使用时间使用日记来跟踪COVID-19社会限制连续阶段的行为变化

O. Sullivan, J. Gershuny, Almudena Sevilla, Francesca Foliano, Marga Vega-Rapun, Juana Lamote de Grignon, Teresa A. Harms, Pierre Walthery
{"title":"使用时间使用日记来跟踪COVID-19社会限制连续阶段的行为变化","authors":"O. Sullivan, J. Gershuny, Almudena Sevilla, Francesca Foliano, Marga Vega-Rapun, Juana Lamote de Grignon, Teresa A. Harms, Pierre Walthery","doi":"10.1101/2021.01.29.21250766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significance What do people do during lockdown? This unique sequence of four time-use diary surveys provides real-time information on changing behavior in the United Kingdom during each major phase of social restrictions. We compare 24-h continuous and comprehensive information on the populations’ activities, their social context, and their location, assessing risk-related behavior during different phases of institutional response to the pandemic. Holding constant gender, age, and social grade, we show that the UK population spent on average 35 more minutes per day in high-risk activity combinations in the second UK lockdown in November 2020 than in the first lockdown (starting March 2020). This difference is shown to be associated with an increase in time spent doing paid work in the workplace. How did people change their behavior over the different phases of the UK COVID-19 restrictions, and how did these changes affect their risk of being exposed to infection? Time-use diary surveys are unique in providing a complete chronicle of daily behavior: 24-h continuous records of the populations’ activities, their social context, and their location. We present results from four such surveys, collected in real time from representative UK samples, both before and at three points over the course of the current pandemic. Comparing across the four waves, we find evidence of substantial changes in the UK population’s behavior relating to activities, locations, and social context. We assign different levels of risk to combinations of activities, locations, and copresence to compare risk-related behavior across successive “lockdowns.” We find evidence that during the second lockdown (November 2020), there was an increase in high-risk behaviors relative to the first (starting March 2020). This increase is shown to be associated with more paid work time in the workplace. At a time when capacity is still limited both in respect of immunization and track–trace technology, governments must continue to rely on changes in people’s daily behaviors to contain the spread of COVID-19 and similar viruses. Time-use diary information of this type, collected in real time across the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, can provide policy makers with information to assess and quantify changes in daily behaviors and the impact they are likely to have on overall behavioral-associated risks.","PeriodicalId":20595,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using time-use diaries to track changing behavior across successive stages of COVID-19 social restrictions\",\"authors\":\"O. Sullivan, J. Gershuny, Almudena Sevilla, Francesca Foliano, Marga Vega-Rapun, Juana Lamote de Grignon, Teresa A. Harms, Pierre Walthery\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2021.01.29.21250766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Significance What do people do during lockdown? This unique sequence of four time-use diary surveys provides real-time information on changing behavior in the United Kingdom during each major phase of social restrictions. We compare 24-h continuous and comprehensive information on the populations’ activities, their social context, and their location, assessing risk-related behavior during different phases of institutional response to the pandemic. Holding constant gender, age, and social grade, we show that the UK population spent on average 35 more minutes per day in high-risk activity combinations in the second UK lockdown in November 2020 than in the first lockdown (starting March 2020). This difference is shown to be associated with an increase in time spent doing paid work in the workplace. How did people change their behavior over the different phases of the UK COVID-19 restrictions, and how did these changes affect their risk of being exposed to infection? Time-use diary surveys are unique in providing a complete chronicle of daily behavior: 24-h continuous records of the populations’ activities, their social context, and their location. We present results from four such surveys, collected in real time from representative UK samples, both before and at three points over the course of the current pandemic. Comparing across the four waves, we find evidence of substantial changes in the UK population’s behavior relating to activities, locations, and social context. We assign different levels of risk to combinations of activities, locations, and copresence to compare risk-related behavior across successive “lockdowns.” We find evidence that during the second lockdown (November 2020), there was an increase in high-risk behaviors relative to the first (starting March 2020). This increase is shown to be associated with more paid work time in the workplace. At a time when capacity is still limited both in respect of immunization and track–trace technology, governments must continue to rely on changes in people’s daily behaviors to contain the spread of COVID-19 and similar viruses. Time-use diary information of this type, collected in real time across the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, can provide policy makers with information to assess and quantify changes in daily behaviors and the impact they are likely to have on overall behavioral-associated risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.29.21250766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.29.21250766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

禁闭期间人们会做什么?这个独特的四次时间使用日记调查序列提供了英国在社会限制的每个主要阶段改变行为的实时信息。我们比较了有关人群活动、社会背景和地点的24小时连续全面信息,评估了机构应对大流行不同阶段的风险相关行为。在性别、年龄和社会等级不变的情况下,我们发现,在2020年11月英国第二次封锁期间,英国人口平均每天在高风险活动组合中花费的时间比第一次封锁(从2020年3月开始)多35分钟。这种差异与在工作场所从事有偿工作的时间增加有关。在英国COVID-19限制的不同阶段,人们如何改变他们的行为,这些变化如何影响他们暴露于感染的风险?时间使用日记调查在提供日常行为的完整编年史方面是独一无二的:24小时连续记录人口的活动,他们的社会背景和他们的位置。我们介绍了四项此类调查的结果,这些调查是在当前大流行之前和过程中的三个点从具有代表性的英国样本中实时收集的。通过对这四次浪潮的比较,我们发现了英国人在活动、地点和社会背景方面的行为发生了实质性变化的证据。我们将不同级别的风险分配给活动、地点和存在的组合,以比较连续“封锁”期间与风险相关的行为。我们发现有证据表明,在第二次封城期间(2020年11月),与第一次封城(从2020年3月开始)相比,高危行为有所增加。这一增长被证明与工作场所更多的有偿工作时间有关。在免疫和追踪技术能力仍然有限的情况下,各国政府必须继续依靠改变人们的日常行为来遏制COVID-19和类似病毒的传播。这种在COVID-19大流行期间实时收集的时间使用日记信息可以为政策制定者提供信息,以评估和量化日常行为的变化及其可能对整体行为相关风险产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using time-use diaries to track changing behavior across successive stages of COVID-19 social restrictions
Significance What do people do during lockdown? This unique sequence of four time-use diary surveys provides real-time information on changing behavior in the United Kingdom during each major phase of social restrictions. We compare 24-h continuous and comprehensive information on the populations’ activities, their social context, and their location, assessing risk-related behavior during different phases of institutional response to the pandemic. Holding constant gender, age, and social grade, we show that the UK population spent on average 35 more minutes per day in high-risk activity combinations in the second UK lockdown in November 2020 than in the first lockdown (starting March 2020). This difference is shown to be associated with an increase in time spent doing paid work in the workplace. How did people change their behavior over the different phases of the UK COVID-19 restrictions, and how did these changes affect their risk of being exposed to infection? Time-use diary surveys are unique in providing a complete chronicle of daily behavior: 24-h continuous records of the populations’ activities, their social context, and their location. We present results from four such surveys, collected in real time from representative UK samples, both before and at three points over the course of the current pandemic. Comparing across the four waves, we find evidence of substantial changes in the UK population’s behavior relating to activities, locations, and social context. We assign different levels of risk to combinations of activities, locations, and copresence to compare risk-related behavior across successive “lockdowns.” We find evidence that during the second lockdown (November 2020), there was an increase in high-risk behaviors relative to the first (starting March 2020). This increase is shown to be associated with more paid work time in the workplace. At a time when capacity is still limited both in respect of immunization and track–trace technology, governments must continue to rely on changes in people’s daily behaviors to contain the spread of COVID-19 and similar viruses. Time-use diary information of this type, collected in real time across the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, can provide policy makers with information to assess and quantify changes in daily behaviors and the impact they are likely to have on overall behavioral-associated risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tropical paleobiology discovers biodiversity in a warmer past Correction to Supporting Information for Wiedmann et al., The material footprint of nations FireCCILT11 artifacts may confound the link between biomass burning and infant mortality Reply to Giglio and Roy: Aggregate infant mortality estimates robust to choice of burned area product Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1