骨整合成功率的观察性研究:公共卫生机构对15483个种植体的前瞻性分析

SPG biomed Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.3390/biomed2040033
Butruz Sarkis Simão, Denis Damião Costa, M. C. Cangussú, B. Sotto-Maior, R. Devita, J. D. de Carvalho, Igor da Silva Brum
{"title":"骨整合成功率的观察性研究:公共卫生机构对15483个种植体的前瞻性分析","authors":"Butruz Sarkis Simão, Denis Damião Costa, M. C. Cangussú, B. Sotto-Maior, R. Devita, J. D. de Carvalho, Igor da Silva Brum","doi":"10.3390/biomed2040033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The osseointegration process between the host’s bone tissue and the titanium implant is the key to success of implantology. The literature highlights the high success rate of osseointegrated implants, which is above 90%, and warns that some failures may occur, and every professional may face some inevitable failure. A longitudinal study was designed to evaluate the success rate of osseointegrated implants by taking into account the early failure of osseointegration. The study’s population included a convenience sample of all patients attending in four municipalities in the state of Paraíba, Brazil, belonging to the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) and those who underwent implant placements between November 2015 and November 2018 and were followed-up until March 2020. Data were extracted from the National Registry of Health Establishments (CNES), a database that contains data on all Brazilian health institutions. Of the total placed implants, 1.88% failed before prosthetic rehabilitation, corresponding to a success rate of 98.12%. The success and failure rates by anatomical region were also evaluated, which revealed, respectively, the values for the anterior maxilla (95.52% and 4.48%), posterior maxilla (97.53% and 2.47%), anterior mandible (97.13% and 2.87%), and posterior mandible (98.90% and 1.10%). We conclude that the posterior mandible performed better than the other bone types and anatomical regions. The anterior region of the maxilla was the one that presented the worst performance. Moreover, when compared, the posterior maxilla performed similarly to the anterior mandible and better than the anterior maxilla.","PeriodicalId":93816,"journal":{"name":"SPG biomed","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational Study on the Success Rate of Osseointegration: A Prospective Analysis of 15,483 Implants in a Public Health Setting\",\"authors\":\"Butruz Sarkis Simão, Denis Damião Costa, M. C. Cangussú, B. Sotto-Maior, R. Devita, J. D. de Carvalho, Igor da Silva Brum\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomed2040033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The osseointegration process between the host’s bone tissue and the titanium implant is the key to success of implantology. The literature highlights the high success rate of osseointegrated implants, which is above 90%, and warns that some failures may occur, and every professional may face some inevitable failure. A longitudinal study was designed to evaluate the success rate of osseointegrated implants by taking into account the early failure of osseointegration. The study’s population included a convenience sample of all patients attending in four municipalities in the state of Paraíba, Brazil, belonging to the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) and those who underwent implant placements between November 2015 and November 2018 and were followed-up until March 2020. Data were extracted from the National Registry of Health Establishments (CNES), a database that contains data on all Brazilian health institutions. Of the total placed implants, 1.88% failed before prosthetic rehabilitation, corresponding to a success rate of 98.12%. The success and failure rates by anatomical region were also evaluated, which revealed, respectively, the values for the anterior maxilla (95.52% and 4.48%), posterior maxilla (97.53% and 2.47%), anterior mandible (97.13% and 2.87%), and posterior mandible (98.90% and 1.10%). We conclude that the posterior mandible performed better than the other bone types and anatomical regions. The anterior region of the maxilla was the one that presented the worst performance. Moreover, when compared, the posterior maxilla performed similarly to the anterior mandible and better than the anterior maxilla.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPG biomed\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPG biomed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed2040033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPG biomed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed2040033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

宿主骨组织与钛种植体之间的骨融合过程是种植成功的关键。文献强调骨结合种植体的成功率很高,在90%以上,并警告可能会出现一些失败,每个专业人员都可能面临一些不可避免的失败。一项纵向研究旨在通过考虑早期骨结合失败来评估骨结合种植体的成功率。该研究的人群包括巴西Paraíba州四个城市的所有患者的便利样本,这些患者属于巴西统一卫生系统(SUS),以及2015年11月至2018年11月期间接受植入物放置的患者,并随访至2020年3月。数据摘自国家卫生机构登记处(CNES),这是一个包含巴西所有卫生机构数据的数据库。在放置的种植体中,1.88%的种植体在假肢康复前失败,成功率为98.12%。对不同解剖区域的成功率和失败率进行了比较,分别为上颌前(95.52%和4.48%)、上颌后(97.53%和2.47%)、下颌骨前(97.13%和2.87%)和下颌骨后(98.90%和1.10%)。我们的结论是,后下颌骨比其他骨类型和解剖区域表现更好。上颌前区是表现最差的区域。此外,当比较时,后上颌与前下颌骨相似,优于前上颌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observational Study on the Success Rate of Osseointegration: A Prospective Analysis of 15,483 Implants in a Public Health Setting
The osseointegration process between the host’s bone tissue and the titanium implant is the key to success of implantology. The literature highlights the high success rate of osseointegrated implants, which is above 90%, and warns that some failures may occur, and every professional may face some inevitable failure. A longitudinal study was designed to evaluate the success rate of osseointegrated implants by taking into account the early failure of osseointegration. The study’s population included a convenience sample of all patients attending in four municipalities in the state of Paraíba, Brazil, belonging to the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) and those who underwent implant placements between November 2015 and November 2018 and were followed-up until March 2020. Data were extracted from the National Registry of Health Establishments (CNES), a database that contains data on all Brazilian health institutions. Of the total placed implants, 1.88% failed before prosthetic rehabilitation, corresponding to a success rate of 98.12%. The success and failure rates by anatomical region were also evaluated, which revealed, respectively, the values for the anterior maxilla (95.52% and 4.48%), posterior maxilla (97.53% and 2.47%), anterior mandible (97.13% and 2.87%), and posterior mandible (98.90% and 1.10%). We conclude that the posterior mandible performed better than the other bone types and anatomical regions. The anterior region of the maxilla was the one that presented the worst performance. Moreover, when compared, the posterior maxilla performed similarly to the anterior mandible and better than the anterior maxilla.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Of Soldiers and Their Ghosts: Are We Ready for a Review of PTSD Evidence? Signs of Alveolar Collapse in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and Systemic Sclerosis Revealed by Inspiration and Expiration Computed Tomography Relationships between Oral Health and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Scoping Review Young vs. Old Population: Does Urban Environment of Skyscrapers Create Different Obesity Prevalence? Untreated Early Childhood Caries and Possible Links with Brain Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1