尼日利亚一家机构中癌症患者营养不良的发生率

A. Ntekim, O. Folasire, A. Folasire
{"title":"尼日利亚一家机构中癌症患者营养不良的发生率","authors":"A. Ntekim, O. Folasire, A. Folasire","doi":"10.6000/1927-7229.2017.06.02.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Cancer is a major health problem. Successful management includes adequate supportive care. Nutritional problems are common among cancer patients and these are not routinely addressed by oncologists during oncology care leading to suboptimal outcome even in developed countries. In Nigeria and other low and medium income countries, the situation is worse as nutritional screening and assessment of cancer patients are not routinely carried out. Objectives : To determine the proportion of cancer patients at risk of malnutrition and compare convergence of risk assessment using SGA and MUST tools. Methods : This was a prospective study carried out among cancer patients who presented for cancer care in the Department of Radiation Oncology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria. Nutritional assessment tools which included Malnutrition Universal Scoring Tool (MUST) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) were used to assess the nutritional status of the participants. Results : A total of 89 patients aged between 18 and 85 years participated in the study. The number of males were 13 (15%) while females were 76(85%). In our study 54 (60.8%) of our patients were at risk of malnutrition using the malnutrition universal scoring tool (MUST) scale while 53(60%) were malnourished using the subjective global assessment (SGA) scale. The reliability for the classifications using the MUST and SGA scales was positive (moderate) [Kappa = 0.584 (p<0.0005), 95% CI (0.410, 0.758)]. Conclusion : There is a high proportion of clinical malnutrition among cancer patients in the study population. According to this study, there was similarity between the classifications of nutritional risk, using the MUST and SGA tools.","PeriodicalId":14957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Malnutrition among Cancer Patients in a Nigerian Institution\",\"authors\":\"A. Ntekim, O. Folasire, A. Folasire\",\"doi\":\"10.6000/1927-7229.2017.06.02.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : Cancer is a major health problem. Successful management includes adequate supportive care. Nutritional problems are common among cancer patients and these are not routinely addressed by oncologists during oncology care leading to suboptimal outcome even in developed countries. In Nigeria and other low and medium income countries, the situation is worse as nutritional screening and assessment of cancer patients are not routinely carried out. Objectives : To determine the proportion of cancer patients at risk of malnutrition and compare convergence of risk assessment using SGA and MUST tools. Methods : This was a prospective study carried out among cancer patients who presented for cancer care in the Department of Radiation Oncology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria. Nutritional assessment tools which included Malnutrition Universal Scoring Tool (MUST) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) were used to assess the nutritional status of the participants. Results : A total of 89 patients aged between 18 and 85 years participated in the study. The number of males were 13 (15%) while females were 76(85%). In our study 54 (60.8%) of our patients were at risk of malnutrition using the malnutrition universal scoring tool (MUST) scale while 53(60%) were malnourished using the subjective global assessment (SGA) scale. The reliability for the classifications using the MUST and SGA scales was positive (moderate) [Kappa = 0.584 (p<0.0005), 95% CI (0.410, 0.758)]. Conclusion : There is a high proportion of clinical malnutrition among cancer patients in the study population. According to this study, there was similarity between the classifications of nutritional risk, using the MUST and SGA tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"117-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-7229.2017.06.02.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-7229.2017.06.02.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症是一个主要的健康问题。成功的管理包括充分的支持性护理。营养问题在癌症患者中很常见,即使在发达国家,肿瘤医生在肿瘤治疗过程中也没有常规地解决这些问题,导致结果不理想。在尼日利亚和其他低收入和中等收入国家,情况更糟,因为没有对癌症患者进行常规的营养筛查和评估。目的:确定有营养不良风险的癌症患者的比例,并比较使用SGA和MUST工具进行风险评估的收敛性。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,在尼日利亚伊巴丹大学学院医院放射肿瘤科接受癌症治疗的癌症患者中进行。营养评估工具包括营养不良通用评分工具(MUST)和主观整体评估(SGA)来评估参与者的营养状况。结果:共有89例患者参与研究,年龄在18 ~ 85岁之间。男性13人(15%),女性76人(85%)。在我们的研究中,使用营养不良通用评分工具(MUST)量表,54例(60.8%)患者存在营养不良风险,而使用主观整体评估(SGA)量表,53例(60%)患者存在营养不良风险。使用MUST和SGA量表进行分类的信度为正(中等)[Kappa = 0.584 (p<0.0005), 95% CI(0.410, 0.758)]。结论:研究人群中肿瘤患者临床营养不良比例较高。根据本研究,使用MUST和SGA工具进行营养风险分类之间存在相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of Malnutrition among Cancer Patients in a Nigerian Institution
Background : Cancer is a major health problem. Successful management includes adequate supportive care. Nutritional problems are common among cancer patients and these are not routinely addressed by oncologists during oncology care leading to suboptimal outcome even in developed countries. In Nigeria and other low and medium income countries, the situation is worse as nutritional screening and assessment of cancer patients are not routinely carried out. Objectives : To determine the proportion of cancer patients at risk of malnutrition and compare convergence of risk assessment using SGA and MUST tools. Methods : This was a prospective study carried out among cancer patients who presented for cancer care in the Department of Radiation Oncology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria. Nutritional assessment tools which included Malnutrition Universal Scoring Tool (MUST) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) were used to assess the nutritional status of the participants. Results : A total of 89 patients aged between 18 and 85 years participated in the study. The number of males were 13 (15%) while females were 76(85%). In our study 54 (60.8%) of our patients were at risk of malnutrition using the malnutrition universal scoring tool (MUST) scale while 53(60%) were malnourished using the subjective global assessment (SGA) scale. The reliability for the classifications using the MUST and SGA scales was positive (moderate) [Kappa = 0.584 (p<0.0005), 95% CI (0.410, 0.758)]. Conclusion : There is a high proportion of clinical malnutrition among cancer patients in the study population. According to this study, there was similarity between the classifications of nutritional risk, using the MUST and SGA tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Insights on Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Cancer Chemically Induced Brain Cancer in Sprague-Dawley Rats: Changed Lipidomics Mimics the Human Conditions Multiple Primary Malignant Tumours Magnetotherapy in Experimental and Clinical Neuro-Oncology: A Review Uterine Metastasis from Carcinoma of Breast – A Systematic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1