预测学校集水区特定年级的入学人数:对两种方法的评估

Jayajit Chakraborty, Gerard Rushton
{"title":"预测学校集水区特定年级的入学人数:对两种方法的评估","authors":"Jayajit Chakraborty,&nbsp;Gerard Rushton","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199823)2:3<157::AID-AGS1>3.0.CO;2-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Historical enrollment data for the catchment areas of individual schools are rarely useful for projecting future enrollments because their boundaries are frequently adjusted to balance growth and decline in the enrollments of individual schools. The modifiable spatial-filter method (MSF) was developed to meet this problem (Rushton, Armstrong, and Lolonis, 1995). In this article, a modifiable catchment area method (MCA) is developed, and the performance of the two methods is compared in one school district. Both methods use individual, address-matched, student records, but are different in the way they spatially aggregate these data to estimate key model parameters. Results are clearly sensitive to these differences. We apply both methods retroactively to the address-matched student records, from 1989 through 1992, of 16 elementary schools in one school district in Iowa, and we project the 1993–1996 enrollments for 17 school catchment areas in the district. We show that the average of the results of the two methods produce projections that are more accurate than either method alone. We also show that it is the nonstationarity of model parameters that leads to different levels of performance by the two methods in certain parts of the study region. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":100107,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geographic Studies","volume":"2 3","pages":"157-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199823)2:3<157::AID-AGS1>3.0.CO;2-0","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Projecting grade-specific enrollments for school catchment areas: An evaluation of two methods\",\"authors\":\"Jayajit Chakraborty,&nbsp;Gerard Rushton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199823)2:3<157::AID-AGS1>3.0.CO;2-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Historical enrollment data for the catchment areas of individual schools are rarely useful for projecting future enrollments because their boundaries are frequently adjusted to balance growth and decline in the enrollments of individual schools. The modifiable spatial-filter method (MSF) was developed to meet this problem (Rushton, Armstrong, and Lolonis, 1995). In this article, a modifiable catchment area method (MCA) is developed, and the performance of the two methods is compared in one school district. Both methods use individual, address-matched, student records, but are different in the way they spatially aggregate these data to estimate key model parameters. Results are clearly sensitive to these differences. We apply both methods retroactively to the address-matched student records, from 1989 through 1992, of 16 elementary schools in one school district in Iowa, and we project the 1993–1996 enrollments for 17 school catchment areas in the district. We show that the average of the results of the two methods produce projections that are more accurate than either method alone. We also show that it is the nonstationarity of model parameters that leads to different levels of performance by the two methods in certain parts of the study region. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geographic Studies\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"157-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199823)2:3<157::AID-AGS1>3.0.CO;2-0\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geographic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6319%28199823%292%3A3%3C157%3A%3AAID-AGS1%3E3.0.CO%3B2-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geographic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6319%28199823%292%3A3%3C157%3A%3AAID-AGS1%3E3.0.CO%3B2-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

个别学校集水区的历史入学数据很少用于预测未来的入学人数,因为它们的边界经常被调整以平衡个别学校入学人数的增长和下降。可修改空间滤波方法(MSF)的发展就是为了解决这个问题(Rushton, Armstrong, and Lolonis, 1995)。本文提出了一种改进的集水区法(MCA),并对两种方法在一个学区的效果进行了比较。这两种方法都使用个人的、地址匹配的学生记录,但它们在空间上聚合这些数据以估计关键模型参数的方式不同。结果显然对这些差异很敏感。我们将这两种方法追溯应用于爱荷华州一个学区的16所小学1989年至1992年的地址匹配学生记录,并对该学区17所学校集水区1993-1996年的入学情况进行了预测。我们表明,两种方法结果的平均值产生的预测比单独使用任何一种方法都更准确。我们还表明,正是模型参数的非平稳性导致两种方法在研究区域的某些部分的性能水平不同。©1998 John Wiley &儿子,Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Projecting grade-specific enrollments for school catchment areas: An evaluation of two methods

Historical enrollment data for the catchment areas of individual schools are rarely useful for projecting future enrollments because their boundaries are frequently adjusted to balance growth and decline in the enrollments of individual schools. The modifiable spatial-filter method (MSF) was developed to meet this problem (Rushton, Armstrong, and Lolonis, 1995). In this article, a modifiable catchment area method (MCA) is developed, and the performance of the two methods is compared in one school district. Both methods use individual, address-matched, student records, but are different in the way they spatially aggregate these data to estimate key model parameters. Results are clearly sensitive to these differences. We apply both methods retroactively to the address-matched student records, from 1989 through 1992, of 16 elementary schools in one school district in Iowa, and we project the 1993–1996 enrollments for 17 school catchment areas in the district. We show that the average of the results of the two methods produce projections that are more accurate than either method alone. We also show that it is the nonstationarity of model parameters that leads to different levels of performance by the two methods in certain parts of the study region. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automating the environmental impact assessment process: An Implementation Perspective Applied geography antecedents: Marketing geography The equidominance line: A new geopolitical concept Exploring the potential environmental sources and associations of childhood lead poisoning Measuring the fractal dimensions of a temporal forest landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1