三级护理单位剖宫产术后部位感染的研究

A. Sakhalkar, K. Chaudhari, S. Dey
{"title":"三级护理单位剖宫产术后部位感染的研究","authors":"A. Sakhalkar, K. Chaudhari, S. Dey","doi":"10.7439/IJBR.V9I6.4731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical site infection in cesarean deliveries is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, increasing both in duration of patient hospitalization and hospital costs. There has been an alarming increase in the incidence of SSI in both developing and developed countries accounting for 20-25% of the nosocomial infections worldwide. Multiple risk factors causing post-cesarean SSI have been documented. Despite most modern facilities and standard protocols of preoperative preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical site infections remain a major cause of hospital-acquired infections. \nMaterial and methods: This is a prospective observational study performed from January 2015 to June 2017 with 1304 patients as the study population. All these patients were thoroughly examined and investigated. Wound was checked on day 5 of LSCS and in patients with SSI, wound swab was sent for culture sensitivity. Risk factors contributing to the SSI were noted. The wound was graded according to Southampton's grading system and further treatment was done in accordance to the grade of wound and the culture sensitivity report. \nResults:  1304 were LSCS patients who were eligible for analysis, of which 43 patients developed surgical site infection which was 3.29% wound infection rate, of which 69% were emergency and 31% were elective. These patients were evaluated for risk factors and prolonged leaking per vaginum was the most common one. The wounds were graded according to Southampton's wound grading system and most wounds were found to be 3a subtype while E. coli was the organism most commonly detected amongst the 18 patients with a culture positive report.","PeriodicalId":13909,"journal":{"name":"International journal of biomedical research","volume":"9 1","pages":"240-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of post-cesarean surgical site infections in a tertiary care unit\",\"authors\":\"A. Sakhalkar, K. Chaudhari, S. Dey\",\"doi\":\"10.7439/IJBR.V9I6.4731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Surgical site infection in cesarean deliveries is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, increasing both in duration of patient hospitalization and hospital costs. There has been an alarming increase in the incidence of SSI in both developing and developed countries accounting for 20-25% of the nosocomial infections worldwide. Multiple risk factors causing post-cesarean SSI have been documented. Despite most modern facilities and standard protocols of preoperative preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical site infections remain a major cause of hospital-acquired infections. \\nMaterial and methods: This is a prospective observational study performed from January 2015 to June 2017 with 1304 patients as the study population. All these patients were thoroughly examined and investigated. Wound was checked on day 5 of LSCS and in patients with SSI, wound swab was sent for culture sensitivity. Risk factors contributing to the SSI were noted. The wound was graded according to Southampton's grading system and further treatment was done in accordance to the grade of wound and the culture sensitivity report. \\nResults:  1304 were LSCS patients who were eligible for analysis, of which 43 patients developed surgical site infection which was 3.29% wound infection rate, of which 69% were emergency and 31% were elective. These patients were evaluated for risk factors and prolonged leaking per vaginum was the most common one. The wounds were graded according to Southampton's wound grading system and most wounds were found to be 3a subtype while E. coli was the organism most commonly detected amongst the 18 patients with a culture positive report.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of biomedical research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"240-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of biomedical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBR.V9I6.4731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBR.V9I6.4731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

剖宫产手术部位感染是发病率和死亡率的主要原因,增加了患者住院时间和医院费用。在发展中国家和发达国家,SSI的发病率都有惊人的增长,占全世界医院感染的20-25%。导致剖宫产后SSI的多种危险因素已被证实。尽管大多数现代化设施和术前准备和抗生素预防的标准方案,手术部位感染仍然是医院获得性感染的主要原因。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,于2015年1月至2017年6月进行,研究人群为1304例患者。所有患者都经过了彻底的检查和调查。在LSCS的第5天检查伤口,SSI患者送伤口拭子进行培养敏感性检查。指出了导致SSI的风险因素。根据南安普顿分级系统对伤口进行分级,根据伤口分级及培养敏感性报告进行进一步处理。结果:符合分析条件的LSCS患者1304例,其中43例发生手术部位感染,伤口感染率为3.29%,其中急诊占69%,择期占31%。对这些患者的危险因素进行了评估,最长时间的阴道泄漏是最常见的。根据南安普顿的伤口分级系统对伤口进行分级,大多数伤口被发现为3a亚型,而大肠杆菌是18例培养阳性报告中最常见的生物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A study of post-cesarean surgical site infections in a tertiary care unit
Introduction: Surgical site infection in cesarean deliveries is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, increasing both in duration of patient hospitalization and hospital costs. There has been an alarming increase in the incidence of SSI in both developing and developed countries accounting for 20-25% of the nosocomial infections worldwide. Multiple risk factors causing post-cesarean SSI have been documented. Despite most modern facilities and standard protocols of preoperative preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical site infections remain a major cause of hospital-acquired infections. Material and methods: This is a prospective observational study performed from January 2015 to June 2017 with 1304 patients as the study population. All these patients were thoroughly examined and investigated. Wound was checked on day 5 of LSCS and in patients with SSI, wound swab was sent for culture sensitivity. Risk factors contributing to the SSI were noted. The wound was graded according to Southampton's grading system and further treatment was done in accordance to the grade of wound and the culture sensitivity report. Results:  1304 were LSCS patients who were eligible for analysis, of which 43 patients developed surgical site infection which was 3.29% wound infection rate, of which 69% were emergency and 31% were elective. These patients were evaluated for risk factors and prolonged leaking per vaginum was the most common one. The wounds were graded according to Southampton's wound grading system and most wounds were found to be 3a subtype while E. coli was the organism most commonly detected amongst the 18 patients with a culture positive report.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A study of post-cesarean surgical site infections in a tertiary care unit Lassa fever: A recurring decimal in Plateau state, Nigeria Knowledge, attitude, practice of hand hygiene among nursing staff in medicine ICU in a tertiary health care centre in Western India Evaluation of Serum Creatine Phosphokinase as a Marker of Severity in Organophosphorus Poisoning Yellow fever outbreak in Plateau state, Nigeria: A re-emerging disease or a case of misdiagnosis over the years?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1