两种实验性牙本质黏合剂与牙根质的黏结强度

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Osseointegration Pub Date : 2019-09-17 DOI:10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.17
G. Bonarini, E. F. Cagidiaco, N. Discepoli
{"title":"两种实验性牙本质黏合剂与牙根质的黏结强度","authors":"G. Bonarini, E. F. Cagidiaco, N. Discepoli","doi":"10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim The aim of this study was to test two different of experimental cements based on two types of polymerization techniques comparing them with one already well known in the market. \nMaterials and methods  Thirty intact central incisors, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected and endodontically treated, then were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 samples: Group 1, light cured composite experimental material with self-etch adhesive and dual polymerization activator; Group 2, dual experimental core build-up with self-etch adhesive and dual-polymer activator; Group 3 (control group), dual cement with self-etch adhesive and dual polymerization activator. One fiber post was luted into the root canal strictly following manufacturer’s instructions. Each sample was cut in slices in order to perform the push-out bond strength test with a testing machine. To express the bond strength in MegaPascals (MPa), the breaking load recorded in Newton (N) was divided by the area of the bonded interface (A) in mm2. The area of the bond interface was calculated as the area of the surface of a truncated cone using the formula: A = π (R + r) [h2 + (Rr) 2] 1/2, where R represents the major radius of the coronal post, r represents the minor radius of the apical post and h is the thickness of the slice in millimeters. The diameters and thickness of the slice were measured individually using a digital caliper with 0.01 mm precision. After the test, each slide was observed to detect the type of failure and classified as adhesive between cement and dentin (AD); adhesive between the cement and the post (AP); fracture of the sample, cohesive inside the post and dentin (FR); cohesive in cement (CC); mixed (M). \nResults  Group 2 recorded the highest values of adhesion strength,  group 1 the lowest. There were no statistically significant differences among groups 1 and 2 and controls. The most common failure mode was the mixed one and the less frequent was the adhesive type between the post and the cement. \nConclusions  Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the bond strength of experimental resin cements is comparable to that of a cement marketed by the same manufacturer, used here as a control and well known in the market.","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":"38 1","pages":"561-565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond strength to radicular dentin of two experimental luting cements\",\"authors\":\"G. Bonarini, E. F. Cagidiaco, N. Discepoli\",\"doi\":\"10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim The aim of this study was to test two different of experimental cements based on two types of polymerization techniques comparing them with one already well known in the market. \\nMaterials and methods  Thirty intact central incisors, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected and endodontically treated, then were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 samples: Group 1, light cured composite experimental material with self-etch adhesive and dual polymerization activator; Group 2, dual experimental core build-up with self-etch adhesive and dual-polymer activator; Group 3 (control group), dual cement with self-etch adhesive and dual polymerization activator. One fiber post was luted into the root canal strictly following manufacturer’s instructions. Each sample was cut in slices in order to perform the push-out bond strength test with a testing machine. To express the bond strength in MegaPascals (MPa), the breaking load recorded in Newton (N) was divided by the area of the bonded interface (A) in mm2. The area of the bond interface was calculated as the area of the surface of a truncated cone using the formula: A = π (R + r) [h2 + (Rr) 2] 1/2, where R represents the major radius of the coronal post, r represents the minor radius of the apical post and h is the thickness of the slice in millimeters. The diameters and thickness of the slice were measured individually using a digital caliper with 0.01 mm precision. After the test, each slide was observed to detect the type of failure and classified as adhesive between cement and dentin (AD); adhesive between the cement and the post (AP); fracture of the sample, cohesive inside the post and dentin (FR); cohesive in cement (CC); mixed (M). \\nResults  Group 2 recorded the highest values of adhesion strength,  group 1 the lowest. There were no statistically significant differences among groups 1 and 2 and controls. The most common failure mode was the mixed one and the less frequent was the adhesive type between the post and the cement. \\nConclusions  Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the bond strength of experimental resin cements is comparable to that of a cement marketed by the same manufacturer, used here as a control and well known in the market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osseointegration\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"561-565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osseointegration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是测试基于两种聚合技术的两种不同的实验水泥,并将其与市场上已知的一种水泥进行比较。材料与方法选择因牙周原因拔出的完整中切牙30个,进行根管治疗,随机分为3组,每组10个样品:第一组,采用自蚀刻胶粘剂和双聚合活化剂光固化复合实验材料;第二组:自蚀刻胶粘剂和双聚合物活化剂的双实验堆芯;第三组(对照组):双自蚀刻胶粘剂双聚合活化剂双水泥。严格按照制造商的说明将一根纤维桩插入根管。每个样品被切成薄片,以便在试验机上进行推出粘结强度测试。为了表示以兆帕斯卡(MPa)为单位的粘结强度,用牛顿(N)记录的断裂载荷除以以mm2为单位的粘结界面面积(A)。键合界面的面积用截锥表面的面积计算,公式为:a = π (R + R) [h2 + (Rr) 2] 1/2,其中R为冠状柱的大半径,R为根尖柱的小半径,h为切片的厚度,单位为毫米。切片的直径和厚度分别用精度为0.01 mm的数字卡尺测量。试验结束后,观察每一张载玻片的破坏类型,并将其归类为水泥与牙本质之间的粘接剂(AD);水泥与桩之间的胶粘剂(AP);试样断裂,桩内与牙本质粘连(FR);水泥内聚力(CC);结果2组黏附强度最高,1组黏附强度最低。1、2组与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义。最常见的破坏方式是混合破坏,较少发生的是桩与水泥之间的粘结破坏。在本研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,实验树脂水泥的粘结强度与同一制造商销售的水泥相当,这里用作对照,在市场上众所周知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bond strength to radicular dentin of two experimental luting cements
Aim The aim of this study was to test two different of experimental cements based on two types of polymerization techniques comparing them with one already well known in the market. Materials and methods  Thirty intact central incisors, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected and endodontically treated, then were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 samples: Group 1, light cured composite experimental material with self-etch adhesive and dual polymerization activator; Group 2, dual experimental core build-up with self-etch adhesive and dual-polymer activator; Group 3 (control group), dual cement with self-etch adhesive and dual polymerization activator. One fiber post was luted into the root canal strictly following manufacturer’s instructions. Each sample was cut in slices in order to perform the push-out bond strength test with a testing machine. To express the bond strength in MegaPascals (MPa), the breaking load recorded in Newton (N) was divided by the area of the bonded interface (A) in mm2. The area of the bond interface was calculated as the area of the surface of a truncated cone using the formula: A = π (R + r) [h2 + (Rr) 2] 1/2, where R represents the major radius of the coronal post, r represents the minor radius of the apical post and h is the thickness of the slice in millimeters. The diameters and thickness of the slice were measured individually using a digital caliper with 0.01 mm precision. After the test, each slide was observed to detect the type of failure and classified as adhesive between cement and dentin (AD); adhesive between the cement and the post (AP); fracture of the sample, cohesive inside the post and dentin (FR); cohesive in cement (CC); mixed (M). Results  Group 2 recorded the highest values of adhesion strength,  group 1 the lowest. There were no statistically significant differences among groups 1 and 2 and controls. The most common failure mode was the mixed one and the less frequent was the adhesive type between the post and the cement. Conclusions  Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the bond strength of experimental resin cements is comparable to that of a cement marketed by the same manufacturer, used here as a control and well known in the market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osseointegration
Journal of Osseointegration DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sealing ability of a bioceramic sealer used in combination with cold and warm obturation techniques Screw-retained restoration of a facially shifted postextraction implant in the esthetic zone with immediate provisionalization Evaluation of marginal bone loss around SLActive implants by CBCT using different implant dimensions and surgical approaches: A clinical and radiological prospective study A minimally invasive approach to osseo-disintegrate implants via thermal energy. An in-vivo pilot study Biomechanical behavior of the dental implant macrodesign in mandibular implant-supported overdentures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1