试验方法对刨花板侧钉阻力的影响

N. Sekino, Misaki Seino
{"title":"试验方法对刨花板侧钉阻力的影响","authors":"N. Sekino, Misaki Seino","doi":"10.2488/JWRS.61.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulating a nail-joint of wood-based panel onto lumber, a new test method of lateral nail resistance (LNR) was devised. The test jig is a one-plane-shear (OPS) type that does not induce a compulsory pull-through of the nail head. The LNR of particleboard with a thickness of 12 and 15 mm was tested to compare this method and the two-plane-shear (TPS) type of test according to ASTM D 1037. The LNR by the OPS type was found to be forty to sixty percent of that by the TPS type. The rate of increase of LNR due to increase of nail edge distance (de) of nail from 12 up to 24 mm was lower in the OPS type than in the TPS type. There was no significant difference of LNR tested at two nail positions, at the center of the specimen’s width and at a corner, for both the OPS and TPS types in the range of de from 12 to 24 mm. The retention of LNR after two types of accelerated aging that combined water-soaking and drying was found to be two to ten percent higher in the OPS type than in the TPS type.","PeriodicalId":17248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Test Methods on Lateral Nail Resistance of Particleboards\",\"authors\":\"N. Sekino, Misaki Seino\",\"doi\":\"10.2488/JWRS.61.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Simulating a nail-joint of wood-based panel onto lumber, a new test method of lateral nail resistance (LNR) was devised. The test jig is a one-plane-shear (OPS) type that does not induce a compulsory pull-through of the nail head. The LNR of particleboard with a thickness of 12 and 15 mm was tested to compare this method and the two-plane-shear (TPS) type of test according to ASTM D 1037. The LNR by the OPS type was found to be forty to sixty percent of that by the TPS type. The rate of increase of LNR due to increase of nail edge distance (de) of nail from 12 up to 24 mm was lower in the OPS type than in the TPS type. There was no significant difference of LNR tested at two nail positions, at the center of the specimen’s width and at a corner, for both the OPS and TPS types in the range of de from 12 to 24 mm. The retention of LNR after two types of accelerated aging that combined water-soaking and drying was found to be two to ten percent higher in the OPS type than in the TPS type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2488/JWRS.61.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2488/JWRS.61.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

模拟人造板与木材的钉接,设计了一种新的侧钉阻力测试方法。测试夹具是单面剪切(OPS)型,不会导致钉头的强制拉通。对厚度为12 mm和15 mm的刨花板的LNR进行了测试,并根据ASTM D 1037将该方法与双平面剪切(TPS)类型的测试进行了比较。发现OPS类型的LNR是TPS类型的40%到60%。钉边距(de)从12 mm增加到24 mm时,OPS型的LNR增长率低于TPS型。在12 ~ 24 mm范围内,OPS和TPS两种钉位、试件宽度中心和角落处的LNR测试结果无显著差异。经浸水和干燥两种加速老化后的LNR保留率,OPS型比TPS型高2% ~ 10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Test Methods on Lateral Nail Resistance of Particleboards
Simulating a nail-joint of wood-based panel onto lumber, a new test method of lateral nail resistance (LNR) was devised. The test jig is a one-plane-shear (OPS) type that does not induce a compulsory pull-through of the nail head. The LNR of particleboard with a thickness of 12 and 15 mm was tested to compare this method and the two-plane-shear (TPS) type of test according to ASTM D 1037. The LNR by the OPS type was found to be forty to sixty percent of that by the TPS type. The rate of increase of LNR due to increase of nail edge distance (de) of nail from 12 up to 24 mm was lower in the OPS type than in the TPS type. There was no significant difference of LNR tested at two nail positions, at the center of the specimen’s width and at a corner, for both the OPS and TPS types in the range of de from 12 to 24 mm. The retention of LNR after two types of accelerated aging that combined water-soaking and drying was found to be two to ten percent higher in the OPS type than in the TPS type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
バスーンリード用葦材( Arundo donax )の表皮色と振動特性の関係 Relationship between the Vertical Load Properties of Floors and Human Sensory Evaluations of Walking Vibration in Wooden Schools and Offices II.: Possibility of a tentative design target for large-span wooden floors according to human sensory evaluations of walking vibration@@@歩行振動の感覚評価による木造大スパン床の設計 成長に伴うモウソウチク(Phyllostachys pubescens)の物性発現機構(第2報) Fundamental Research of an Evaluation Method of Splitting Failure in Timber I.: Differences of wood species and evaluation method of splitting failure by the CT test specimen@@@CT試験における樹種の差異と耐力推定法 Nondestructive Evaluation of Water-based Polymer-isocyanate Adhesive Distribution in Glued Laminated Timber Using X-rays
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1