用学习分析学来理解课堂上的科学建模

Q1 Computer Science Frontiers in ICT Pub Date : 2017-11-01 DOI:10.3389/fict.2017.00024
David Quigley, Conor McNamara, Jonathan L. Ostwald, T. Sumner
{"title":"用学习分析学来理解课堂上的科学建模","authors":"David Quigley, Conor McNamara, Jonathan L. Ostwald, T. Sumner","doi":"10.3389/fict.2017.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific models represent ideas, processes, and phenomena by describing important components, characteristics, and interactions. Models are constructed across a variety of scientific disciplines, such as the food web in biology, the water cycle in Earth science, or the structure of the solar system in astronomy. Models are central for scientists to understand phenomena, construct explanations, and communicate theories. Constructing and using models to explain scientific phenomena is also an essential practice in contemporary science classrooms. Our research explores new techniques for understanding scientific modeling and engagement with modeling practices. We work with students in secondary biology classrooms as they use a web-based software tool - EcoSurvey - to characterize organisms and their interrelationships found in their local ecosystem. We use learning analytics and machine learning techniques to answer the following questions: 1) How can we automatically measure the extent to which students’ scientific models support complete explanations of phenomena? 2) How does the design of student modeling tools influence the complexity and completeness of students’ models? 3) How do clickstreams reflect and differentiate student engagement with modeling practices? We analyzed EcoSurvey usage data collected from two different deployments with over 1000 secondary students across a large urban school district. We observe large variations in the completeness and complexity of student models, and large variations in their iterative refinement processes. These differences reveal that certain key model features are highly predictive of other aspects of the model. We also observe large differences in student modeling practices across different classrooms and teachers. We can predict a student’s teacher based on the observed modeling practices with a high degree of accuracy without significant tuning of the predictive model. These results highlight the value of this approach for extending our understanding of student engagement with scientific modeling, an important contemporary science practice, as well as the potential value of analytics for identifying critical differences in classroom implementation.","PeriodicalId":37157,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ICT","volume":"76 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Learning Analytics to Understand Scientific Modeling in the Classroom\",\"authors\":\"David Quigley, Conor McNamara, Jonathan L. Ostwald, T. Sumner\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fict.2017.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific models represent ideas, processes, and phenomena by describing important components, characteristics, and interactions. Models are constructed across a variety of scientific disciplines, such as the food web in biology, the water cycle in Earth science, or the structure of the solar system in astronomy. Models are central for scientists to understand phenomena, construct explanations, and communicate theories. Constructing and using models to explain scientific phenomena is also an essential practice in contemporary science classrooms. Our research explores new techniques for understanding scientific modeling and engagement with modeling practices. We work with students in secondary biology classrooms as they use a web-based software tool - EcoSurvey - to characterize organisms and their interrelationships found in their local ecosystem. We use learning analytics and machine learning techniques to answer the following questions: 1) How can we automatically measure the extent to which students’ scientific models support complete explanations of phenomena? 2) How does the design of student modeling tools influence the complexity and completeness of students’ models? 3) How do clickstreams reflect and differentiate student engagement with modeling practices? We analyzed EcoSurvey usage data collected from two different deployments with over 1000 secondary students across a large urban school district. We observe large variations in the completeness and complexity of student models, and large variations in their iterative refinement processes. These differences reveal that certain key model features are highly predictive of other aspects of the model. We also observe large differences in student modeling practices across different classrooms and teachers. We can predict a student’s teacher based on the observed modeling practices with a high degree of accuracy without significant tuning of the predictive model. These results highlight the value of this approach for extending our understanding of student engagement with scientific modeling, an important contemporary science practice, as well as the potential value of analytics for identifying critical differences in classroom implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in ICT\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in ICT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ICT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

科学模型通过描述重要的组成部分、特征和相互作用来表示思想、过程和现象。模型是跨多种科学学科构建的,例如生物学中的食物网,地球科学中的水循环,或天文学中的太阳系结构。模型是科学家理解现象、构建解释和交流理论的核心。构建和运用模型来解释科学现象也是当代科学课堂的基本实践。我们的研究探索了理解科学建模和参与建模实践的新技术。我们与中学生物课堂上的学生合作,让他们使用基于网络的软件工具EcoSurvey来描述当地生态系统中发现的生物及其相互关系。我们使用学习分析和机器学习技术来回答以下问题:1)我们如何自动测量学生的科学模型在多大程度上支持对现象的完整解释?2)学生建模工具的设计如何影响学生模型的复杂性和完整性?3)点击流如何反映和区分学生参与建模实践?我们分析了从两个不同的部署中收集的生态调查使用数据,这些数据来自一个大型城市学区的1000多名中学生。我们观察到学生模型的完整性和复杂性有很大的变化,在他们的迭代细化过程中也有很大的变化。这些差异表明,某些关键的模型特征可以高度预测模型的其他方面。我们还观察到不同教室和教师在学生建模实践方面的巨大差异。我们可以根据观察到的建模实践,在没有对预测模型进行重大调整的情况下,高精度地预测学生的老师。这些结果突出了这种方法的价值,它扩展了我们对学生参与科学建模的理解,这是一种重要的当代科学实践,以及分析在识别课堂实施中的关键差异方面的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Learning Analytics to Understand Scientific Modeling in the Classroom
Scientific models represent ideas, processes, and phenomena by describing important components, characteristics, and interactions. Models are constructed across a variety of scientific disciplines, such as the food web in biology, the water cycle in Earth science, or the structure of the solar system in astronomy. Models are central for scientists to understand phenomena, construct explanations, and communicate theories. Constructing and using models to explain scientific phenomena is also an essential practice in contemporary science classrooms. Our research explores new techniques for understanding scientific modeling and engagement with modeling practices. We work with students in secondary biology classrooms as they use a web-based software tool - EcoSurvey - to characterize organisms and their interrelationships found in their local ecosystem. We use learning analytics and machine learning techniques to answer the following questions: 1) How can we automatically measure the extent to which students’ scientific models support complete explanations of phenomena? 2) How does the design of student modeling tools influence the complexity and completeness of students’ models? 3) How do clickstreams reflect and differentiate student engagement with modeling practices? We analyzed EcoSurvey usage data collected from two different deployments with over 1000 secondary students across a large urban school district. We observe large variations in the completeness and complexity of student models, and large variations in their iterative refinement processes. These differences reveal that certain key model features are highly predictive of other aspects of the model. We also observe large differences in student modeling practices across different classrooms and teachers. We can predict a student’s teacher based on the observed modeling practices with a high degree of accuracy without significant tuning of the predictive model. These results highlight the value of this approach for extending our understanding of student engagement with scientific modeling, an important contemporary science practice, as well as the potential value of analytics for identifying critical differences in classroom implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in ICT
Frontiers in ICT Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Project Westdrive: Unity City With Self-Driving Cars and Pedestrians for Virtual Reality Studies The Syncopated Energy Algorithm for Rendering Real-Time Tactile Interactions Dyadic Interference Leads to Area of Uncertainty During Face-to-Face Cooperative Interception Task Eyelid and Pupil Landmark Detection and Blink Estimation Based on Deformable Shape Models for Near-Field Infrared Video Toward Industry 4.0 With IoT: Optimizing Business Processes in an Evolving Manufacturing Factory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1