创伤患者早期插管管理:1000例连续患者的适应症和结果。

M. Sise, S. Shackford, C. Sise, Daniel I. Sack, G. Paci, Randy S. Yale, Eamon B. OʼReilly, Valerie C. Norton, Benjamin R. Huebner, Kimberly A. Peck
{"title":"创伤患者早期插管管理:1000例连续患者的适应症和结果。","authors":"M. Sise, S. Shackford, C. Sise, Daniel I. Sack, G. Paci, Randy S. Yale, Eamon B. OʼReilly, Valerie C. Norton, Benjamin R. Huebner, Kimberly A. Peck","doi":"10.1097/TA.0b013e318191bb0c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guidelines identify indications (EI) for early intubation. However, EI have not been clinically validated. Many intubations are performed for other discretionary indications (DI). We evaluated early intubation to assess the incidence and outcomes of those performed for both EI and DI. METHODS One thousand consecutive intubations performed in the first 2 hours after arrival at our Level I trauma center were reviewed. Indications, outcomes, and trauma surgeon (TS) intubation rates were evaluated. RESULTS During a 56-month period, 1,000 (9.9%) of 10,137 trauma patients were intubated within 2 hours of arrival. DI were present in 444 (44.4%) and EI in 556 (55.6%). DI were combativeness or altered mental status in 375 (84.5%), airway or respiratory problems in 21 (4.7%), and preoperative management in 48 (10.8%). Injury Severity Score was 14.6 in DI patients and 22.7 in EI patients (p < 0.001). Predicted versus observed survival was 96.6% versus 95.9% in DI patients and 75.2% versus 75.0% in EI patients (p < 0.001). Head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of >or=3 occurred in 32.7% with DI and 52.0% with EI (p < 0.001). Seven (0.7%) surgical airways were performed; two for DI (0.2%). Eleven (1.1%) patients aspirated during intubation and five (0.5%) suffered oral trauma. There were no other significant complications of intubation for either DI or EI and complication rates were similar in the two groups. Delayed intubation (early intubation after leaving the trauma bay) was required in 67 (6.7%) patients and 59 (88.1%) were for combativeness, neurologic deterioration, or respiratory distress or airway problems. Intubation rates varied among TS from 7.6% to 15.3% (p < 0.001) and rates for DI ranged from 3.3% to 7.4% (p < 0.001). There was a statistically insignificant trend among TS with higher intubation rates to perform fewer delayed intubations. CONCLUSIONS Early intubation for EI as well as DI was safe and effective. One third of the DI patients had significant head injury. Surgical airways were rarely needed and delayed intubations were uncommon. The intubation rates for EI and DI varied significantly among TSs. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines may not identify all patients who would benefit from early intubation after injury.","PeriodicalId":92962,"journal":{"name":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","volume":"28 1","pages":"32-9; discussion 39-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early intubation in the management of trauma patients: indications and outcomes in 1,000 consecutive patients.\",\"authors\":\"M. Sise, S. Shackford, C. Sise, Daniel I. Sack, G. Paci, Randy S. Yale, Eamon B. OʼReilly, Valerie C. Norton, Benjamin R. Huebner, Kimberly A. Peck\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0b013e318191bb0c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guidelines identify indications (EI) for early intubation. However, EI have not been clinically validated. Many intubations are performed for other discretionary indications (DI). We evaluated early intubation to assess the incidence and outcomes of those performed for both EI and DI. METHODS One thousand consecutive intubations performed in the first 2 hours after arrival at our Level I trauma center were reviewed. Indications, outcomes, and trauma surgeon (TS) intubation rates were evaluated. RESULTS During a 56-month period, 1,000 (9.9%) of 10,137 trauma patients were intubated within 2 hours of arrival. DI were present in 444 (44.4%) and EI in 556 (55.6%). DI were combativeness or altered mental status in 375 (84.5%), airway or respiratory problems in 21 (4.7%), and preoperative management in 48 (10.8%). Injury Severity Score was 14.6 in DI patients and 22.7 in EI patients (p < 0.001). Predicted versus observed survival was 96.6% versus 95.9% in DI patients and 75.2% versus 75.0% in EI patients (p < 0.001). Head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of >or=3 occurred in 32.7% with DI and 52.0% with EI (p < 0.001). Seven (0.7%) surgical airways were performed; two for DI (0.2%). Eleven (1.1%) patients aspirated during intubation and five (0.5%) suffered oral trauma. There were no other significant complications of intubation for either DI or EI and complication rates were similar in the two groups. Delayed intubation (early intubation after leaving the trauma bay) was required in 67 (6.7%) patients and 59 (88.1%) were for combativeness, neurologic deterioration, or respiratory distress or airway problems. Intubation rates varied among TS from 7.6% to 15.3% (p < 0.001) and rates for DI ranged from 3.3% to 7.4% (p < 0.001). There was a statistically insignificant trend among TS with higher intubation rates to perform fewer delayed intubations. CONCLUSIONS Early intubation for EI as well as DI was safe and effective. One third of the DI patients had significant head injury. Surgical airways were rarely needed and delayed intubations were uncommon. The intubation rates for EI and DI varied significantly among TSs. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines may not identify all patients who would benefit from early intubation after injury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"32-9; discussion 39-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318191bb0c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318191bb0c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

背景:东部创伤外科实践管理指南协会确定早期插管的适应症(EI)。然而,EI尚未得到临床验证。许多插管是为其他酌情指征(DI)进行的。我们对早期插管进行评估,以评估EI和DI的发生率和结果。方法回顾性分析我院一级外伤中心收治的1000例患者入院后2小时内的连续插管情况。评估适应症、结果和创伤外科医生(TS)插管率。结果在56个月的时间里,10137例外伤患者中有1000例(9.9%)在入院后2小时内插管。DI 444例(44.4%),EI 556例(55.6%)。死亡原因为好斗或精神状态改变375例(84.5%),气道或呼吸问题21例(4.7%),术前管理48例(10.8%)。损伤严重程度评分分别为14.6分和22.7分(p < 0.001)。DI患者的预测生存率为96.6%对95.9%,EI患者的预测生存率为75.2%对75.0% (p < 0.001)。颅脑损伤量表评分>或=3分的分别为32.7%、52.0% (p < 0.001)。7例(0.7%)行手术气道;DI 2例(0.2%)。11例(1.1%)患者在插管时有误吸,5例(0.5%)患者有口腔外伤。两组均无其他明显插管并发症,并发症发生率相似。67例(6.7%)患者需要延迟插管(离开创伤室后早期插管),59例(88.1%)患者需要战斗、神经系统恶化、呼吸窘迫或气道问题。TS的插管率从7.6%到15.3%不等(p < 0.001), DI的插管率从3.3%到7.4%不等(p < 0.001)。插管率较高的TS患者延迟插管次数较少,差异无统计学意义。结论早期插管治疗EI和DI是安全有效的。三分之一的DI患者有明显的头部损伤。很少需要手术气道,延迟插管也不常见。TSs间EI和DI插管率差异显著。东部创伤外科协会指南可能无法确定所有在受伤后早期插管的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early intubation in the management of trauma patients: indications and outcomes in 1,000 consecutive patients.
BACKGROUND The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guidelines identify indications (EI) for early intubation. However, EI have not been clinically validated. Many intubations are performed for other discretionary indications (DI). We evaluated early intubation to assess the incidence and outcomes of those performed for both EI and DI. METHODS One thousand consecutive intubations performed in the first 2 hours after arrival at our Level I trauma center were reviewed. Indications, outcomes, and trauma surgeon (TS) intubation rates were evaluated. RESULTS During a 56-month period, 1,000 (9.9%) of 10,137 trauma patients were intubated within 2 hours of arrival. DI were present in 444 (44.4%) and EI in 556 (55.6%). DI were combativeness or altered mental status in 375 (84.5%), airway or respiratory problems in 21 (4.7%), and preoperative management in 48 (10.8%). Injury Severity Score was 14.6 in DI patients and 22.7 in EI patients (p < 0.001). Predicted versus observed survival was 96.6% versus 95.9% in DI patients and 75.2% versus 75.0% in EI patients (p < 0.001). Head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of >or=3 occurred in 32.7% with DI and 52.0% with EI (p < 0.001). Seven (0.7%) surgical airways were performed; two for DI (0.2%). Eleven (1.1%) patients aspirated during intubation and five (0.5%) suffered oral trauma. There were no other significant complications of intubation for either DI or EI and complication rates were similar in the two groups. Delayed intubation (early intubation after leaving the trauma bay) was required in 67 (6.7%) patients and 59 (88.1%) were for combativeness, neurologic deterioration, or respiratory distress or airway problems. Intubation rates varied among TS from 7.6% to 15.3% (p < 0.001) and rates for DI ranged from 3.3% to 7.4% (p < 0.001). There was a statistically insignificant trend among TS with higher intubation rates to perform fewer delayed intubations. CONCLUSIONS Early intubation for EI as well as DI was safe and effective. One third of the DI patients had significant head injury. Surgical airways were rarely needed and delayed intubations were uncommon. The intubation rates for EI and DI varied significantly among TSs. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines may not identify all patients who would benefit from early intubation after injury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimal invasive approach for rib fractures: Feasibility and safety in a single-center experience Is flail chest correctly defined: A new definition is suggested Factors associated with early complications of surgical management due to penetrating laryngotracheal trauma in Colombia Posttraumatic pulmonary abscess Postoperative outcomes following surgical stabilization of rib fractures stratified by 5-factor modified frailty index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1