问责制还是大破坏?措施二下行政法规制定的立法审查

2区 法学 Q1 Social Sciences Administrative Law Review Pub Date : 2008-03-27 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3392120
Susan L. Smith
{"title":"问责制还是大破坏?措施二下行政法规制定的立法审查","authors":"Susan L. Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3392120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines legislative review of administrative rule-making in Oregon. It analyzes a 2000 proposed amendment to the Oregon Constitution, defeated by the voters after publication of this analysis, that called for enhanced legislative review of administrative rules. It also analyzes the probable impact on the Oregon land use system had the proposed amendment passed. The paper argues that Oregon's current system provides adequate legislative oversight of administrative rule-making.","PeriodicalId":51730,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law Review","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating Accountability or Wreaking Havoc? Legislative Review of Administrative Rulemaking Under Measure 2\",\"authors\":\"Susan L. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3392120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines legislative review of administrative rule-making in Oregon. It analyzes a 2000 proposed amendment to the Oregon Constitution, defeated by the voters after publication of this analysis, that called for enhanced legislative review of administrative rules. It also analyzes the probable impact on the Oregon land use system had the proposed amendment passed. The paper argues that Oregon's current system provides adequate legislative oversight of administrative rule-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Law Review\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3392120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"法学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3392120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了俄勒冈州行政法规制定的立法审查。它分析了2000年提出的俄勒冈州宪法修正案,该修正案呼吁加强对行政规则的立法审查,在该分析发表后被选民否决。它还分析了拟议修正案通过后对俄勒冈州土地使用系统可能产生的影响。论文认为,俄勒冈州目前的制度为行政法规的制定提供了充分的立法监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating Accountability or Wreaking Havoc? Legislative Review of Administrative Rulemaking Under Measure 2
This paper examines legislative review of administrative rule-making in Oregon. It analyzes a 2000 proposed amendment to the Oregon Constitution, defeated by the voters after publication of this analysis, that called for enhanced legislative review of administrative rules. It also analyzes the probable impact on the Oregon land use system had the proposed amendment passed. The paper argues that Oregon's current system provides adequate legislative oversight of administrative rule-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Approach of the Administrative Court of Justice regarding to Extension of the Effect of Annulment of Regulations to the Time of Approval Analysis of the Effect of Whistleblowing on the Fiscal Discipline of Govermental companies Investigating the Requirements of the Decentralization System in the Social Security Organization Legislative policy of Iran Customs Law and its damages Investigating the violation of individuals' rights; An independent and neglected direction in the judicial supervision of the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1