哥伦比亚的刑事改革(1830-1940):政治意识形态、权力组织和社会价值观

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/001152582020209
Aura Helena Peñas Felizzola, G. Soares
{"title":"哥伦比亚的刑事改革(1830-1940):政治意识形态、权力组织和社会价值观","authors":"Aura Helena Peñas Felizzola, G. Soares","doi":"10.1590/001152582020209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penal Reforms in Colombia (1830-1940): Political Ideologies, Power Organization, and Social Values This article analyzes the qualitative and quantitative trends in formal punishment in Colombia in four of the penal codes approved between 1830 and 1940. The aim is to explore the explanatory power of social theories about the punishments prescribed by the laws, namely: a) Durkheim’s, which attributes the greater severity of punishments to the predominance of mechanical solidarity and the greater concentration of political power; b) the Marxist, based on the conception of criminal law as the ideology of the ruling class; and c) those of Merton and Elias, who highlight the connection between the severity of the punishments prescribed by the law and the actual violence. It is concluded that the penal system seeks to impose ideas of social order that are configured mainly through politics but also suffer moral, religious and economic influences.","PeriodicalId":51809,"journal":{"name":"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reformas Penais na Colômbia (1830-1940): Ideologias Políticas, Organização do Poder e Valores Sociais\",\"authors\":\"Aura Helena Peñas Felizzola, G. Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/001152582020209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Penal Reforms in Colombia (1830-1940): Political Ideologies, Power Organization, and Social Values This article analyzes the qualitative and quantitative trends in formal punishment in Colombia in four of the penal codes approved between 1830 and 1940. The aim is to explore the explanatory power of social theories about the punishments prescribed by the laws, namely: a) Durkheim’s, which attributes the greater severity of punishments to the predominance of mechanical solidarity and the greater concentration of political power; b) the Marxist, based on the conception of criminal law as the ideology of the ruling class; and c) those of Merton and Elias, who highlight the connection between the severity of the punishments prescribed by the law and the actual violence. It is concluded that the penal system seeks to impose ideas of social order that are configured mainly through politics but also suffer moral, religious and economic influences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/001152582020209\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/001152582020209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

哥伦比亚的刑罚改革(1830-1940):政治意识形态、权力组织与社会价值本文分析了1830-1940年间哥伦比亚通过的四部刑法典中正式刑罚的定性和定量趋势。目的是探讨法律规定的惩罚的社会理论的解释力,即:a)迪尔凯姆的,将更严厉的惩罚归因于机械团结的优势和政治权力的更大集中;b)马克思主义者,基于刑法作为统治阶级意识形态的概念;c)默顿和伊莱亚斯的观点,他们强调了法律规定的惩罚的严厉程度与实际暴力之间的联系。结论是,刑罚制度试图强加社会秩序的观念,这些观念主要是通过政治形成的,但也受到道德、宗教和经济的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reformas Penais na Colômbia (1830-1940): Ideologias Políticas, Organização do Poder e Valores Sociais
Penal Reforms in Colombia (1830-1940): Political Ideologies, Power Organization, and Social Values This article analyzes the qualitative and quantitative trends in formal punishment in Colombia in four of the penal codes approved between 1830 and 1940. The aim is to explore the explanatory power of social theories about the punishments prescribed by the laws, namely: a) Durkheim’s, which attributes the greater severity of punishments to the predominance of mechanical solidarity and the greater concentration of political power; b) the Marxist, based on the conception of criminal law as the ideology of the ruling class; and c) those of Merton and Elias, who highlight the connection between the severity of the punishments prescribed by the law and the actual violence. It is concluded that the penal system seeks to impose ideas of social order that are configured mainly through politics but also suffer moral, religious and economic influences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais
Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais is a quarterly publication of the Instituto Universitário de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro (IUPERJ) aiming at publishing original articles in the area of social sciences. IUPERJ is the social sciences research organ of the Universidade Candido Mendes - UCAM. Opinions and concepdados expressed in signed articles are exclusive responsibility of the authors. Published from 1966, the journal"s abbreviated title is Dados, the form that should be used in bibliographies, footnotes, and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Bancada Feminina e o Aborto: Os Pronunciamentos das Mulheres na Câmara dos Deputados do Brasil e do Uruguai Distinções, Mediações Excludentes e Desigualdades: a Governança da Saúde Reprodutiva de “Cadastradas Difíceis” Preferências e Politização do Judiciário no Brasil Contemporâneo: Uma Análise de Casos de Combate à Corrupção Arranjo Federativo e Desigualdades em Saúde no Brasil e na Argentina Geo-Politizando los Espacios Intermedios del Sistema-Mundo: Semicentros y Semiperiferias, Geoestrategias de Subordinación y de Autonomía en América Latina y Europa Meridional tras la Guerra Fría
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1