痰液筛查试验在早期排除肺炎具有高阴性预测值

A. Ramezani, Lars Eng, M. Turkina, A. Theodorsson, F. Nayeri
{"title":"痰液筛查试验在早期排除肺炎具有高阴性预测值","authors":"A. Ramezani, Lars Eng, M. Turkina, A. Theodorsson, F. Nayeri","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Pneumonia is a serious and widespread cause of morbidity and mortality. At an early stage, the symptoms are similar to other respiratory disorders, and there is no single criterion standard for diagnosis. Antibiotics are used too often as a precaution. Objectives The objective of this study was to perform an assessment and clinical evaluation of a rapid sputum screening test (index test) to rule out pneumonia. Methods Leftover sputum samples (467) collected at the Department of Microbiology from November 2016 to March 2017 were blindly analyzed within 72 hours with the index test. The clinical accuracy of the test was estimated for pneumonia by comparison with the established diagnosis by independent physicians (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision). Hepatocyte growth factor and calprotectin were measured on random samples (80), and layman volunteers (40) were asked to perform the test on artificial samples. Results Two of 73 cases of pneumonia (community-acquired and nosocomial) showed negative results by the sputum strip test (97% sensitivity and 94% negative predictive value). The test results were highly correlated to hepatocyte growth factor and calprotectin concentrations in samples (R2 = 67% respective 39%). Importantly, all of the volunteers were able to estimate the correct positive and negative results. Conclusions The novel rapid sputum test represents a feasible tool for screening and ruling out the overwhelming majority of nonsevere respiratory infections at primary care settings, at home or when properly equipped laboratories are not available.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Sputum Screening Test to Rule Out Pneumonia at an Early Stage With High Negative Predictive Value\",\"authors\":\"A. Ramezani, Lars Eng, M. Turkina, A. Theodorsson, F. Nayeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/POC.0000000000000170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Pneumonia is a serious and widespread cause of morbidity and mortality. At an early stage, the symptoms are similar to other respiratory disorders, and there is no single criterion standard for diagnosis. Antibiotics are used too often as a precaution. Objectives The objective of this study was to perform an assessment and clinical evaluation of a rapid sputum screening test (index test) to rule out pneumonia. Methods Leftover sputum samples (467) collected at the Department of Microbiology from November 2016 to March 2017 were blindly analyzed within 72 hours with the index test. The clinical accuracy of the test was estimated for pneumonia by comparison with the established diagnosis by independent physicians (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision). Hepatocyte growth factor and calprotectin were measured on random samples (80), and layman volunteers (40) were asked to perform the test on artificial samples. Results Two of 73 cases of pneumonia (community-acquired and nosocomial) showed negative results by the sputum strip test (97% sensitivity and 94% negative predictive value). The test results were highly correlated to hepatocyte growth factor and calprotectin concentrations in samples (R2 = 67% respective 39%). Importantly, all of the volunteers were able to estimate the correct positive and negative results. Conclusions The novel rapid sputum test represents a feasible tool for screening and ruling out the overwhelming majority of nonsevere respiratory infections at primary care settings, at home or when properly equipped laboratories are not available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

肺炎是一种严重而广泛的发病和死亡原因。在早期阶段,症状与其他呼吸系统疾病相似,没有单一的诊断标准。抗生素经常被用作预防措施。目的本研究的目的是对快速痰液筛查试验(指数试验)进行评估和临床评价,以排除肺炎。方法对2016年11月~ 2017年3月在医院微生物科采集的剩余痰液样本467份,在72 h内采用指数法进行盲法分析。通过与独立医生的既定诊断(国际疾病分类,第十次修订)进行比较,估计该测试对肺炎的临床准确性。肝细胞生长因子和钙保护蛋白在随机样本(80)上被测量,外行志愿者(40)被要求在人工样本上进行测试。结果73例肺炎(社区获得性和医院获得性)中2例痰条试验阴性(敏感性97%,阴性预测值94%)。检测结果与样品中肝细胞生长因子和钙保护蛋白浓度高度相关(R2 = 67%,分别为39%)。重要的是,所有的志愿者都能正确估计出阳性和阴性的结果。结论:新型快速痰液检测是一种可行的筛查工具,可在初级保健机构、家中或设备齐全的实验室不可用的情况下排除绝大多数非严重呼吸道感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Sputum Screening Test to Rule Out Pneumonia at an Early Stage With High Negative Predictive Value
Background Pneumonia is a serious and widespread cause of morbidity and mortality. At an early stage, the symptoms are similar to other respiratory disorders, and there is no single criterion standard for diagnosis. Antibiotics are used too often as a precaution. Objectives The objective of this study was to perform an assessment and clinical evaluation of a rapid sputum screening test (index test) to rule out pneumonia. Methods Leftover sputum samples (467) collected at the Department of Microbiology from November 2016 to March 2017 were blindly analyzed within 72 hours with the index test. The clinical accuracy of the test was estimated for pneumonia by comparison with the established diagnosis by independent physicians (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision). Hepatocyte growth factor and calprotectin were measured on random samples (80), and layman volunteers (40) were asked to perform the test on artificial samples. Results Two of 73 cases of pneumonia (community-acquired and nosocomial) showed negative results by the sputum strip test (97% sensitivity and 94% negative predictive value). The test results were highly correlated to hepatocyte growth factor and calprotectin concentrations in samples (R2 = 67% respective 39%). Importantly, all of the volunteers were able to estimate the correct positive and negative results. Conclusions The novel rapid sputum test represents a feasible tool for screening and ruling out the overwhelming majority of nonsevere respiratory infections at primary care settings, at home or when properly equipped laboratories are not available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of International Normalized Ratio Results by Point-of-Care Device and Clinical Laboratory Analyzers in a Vascular Surgery Department Point-of-Care Testing in Hypercoagulable Conditions Managed With Warfarin Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing Rapid Assessment of Coagulation at the Point of Care With the Hemochron Signature Elite System Invited Product Profile: Detecting Antibodies for Lyme Disease at the Point of Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1