冲突、政治距离与巴基斯坦进口额的重力模型估算

Abdul Muteen, Muhammad Anwar, Ghulam Yahya Khan
{"title":"冲突、政治距离与巴基斯坦进口额的重力模型估算","authors":"Abdul Muteen, Muhammad Anwar, Ghulam Yahya Khan","doi":"10.26710/sbsee.v4i2.2373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This article, analyze causal relation of conflicts, political distance and Pakistan's import flows. The severity of interstate military conflicts is higher between Pakistan and India. While the animosity and chauvinism between Pakistan and India increase the intensity of both armed and verbal conflicts. Comparing interstate-armed conflicts and interstate military verbal conflicts, the former has more severity than later. \nMethodology: The Gravity model is used to analyze the relationship between conflicts, political distance and Pakistan's import volume. The panel data consist on 171 countries and 1980 to 2013time period.   Findings: Conflict between Pakistan and India, the interstate-armed conflicts are less impactful than interstate military verbal conflicts on import volume. The other important finding is the changing role of political distance. Political distance significantly reduces Pakistan's import volume when we regress interstate military conflicts and political distance between Pakistan and its importing partners. Interstate military conflicts between Pakistan and India and political distance between Pakistan and its importing partners show less intensity to reduce Pakistan's imports. \nImplications: Pakistan replaced the United States of America with China as major partners that share a significant proportion of its import market due to close political preferences. At the same time, there was no significant trade between Pakistan and India because both countries indulge in military conflicts.","PeriodicalId":34116,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflicts, Political Distance and Import Volume of Pakistan, a Gravity Model Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Muteen, Muhammad Anwar, Ghulam Yahya Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.26710/sbsee.v4i2.2373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This article, analyze causal relation of conflicts, political distance and Pakistan's import flows. The severity of interstate military conflicts is higher between Pakistan and India. While the animosity and chauvinism between Pakistan and India increase the intensity of both armed and verbal conflicts. Comparing interstate-armed conflicts and interstate military verbal conflicts, the former has more severity than later. \\nMethodology: The Gravity model is used to analyze the relationship between conflicts, political distance and Pakistan's import volume. The panel data consist on 171 countries and 1980 to 2013time period.   Findings: Conflict between Pakistan and India, the interstate-armed conflicts are less impactful than interstate military verbal conflicts on import volume. The other important finding is the changing role of political distance. Political distance significantly reduces Pakistan's import volume when we regress interstate military conflicts and political distance between Pakistan and its importing partners. Interstate military conflicts between Pakistan and India and political distance between Pakistan and its importing partners show less intensity to reduce Pakistan's imports. \\nImplications: Pakistan replaced the United States of America with China as major partners that share a significant proportion of its import market due to close political preferences. At the same time, there was no significant trade between Pakistan and India because both countries indulge in military conflicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v4i2.2373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v4i2.2373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析冲突、政治距离与巴基斯坦进口流量的因果关系。巴基斯坦和印度之间的国家间军事冲突更为严重。而巴基斯坦和印度之间的敌意和沙文主义增加了武装和口头冲突的强度。比较国家间武装冲突和国家间军事言语冲突,前者的严重程度高于后者。方法:采用重力模型分析冲突、政治距离与巴基斯坦进口量之间的关系。该小组的数据包括171个国家1980年至2013年期间的数据。研究发现:巴基斯坦与印度之间的国家间武装冲突对进口量的影响小于国家间军事口头冲突。另一个重要发现是政治距离的作用在不断变化。当我们回归国家间军事冲突和巴基斯坦与其进口伙伴之间的政治距离时,政治距离显著降低了巴基斯坦的进口量。巴基斯坦和印度之间的国家间军事冲突以及巴基斯坦与其进口伙伴之间的政治距离表明,减少巴基斯坦进口的强度较小。影响:由于密切的政治偏好,巴基斯坦以中国取代美国,成为占据其进口市场很大比例的主要合作伙伴。与此同时,巴基斯坦和印度之间没有重大的贸易往来,因为两国都沉迷于军事冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conflicts, Political Distance and Import Volume of Pakistan, a Gravity Model Estimation
Purpose: This article, analyze causal relation of conflicts, political distance and Pakistan's import flows. The severity of interstate military conflicts is higher between Pakistan and India. While the animosity and chauvinism between Pakistan and India increase the intensity of both armed and verbal conflicts. Comparing interstate-armed conflicts and interstate military verbal conflicts, the former has more severity than later. Methodology: The Gravity model is used to analyze the relationship between conflicts, political distance and Pakistan's import volume. The panel data consist on 171 countries and 1980 to 2013time period.   Findings: Conflict between Pakistan and India, the interstate-armed conflicts are less impactful than interstate military verbal conflicts on import volume. The other important finding is the changing role of political distance. Political distance significantly reduces Pakistan's import volume when we regress interstate military conflicts and political distance between Pakistan and its importing partners. Interstate military conflicts between Pakistan and India and political distance between Pakistan and its importing partners show less intensity to reduce Pakistan's imports. Implications: Pakistan replaced the United States of America with China as major partners that share a significant proportion of its import market due to close political preferences. At the same time, there was no significant trade between Pakistan and India because both countries indulge in military conflicts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strategic Direction and Firm Performance: Evidence from the SACCO Sector Intervening Role of Sustainability Practices in the Nexuses of Responsible Leadership and Environmental, Task, and Contextual Performance Information Technology Factors Impacting Educators before and during COVID-19: A Study of Developing Countries Impact of Relational Benefit on Customer Loyalty with the Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction: A Study of Selective Banks of Pakistan Impression of COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Employees: Analyzing the Moderating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1