恐怖主义、穆斯林和难民话题如何在网络新闻中驱动情感基调:六国跨文化情感分析

IF 1.9 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2020-03-27 DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/A4DQP
Chung-hong Chan, Hartmut Wessler, E. M. Rinke, Kasper Welbers, W. Atteveldt, Scott L. Althaus
{"title":"恐怖主义、穆斯林和难民话题如何在网络新闻中驱动情感基调:六国跨文化情感分析","authors":"Chung-hong Chan, Hartmut Wessler, E. M. Rinke, Kasper Welbers, W. Atteveldt, Scott L. Althaus","doi":"10.17605/OSF.IO/A4DQP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study looks into how the combination of Islam, refugees, and terrorism topics leads to text-internal changes in the emotional tone of news articles and how these vary across countries and media outlets. Using a multilingual human-validated sentiment analysis, we compare fear and pity in more than 560,000 articles from the most important online news sources in six countries (U.S., Australia, Germany, Switzerland, Turkey, and Lebanon). We observe that fear and pity work antagonistically—that is, the more articles in a particular topical category contain fear, the less pity they will feature. The coverage of refugees without mentioning terrorists and Muslims/Islam featured the lowest fear and highest pity levels of all topical categories studied here. However, when refugees were covered in combination with terrorism and/or Islam, fear increased and pity decreased in Christian-majority countries, whereas no such pattern appeared in Muslim-majority countries (Lebanon, Turkey). Variations in emotions are generally driven more by country-level differences than by the political alignment of individual outlets.","PeriodicalId":51388,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication","volume":"99 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Combining Terrorism, Muslim, and Refugee Topics Drives Emotional Tone in Online News: A Six-Country Cross-Cultural Sentiment Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chung-hong Chan, Hartmut Wessler, E. M. Rinke, Kasper Welbers, W. Atteveldt, Scott L. Althaus\",\"doi\":\"10.17605/OSF.IO/A4DQP\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study looks into how the combination of Islam, refugees, and terrorism topics leads to text-internal changes in the emotional tone of news articles and how these vary across countries and media outlets. Using a multilingual human-validated sentiment analysis, we compare fear and pity in more than 560,000 articles from the most important online news sources in six countries (U.S., Australia, Germany, Switzerland, Turkey, and Lebanon). We observe that fear and pity work antagonistically—that is, the more articles in a particular topical category contain fear, the less pity they will feature. The coverage of refugees without mentioning terrorists and Muslims/Islam featured the lowest fear and highest pity levels of all topical categories studied here. However, when refugees were covered in combination with terrorism and/or Islam, fear increased and pity decreased in Christian-majority countries, whereas no such pattern appeared in Muslim-majority countries (Lebanon, Turkey). Variations in emotions are generally driven more by country-level differences than by the political alignment of individual outlets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A4DQP\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A4DQP","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这项研究探讨了伊斯兰教、难民和恐怖主义话题的结合如何导致新闻文章情感基调的文本内部变化,以及这些变化在不同国家和媒体渠道之间的差异。我们使用一种多语言的人工验证情感分析,比较了来自六个国家(美国、澳大利亚、德国、瑞士、土耳其和黎巴嫩)最重要的在线新闻来源的56万多篇文章中的恐惧和同情。我们观察到,恐惧和同情是对立的——也就是说,在一个特定主题类别中,包含恐惧的文章越多,同情的文章就越少。不提及恐怖分子和穆斯林/伊斯兰教的难民报道在这里研究的所有主题类别中表现出最低的恐惧和最高的怜悯。然而,当难民与恐怖主义和/或伊斯兰教结合在一起时,在基督教占多数的国家,恐惧增加,怜悯减少,而在穆斯林占多数的国家(黎巴嫩,土耳其)没有出现这种模式。情绪的变化通常更多地是由国家层面的差异驱动的,而不是由个别媒体的政治结盟驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Combining Terrorism, Muslim, and Refugee Topics Drives Emotional Tone in Online News: A Six-Country Cross-Cultural Sentiment Analysis
This study looks into how the combination of Islam, refugees, and terrorism topics leads to text-internal changes in the emotional tone of news articles and how these vary across countries and media outlets. Using a multilingual human-validated sentiment analysis, we compare fear and pity in more than 560,000 articles from the most important online news sources in six countries (U.S., Australia, Germany, Switzerland, Turkey, and Lebanon). We observe that fear and pity work antagonistically—that is, the more articles in a particular topical category contain fear, the less pity they will feature. The coverage of refugees without mentioning terrorists and Muslims/Islam featured the lowest fear and highest pity levels of all topical categories studied here. However, when refugees were covered in combination with terrorism and/or Islam, fear increased and pity decreased in Christian-majority countries, whereas no such pattern appeared in Muslim-majority countries (Lebanon, Turkey). Variations in emotions are generally driven more by country-level differences than by the political alignment of individual outlets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Communication is an online, multi-media, academic journal that adheres to the highest standards of peer review and engages established and emerging scholars from anywhere in the world. The International Journal of Communication is an interdisciplinary journal that, while centered in communication, is open and welcoming to contributions from the many disciplines and approaches that meet at the crossroads that is communication study. We are interested in scholarship that crosses disciplinary lines and speaks to readers from a range of theoretical and methodological perspectives. In other words, the International Journal of Communication will be a forum for scholars when they address the wider audiences of our many sub-fields and specialties, rather than the location for the narrower conversations more appropriately conducted within more specialized journals. USC Annenberg Press USC Annenberg Press is committed to excellence in communication scholarship, journalism, media research, and application. To advance this goal, we edit and publish prominent scholarly publications that are both innovative and influential, and that chart new courses in their respective fields of study. Annenberg Press is among the first to deliver journal content online free of charge, and devoted to the wide dissemination of its content. Annenberg Press continues to offer scholars and readers a forum that meets the highest standards of peer review and engages established and emerging scholars from anywhere in the world.
期刊最新文献
Media Representations of Academia: Mapping and Typologizing News Coverage of All Swiss Higher Education Institutions Making Sense of Metrics in the Music Industries Discursive Media Institutionalism: Assessing Vivien A. Schmidt’s Framework and Its Value for Media and Communication Studies (Mis)informed During COVID-19: How Education Level and Information Sources Contribute to Knowledge Gaps Research perspectives on TikTok and its legacy apps: introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1