市场准入、空间不平等与通用技术

Kohei Nagamachi
{"title":"市场准入、空间不平等与通用技术","authors":"Kohei Nagamachi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3317926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the interplay between the spatial distribution of economic activity and technological progress in the context of general purpose technologies with emphasis on market access. A tractable spatial equilibrium model is developed, in which ex-ante identical cities sort themselves into different technology generations through the interaction between migration, firms’ technology choice, and technological progress. Spatial inequality encourages technological progress, while the reverse causality has inverted-U-shaped effects. The interplay exhibits cross-city divergence and possibly convergence with/without persistent expansion of top cities, where convergence can limit technological progress and diffusion, and thus convergence itself, due to adjustment costs of technology adoption.","PeriodicalId":11062,"journal":{"name":"Development of Innovation eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market Access, Spatial Inequality, and General Purpose Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Kohei Nagamachi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3317926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the interplay between the spatial distribution of economic activity and technological progress in the context of general purpose technologies with emphasis on market access. A tractable spatial equilibrium model is developed, in which ex-ante identical cities sort themselves into different technology generations through the interaction between migration, firms’ technology choice, and technological progress. Spatial inequality encourages technological progress, while the reverse causality has inverted-U-shaped effects. The interplay exhibits cross-city divergence and possibly convergence with/without persistent expansion of top cities, where convergence can limit technological progress and diffusion, and thus convergence itself, due to adjustment costs of technology adoption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development of Innovation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development of Innovation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3317926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3317926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了在通用技术背景下经济活动的空间分布与技术进步之间的相互作用,重点是市场准入。建立了一个可处理的空间均衡模型,在该模型中,事前相同的城市通过迁移、企业技术选择和技术进步之间的相互作用将自己划分为不同的技术代际。空间不平等促进了技术进步,而反向因果关系具有倒u型效应。在顶级城市持续扩张的情况下,这种相互作用表现出跨城市的差异,并可能趋同。由于技术采用的调整成本,趋同可能限制技术进步和扩散,从而限制趋同本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Market Access, Spatial Inequality, and General Purpose Technologies
We study the interplay between the spatial distribution of economic activity and technological progress in the context of general purpose technologies with emphasis on market access. A tractable spatial equilibrium model is developed, in which ex-ante identical cities sort themselves into different technology generations through the interaction between migration, firms’ technology choice, and technological progress. Spatial inequality encourages technological progress, while the reverse causality has inverted-U-shaped effects. The interplay exhibits cross-city divergence and possibly convergence with/without persistent expansion of top cities, where convergence can limit technological progress and diffusion, and thus convergence itself, due to adjustment costs of technology adoption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Development Contests Financial Innovation in the 21st Century: Evidence from U.S. Patents Local Technology Adoption and Innovation: The Establishment of U.S. Airmail and the Organization of Aviation Innovation Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives Conceptualizing Strategic Innovation in a Firm Context: A Theoretical Review and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1