组织自治:回顾与未来研究议程

IF 0.7 Q4 MANAGEMENT Irish Journal of Management Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1177/01492063221123264
J. Arrégle, Brice Dattée, M. Hitt, D. Bergh
{"title":"组织自治:回顾与未来研究议程","authors":"J. Arrégle, Brice Dattée, M. Hitt, D. Bergh","doi":"10.1177/01492063221123264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizational autonomy is a fundamental organizational design choice that holds a central position in management theories and practice. To date, this construct has suffered from definitional vagueness and conceptual fragmentation in its academic study across different management subfields. Drawing from a review of 87 articles appearing in top academic management journals, we had four objectives. We sought to establish clarity and consensus on the construct of organizational autonomy, to review the fragmented fields of studies on its determinants and outcomes, to identify unresolved or neglected debates, and to provide an organizing template for guiding future research. In a first section, we discuss the development of the organizational autonomy construct and review its diverse definitions, primary determinants, and outcomes. In a second section, we provide a set of recommendations spanning methodological directions and conceptual opportunities on the overlooked dynamics of organizational autonomy. Overall, our review provides a unified framework and direction for enhancing the understanding of one of the management field’s fundamental concepts.","PeriodicalId":52018,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Management","volume":"85 1","pages":"85 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Autonomy: A Review and Agenda for Future Research\",\"authors\":\"J. Arrégle, Brice Dattée, M. Hitt, D. Bergh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01492063221123264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizational autonomy is a fundamental organizational design choice that holds a central position in management theories and practice. To date, this construct has suffered from definitional vagueness and conceptual fragmentation in its academic study across different management subfields. Drawing from a review of 87 articles appearing in top academic management journals, we had four objectives. We sought to establish clarity and consensus on the construct of organizational autonomy, to review the fragmented fields of studies on its determinants and outcomes, to identify unresolved or neglected debates, and to provide an organizing template for guiding future research. In a first section, we discuss the development of the organizational autonomy construct and review its diverse definitions, primary determinants, and outcomes. In a second section, we provide a set of recommendations spanning methodological directions and conceptual opportunities on the overlooked dynamics of organizational autonomy. Overall, our review provides a unified framework and direction for enhancing the understanding of one of the management field’s fundamental concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221123264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221123264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

组织自治是一种基本的组织设计选择,在管理理论和实践中占有中心地位。迄今为止,这一结构在不同管理子领域的学术研究中遭受了定义模糊和概念碎片化的困扰。根据对顶级学术管理期刊上发表的87篇文章的综述,我们有四个目标。我们试图就组织自治的构建建立清晰和共识,回顾其决定因素和结果的支离破碎的研究领域,确定未解决或被忽视的争论,并为指导未来的研究提供一个有组织的模板。在第一部分中,我们讨论了组织自治结构的发展,并回顾了其不同的定义、主要决定因素和结果。在第二部分中,我们提供了一组关于被忽视的组织自治动态的方法方向和概念机会的建议。总的来说,我们的综述为加强对管理领域基本概念之一的理解提供了一个统一的框架和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Organizational Autonomy: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
Organizational autonomy is a fundamental organizational design choice that holds a central position in management theories and practice. To date, this construct has suffered from definitional vagueness and conceptual fragmentation in its academic study across different management subfields. Drawing from a review of 87 articles appearing in top academic management journals, we had four objectives. We sought to establish clarity and consensus on the construct of organizational autonomy, to review the fragmented fields of studies on its determinants and outcomes, to identify unresolved or neglected debates, and to provide an organizing template for guiding future research. In a first section, we discuss the development of the organizational autonomy construct and review its diverse definitions, primary determinants, and outcomes. In a second section, we provide a set of recommendations spanning methodological directions and conceptual opportunities on the overlooked dynamics of organizational autonomy. Overall, our review provides a unified framework and direction for enhancing the understanding of one of the management field’s fundamental concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Mental health disclosure in the workplace – An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the employee experience Oh the Anxiety! The Anxiety of Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality and Mitigating Effects of Ethical Leadership Give Peace a Chance? How Regulatory Foci Influence Organizational Conflict Events in Intractable Conflict Environments Geographic Distance and State's Grip: Information Asymmetry, State Inattention, and Firm Implementation of State Policy From Home to Corner Office: How Work–Life Programs Influence Women's Managerial Representation in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1