知道极限:阿德里安娜·里奇在押韵

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1215/0041462x-7995612
Florian Gargaillo
{"title":"知道极限:阿德里安娜·里奇在押韵","authors":"Florian Gargaillo","doi":"10.1215/0041462x-7995612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Adrienne Rich's early poems have long been criticized for their apparent stylistic conservatism. Reconsidering Rich's first two volumes, this essay aims to offer a new understanding of their place in her poetic development as a whole. Far from traditional forms functioning for her as mere inhibitions, stylistic constraints provided Rich with patterns she could play with and against. In turn, formal rules allowed her to think critically about different social and political limits. This article hopes to encourage a more nuanced appreciation of Rich's formalist period, highlight its continuities with her later work, and complicate the terms though which understandings of her first poems have been oversimplified—deemed narrowly \"conservative\" as opposed to \"radical.\"","PeriodicalId":44252,"journal":{"name":"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE","volume":"38 1","pages":"393 - 410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing Limits: Adrienne Rich in Rhyme\",\"authors\":\"Florian Gargaillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/0041462x-7995612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Adrienne Rich's early poems have long been criticized for their apparent stylistic conservatism. Reconsidering Rich's first two volumes, this essay aims to offer a new understanding of their place in her poetic development as a whole. Far from traditional forms functioning for her as mere inhibitions, stylistic constraints provided Rich with patterns she could play with and against. In turn, formal rules allowed her to think critically about different social and political limits. This article hopes to encourage a more nuanced appreciation of Rich's formalist period, highlight its continuities with her later work, and complicate the terms though which understandings of her first poems have been oversimplified—deemed narrowly \\\"conservative\\\" as opposed to \\\"radical.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":44252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"393 - 410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462x-7995612\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462x-7995612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:阿德里安娜·里奇的早期诗歌因其明显的风格保守而长期受到批评。重新考虑里奇的前两卷,这篇文章旨在提供一个新的理解,他们在她的诗歌发展作为一个整体的位置。对她来说,传统的形式不仅仅是一种抑制,风格上的限制为Rich提供了她可以玩和反对的模式。反过来,正式的规则使她能够批判性地思考不同的社会和政治限制。本文希望鼓励人们对里奇的形式主义时期进行更细致入微的欣赏,强调其与她后来作品的连续性,并使对她的第一首诗的理解过于简单化——被狭隘地认为是“保守”而不是“激进”——的术语复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowing Limits: Adrienne Rich in Rhyme
Abstract:Adrienne Rich's early poems have long been criticized for their apparent stylistic conservatism. Reconsidering Rich's first two volumes, this essay aims to offer a new understanding of their place in her poetic development as a whole. Far from traditional forms functioning for her as mere inhibitions, stylistic constraints provided Rich with patterns she could play with and against. In turn, formal rules allowed her to think critically about different social and political limits. This article hopes to encourage a more nuanced appreciation of Rich's formalist period, highlight its continuities with her later work, and complicate the terms though which understandings of her first poems have been oversimplified—deemed narrowly "conservative" as opposed to "radical."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Novel Sensations: Modernist Fiction and the Problem of Qualia, by Jon Day, Stories and the Brain: The Neuroscience of Narrative, by Paul B. Armstrong On the Andrew J. Kappel Prize Essay Lydia Davis’s Grammatical Examples Hegel after Ulysses? The (Dis)Appearance of Politics in “Cyclops” Standard Forms: Modernism, Market Research, and “Howl”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1