Hilzo食管支架治疗恶性食管梗阻患者吞咽困难的安全性和有效性

Eamon Lagha, D. Mulholland, Catharine Tadros, M. Faris, T. Sabharwal, A. Diamantopoulos, I. Ahmed
{"title":"Hilzo食管支架治疗恶性食管梗阻患者吞咽困难的安全性和有效性","authors":"Eamon Lagha, D. Mulholland, Catharine Tadros, M. Faris, T. Sabharwal, A. Diamantopoulos, I. Ahmed","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A multi-institutional retrospective review in four oncology centers was performed during a 5-year period (2015–2020) identifying all patients who underwent placement of the Hilzo esophageal stent for the management of malignant esophageal obstruction. Patient notes, imaging, and reports of each procedure were reviewed for demographics, lesion, and tumor-specific characteristics. The primary outcome was an improvement in symptoms of dysphagia using the Mellow–Pinkas dysphagia score. Secondary outcomes were periprocedural mortality, 30-day mortality, tumor overgrowth/restenosis, stent migration, stent compression/failure-to-expand, worsening dysphagia of unidentified cause, and procedure-related complications. A total of 58 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study and were analyzed. The median follow-up was 151 days (range: 6–627). The median dysphagia score improved from 3 to 1. Improvement was noted on 90% of the cases reporting dysphagia data. The 30-day mortality rate was 16%. No major complications were noted related to the procedure (grade: 4–6). Minor complications (grade: 1–3) included chest pain/odynophagia/heartburn in 17 (29%) of patients which all settled with symptomatic management. Secondary outcomes were as follows: tumor overgrowth/restenosis, 13 (22%); stent migration, 9 (16%); stent compression/failure to expand, 3 (5%); and worsening dysphagia of unidentified cause, 4 (7%). The Hilzo stent performed in line with the performance of other esophageal stents on the market. Hilzo stent insertion improved dysphagia scores with no major complications reported.","PeriodicalId":91014,"journal":{"name":"Digestive disease interventions","volume":"15 1","pages":"163 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of the Hilzo Esophageal Stent for the Management of Dysphagia in Malignant Esophageal Obstruction\",\"authors\":\"Eamon Lagha, D. Mulholland, Catharine Tadros, M. Faris, T. Sabharwal, A. Diamantopoulos, I. Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1757544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A multi-institutional retrospective review in four oncology centers was performed during a 5-year period (2015–2020) identifying all patients who underwent placement of the Hilzo esophageal stent for the management of malignant esophageal obstruction. Patient notes, imaging, and reports of each procedure were reviewed for demographics, lesion, and tumor-specific characteristics. The primary outcome was an improvement in symptoms of dysphagia using the Mellow–Pinkas dysphagia score. Secondary outcomes were periprocedural mortality, 30-day mortality, tumor overgrowth/restenosis, stent migration, stent compression/failure-to-expand, worsening dysphagia of unidentified cause, and procedure-related complications. A total of 58 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study and were analyzed. The median follow-up was 151 days (range: 6–627). The median dysphagia score improved from 3 to 1. Improvement was noted on 90% of the cases reporting dysphagia data. The 30-day mortality rate was 16%. No major complications were noted related to the procedure (grade: 4–6). Minor complications (grade: 1–3) included chest pain/odynophagia/heartburn in 17 (29%) of patients which all settled with symptomatic management. Secondary outcomes were as follows: tumor overgrowth/restenosis, 13 (22%); stent migration, 9 (16%); stent compression/failure to expand, 3 (5%); and worsening dysphagia of unidentified cause, 4 (7%). The Hilzo stent performed in line with the performance of other esophageal stents on the market. Hilzo stent insertion improved dysphagia scores with no major complications reported.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive disease interventions\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"163 - 168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive disease interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive disease interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在4个肿瘤中心进行了5年(2015-2020年)的多机构回顾性研究,确定了所有接受Hilzo食管支架置入治疗恶性食管梗阻的患者。回顾了患者记录、影像和每个手术的报告,以了解人口统计学、病变和肿瘤特异性特征。主要结局是使用Mellow-Pinkas吞咽困难评分改善吞咽困难症状。次要结局是手术期死亡率、30天死亡率、肿瘤过度生长/再狭窄、支架迁移、支架受压/扩张失败、不明原因的吞咽困难恶化以及手术相关并发症。共有58例患者符合本研究的纳入标准并进行了分析。中位随访为151天(范围:6-627天)。吞咽困难的中位评分从3分提高到1分。90%报告吞咽困难数据的病例均有改善。30天死亡率为16%。未发现与手术相关的主要并发症(评分:4-6)。轻微并发症(等级:1-3)包括17例(29%)患者胸痛/咽痛/烧心,所有患者均通过症状管理解决。次要结局如下:肿瘤过度生长/再狭窄,13例(22%);支架迁移,9例(16%);支架受压/膨胀失败,3 (5%);原因不明的吞咽困难加重4例(7%)。Hilzo支架的表现与市场上其他食管支架的表现一致。Hilzo支架置入改善了吞咽困难评分,无重大并发症报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and Efficacy of the Hilzo Esophageal Stent for the Management of Dysphagia in Malignant Esophageal Obstruction
Abstract A multi-institutional retrospective review in four oncology centers was performed during a 5-year period (2015–2020) identifying all patients who underwent placement of the Hilzo esophageal stent for the management of malignant esophageal obstruction. Patient notes, imaging, and reports of each procedure were reviewed for demographics, lesion, and tumor-specific characteristics. The primary outcome was an improvement in symptoms of dysphagia using the Mellow–Pinkas dysphagia score. Secondary outcomes were periprocedural mortality, 30-day mortality, tumor overgrowth/restenosis, stent migration, stent compression/failure-to-expand, worsening dysphagia of unidentified cause, and procedure-related complications. A total of 58 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study and were analyzed. The median follow-up was 151 days (range: 6–627). The median dysphagia score improved from 3 to 1. Improvement was noted on 90% of the cases reporting dysphagia data. The 30-day mortality rate was 16%. No major complications were noted related to the procedure (grade: 4–6). Minor complications (grade: 1–3) included chest pain/odynophagia/heartburn in 17 (29%) of patients which all settled with symptomatic management. Secondary outcomes were as follows: tumor overgrowth/restenosis, 13 (22%); stent migration, 9 (16%); stent compression/failure to expand, 3 (5%); and worsening dysphagia of unidentified cause, 4 (7%). The Hilzo stent performed in line with the performance of other esophageal stents on the market. Hilzo stent insertion improved dysphagia scores with no major complications reported.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Using Modern Radiation Therapy Techniques Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration: A Modified Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastric Varices Developing an Interventional Radiology Service Role of Interventional Radiology in the Management of Liver Transplant Complications in Children Pediatric Liver Interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1