB和ACEI使用者的院内不良结局发生率较低。ARB与持续咳嗽有显著的独立关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
COVID-19 clinical outcomes in patients with and without ongoing therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers
Background: The are conflicting reports on the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) continued treatment on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Material and methods: Patients presented with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection were enrolled between 5 April 2021,and 5 June 2021. Patients who survived acute stage of the disease were asked to attend out-patient clinic after six months following COVID-19 infection diagnosis. Results: A total of 162 patients were enrolled in this study. ARB users showed significant independent association with lower fatality rate as compared to ACEI/ARB-naïve patients [OR (CI) = 0.1(0.0-0.5), p = 0.01]. The prevalence of respiratory support use and intensive care unit (ICU) admission was numerically, but not statically significant, lower among ARB users than non-ARB users. The distribution of in-hospital adverse outcome was numerically lower among ACEI users than in non ACEI users, though the association did not reach statistical significance. ARB users showed significant independent association with persistent cough [OR (CI) = 2 (1.1-10), p = 0.02]. No significant differences in other long term symptoms were found between ARB users and nonusers. On the other hand, chest pain showed higher prevalence among ACEI users than in non-ACEI users. After adjusting for baseline comorbidities, chest pain association with ACEI user was not persisted. No significant differences in other long term symptoms were found between ACEI users and nonusers. Conclusion: ARB and ACEI users showed low prevalence of in-hospital adverse outcome compared to ARB/ACEI nonusers. ARB showed significant and independent association with persistent cough.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1