COVID-19对人员跨境流动和边境功能区的影响:基于Twitter数据的北欧案例研究

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.1080/04353684.2022.2101135
Håvard Wallin Aagesen, O. Järv, P. Gerber
{"title":"COVID-19对人员跨境流动和边境功能区的影响:基于Twitter数据的北欧案例研究","authors":"Håvard Wallin Aagesen, O. Järv, P. Gerber","doi":"10.1080/04353684.2022.2101135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mobility is a global megatrend in our contemporary world as people are constantly crossing nation-state borders for migration, tourism, work and due to mobile transnational lives. Cross-border practices contribute to (re)produce functional border regions between different countries. The current amount of information on the geographies of cross-border mobilities of people, the creation of functional cross-border regions and how these regions change over time is inadequate. As transnational phenomena are fragile to global disruptions and prone to ‘rebordering’ in times of emergency, we lack knowledge of how the COVID-19 crisis affected border practices and functioning regions. We consider mobility to be a tool for understanding society and used big data to examine cross-border mobilities between the five Nordic countries: when and where borders were crossed, how mobilities captured functional border regions, and evaluated the influence of COVID-19 on mobilities and functional border regions from a spatio-temporal perspective. The feasibility of the proposed methodology for monitoring cross-border mobilities and border regions to improve planning and development of border regions and decision-making in future crises is discussed. We studied a 4-year Twitter dataset, including the first year of the pandemic until February 2021. We found that overall cross-border mobility decreased by 68% due to the pandemic, yet with geographical and temporal variations. We showed how the influence of the pandemic on the spatial extent of functional border regions varies for a range of reasons for cross-border mobility. We discuss the feasibility of the proposed approach for monitoring cross-border interactions as the proof-of-concept for capturing functional border regions to improve planning and development of border regions and decision-making in future crises. Finally, we highlight future avenues in enhancing our proposed methodology to improve information on cross-border mobilities derived from social media data such as Twitter.","PeriodicalId":47542,"journal":{"name":"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography","volume":"53 1","pages":"356 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of COVID-19 on cross-border mobilities of people and functional border regions: the Nordic case study from Twitter data\",\"authors\":\"Håvard Wallin Aagesen, O. Järv, P. Gerber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/04353684.2022.2101135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Mobility is a global megatrend in our contemporary world as people are constantly crossing nation-state borders for migration, tourism, work and due to mobile transnational lives. Cross-border practices contribute to (re)produce functional border regions between different countries. The current amount of information on the geographies of cross-border mobilities of people, the creation of functional cross-border regions and how these regions change over time is inadequate. As transnational phenomena are fragile to global disruptions and prone to ‘rebordering’ in times of emergency, we lack knowledge of how the COVID-19 crisis affected border practices and functioning regions. We consider mobility to be a tool for understanding society and used big data to examine cross-border mobilities between the five Nordic countries: when and where borders were crossed, how mobilities captured functional border regions, and evaluated the influence of COVID-19 on mobilities and functional border regions from a spatio-temporal perspective. The feasibility of the proposed methodology for monitoring cross-border mobilities and border regions to improve planning and development of border regions and decision-making in future crises is discussed. We studied a 4-year Twitter dataset, including the first year of the pandemic until February 2021. We found that overall cross-border mobility decreased by 68% due to the pandemic, yet with geographical and temporal variations. We showed how the influence of the pandemic on the spatial extent of functional border regions varies for a range of reasons for cross-border mobility. We discuss the feasibility of the proposed approach for monitoring cross-border interactions as the proof-of-concept for capturing functional border regions to improve planning and development of border regions and decision-making in future crises. Finally, we highlight future avenues in enhancing our proposed methodology to improve information on cross-border mobilities derived from social media data such as Twitter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"356 - 378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2022.2101135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2022.2101135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

流动是当今世界的一个全球性大趋势,因为人们不断地跨越民族国家边界进行移民,旅游,工作和由于流动的跨国生活。跨境实践有助于(重新)产生不同国家之间的功能性边界地区。目前关于人口跨界流动的地理位置、跨界功能性区域的创建以及这些区域如何随时间变化的信息量是不足的。由于跨国现象很容易受到全球破坏的影响,并且在紧急情况下容易“重新边界”,我们缺乏对COVID-19危机如何影响边境做法和功能区域的了解。我们认为流动性是了解社会的工具,并利用大数据研究了北欧五国之间的跨境流动性:何时何地跨越边界,流动性如何捕获功能边境地区,并从时空角度评估了COVID-19对流动性和功能边境地区的影响。讨论了拟议的监测跨境流动和边境地区的方法的可行性,以改善边境地区的规划和发展以及未来危机中的决策。我们研究了一个为期4年的推特数据集,包括大流行的第一年到2021年2月。我们发现,由于大流行,总体跨境流动性下降了68%,但存在地理和时间差异。我们展示了由于跨境流动的一系列原因,大流行对功能性边境地区空间范围的影响是如何变化的。我们讨论了所提出的监测跨境相互作用的方法的可行性,作为捕获功能性边境地区的概念验证,以改善边境地区的规划和发展以及未来危机中的决策。最后,我们强调了加强我们提出的方法的未来途径,以改进来自社交媒体数据(如Twitter)的跨境流动信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of COVID-19 on cross-border mobilities of people and functional border regions: the Nordic case study from Twitter data
ABSTRACT Mobility is a global megatrend in our contemporary world as people are constantly crossing nation-state borders for migration, tourism, work and due to mobile transnational lives. Cross-border practices contribute to (re)produce functional border regions between different countries. The current amount of information on the geographies of cross-border mobilities of people, the creation of functional cross-border regions and how these regions change over time is inadequate. As transnational phenomena are fragile to global disruptions and prone to ‘rebordering’ in times of emergency, we lack knowledge of how the COVID-19 crisis affected border practices and functioning regions. We consider mobility to be a tool for understanding society and used big data to examine cross-border mobilities between the five Nordic countries: when and where borders were crossed, how mobilities captured functional border regions, and evaluated the influence of COVID-19 on mobilities and functional border regions from a spatio-temporal perspective. The feasibility of the proposed methodology for monitoring cross-border mobilities and border regions to improve planning and development of border regions and decision-making in future crises is discussed. We studied a 4-year Twitter dataset, including the first year of the pandemic until February 2021. We found that overall cross-border mobility decreased by 68% due to the pandemic, yet with geographical and temporal variations. We showed how the influence of the pandemic on the spatial extent of functional border regions varies for a range of reasons for cross-border mobility. We discuss the feasibility of the proposed approach for monitoring cross-border interactions as the proof-of-concept for capturing functional border regions to improve planning and development of border regions and decision-making in future crises. Finally, we highlight future avenues in enhancing our proposed methodology to improve information on cross-border mobilities derived from social media data such as Twitter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Geografiska Annaler, Series B, is a prestigious international journal publishing articles covering all theoretical and empirical aspects of human and economic geography. The journal has no specific regional profile but some attention is paid to research from the Nordic countries, as well as from countries around the Baltic Sea. Geografiska Annaler, Series B is supported by the Swedish Council for Research in Humanities and Social Sciences.
期刊最新文献
The four dimensions of metropolitanization: a case study of Warsaw, Wrocław and Lublin Legitimizing a world-class hospital: policy mobility and narratives in megaproject planning Weight, relief and overcoming: a safe space for racialized women learning to swim in Sweden Public transport provision and social sustainability in Sweden Austerity through rescaling and layering in the Swedish welfare state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1