为高管离职安排金色告别:遣散费回顾与议程

IF 0.7 Q4 MANAGEMENT Irish Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1177/01492063231172181
Conor Callahan
{"title":"为高管离职安排金色告别:遣散费回顾与议程","authors":"Conor Callahan","doi":"10.1177/01492063231172181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While firms compensate executives in many ways, severance pay is perhaps the most controversial yet least understood form of executive compensation. In this study, we outline a review and agenda for severance pay owed if an executive is dismissed without cause from their role. Following changes to the disclosure of executive compensation in 2006, researchers have taken a renewed interest in studying executive severance pay. The current literature on this topic, however, has evolved along loosely connected research streams across multiple disciplines. This lack of integration presents a challenge for management scholars seeking to advance our knowledge of this important form of compensation. To address this issue, we provide an interdisciplinary review, incorporating recent studies that have taken advantage of the increased transparency of severance pay. Our review clarifies key differences between severance and other forms of executive pay and organizes prior studies along three main areas of research to draw conclusions about the current literature on this form of compensation. We also outline an agenda for future research, drawing upon several literatures that are key to management research—agency theory, managerial power theory, upper echelons theory, stakeholder theory, impression management theory, and the executive labor market. By integrating perspectives that, while less common in related fields, are central to management research, we provide unique insights for future research. Finally, we discuss key methodological issues, including data accuracy, measurement consistency, and analytical approaches, and how these can be addressed moving forward.","PeriodicalId":52018,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Management","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arranging Golden Goodbyes for Executive Exits: A Review and Agenda for Severance Pay\",\"authors\":\"Conor Callahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01492063231172181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While firms compensate executives in many ways, severance pay is perhaps the most controversial yet least understood form of executive compensation. In this study, we outline a review and agenda for severance pay owed if an executive is dismissed without cause from their role. Following changes to the disclosure of executive compensation in 2006, researchers have taken a renewed interest in studying executive severance pay. The current literature on this topic, however, has evolved along loosely connected research streams across multiple disciplines. This lack of integration presents a challenge for management scholars seeking to advance our knowledge of this important form of compensation. To address this issue, we provide an interdisciplinary review, incorporating recent studies that have taken advantage of the increased transparency of severance pay. Our review clarifies key differences between severance and other forms of executive pay and organizes prior studies along three main areas of research to draw conclusions about the current literature on this form of compensation. We also outline an agenda for future research, drawing upon several literatures that are key to management research—agency theory, managerial power theory, upper echelons theory, stakeholder theory, impression management theory, and the executive labor market. By integrating perspectives that, while less common in related fields, are central to management research, we provide unique insights for future research. Finally, we discuss key methodological issues, including data accuracy, measurement consistency, and analytical approaches, and how these can be addressed moving forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231172181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231172181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然公司以多种方式补偿高管,但遣散费可能是最具争议但也最不为人所知的高管薪酬形式。在这项研究中,我们概述了一项审查和议程,如果一名高管被无故解雇,就应支付遣散费。在2006年高管薪酬披露发生变化之后,研究人员重新对研究高管遣散费产生了兴趣。然而,目前关于这一主题的文献是沿着跨多个学科的松散连接的研究流发展而来的。这种缺乏整合的现象,给那些寻求增进我们对这种重要薪酬形式的认识的管理学者带来了挑战。为了解决这个问题,我们提供了一个跨学科的回顾,结合了最近的研究,这些研究利用了遣散费透明度的提高。我们的回顾澄清了遣散费和其他形式的高管薪酬之间的主要区别,并根据三个主要研究领域组织了之前的研究,以得出有关这种形式的薪酬的当前文献的结论。我们还概述了未来研究的议程,借鉴了管理研究的几个关键文献——代理理论、管理权力理论、上层理论、利益相关者理论、印象管理理论和行政劳动力市场。通过整合在相关领域不太常见但对管理研究至关重要的观点,我们为未来的研究提供了独特的见解。最后,我们讨论了关键的方法学问题,包括数据准确性、测量一致性和分析方法,以及如何解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arranging Golden Goodbyes for Executive Exits: A Review and Agenda for Severance Pay
While firms compensate executives in many ways, severance pay is perhaps the most controversial yet least understood form of executive compensation. In this study, we outline a review and agenda for severance pay owed if an executive is dismissed without cause from their role. Following changes to the disclosure of executive compensation in 2006, researchers have taken a renewed interest in studying executive severance pay. The current literature on this topic, however, has evolved along loosely connected research streams across multiple disciplines. This lack of integration presents a challenge for management scholars seeking to advance our knowledge of this important form of compensation. To address this issue, we provide an interdisciplinary review, incorporating recent studies that have taken advantage of the increased transparency of severance pay. Our review clarifies key differences between severance and other forms of executive pay and organizes prior studies along three main areas of research to draw conclusions about the current literature on this form of compensation. We also outline an agenda for future research, drawing upon several literatures that are key to management research—agency theory, managerial power theory, upper echelons theory, stakeholder theory, impression management theory, and the executive labor market. By integrating perspectives that, while less common in related fields, are central to management research, we provide unique insights for future research. Finally, we discuss key methodological issues, including data accuracy, measurement consistency, and analytical approaches, and how these can be addressed moving forward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Give Peace a Chance? How Regulatory Foci Influence Organizational Conflict Events in Intractable Conflict Environments. Mental health disclosure in the workplace – An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the employee experience Oh the Anxiety! The Anxiety of Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality and Mitigating Effects of Ethical Leadership Geographic Distance and State's Grip: Information Asymmetry, State Inattention, and Firm Implementation of State Policy From Home to Corner Office: How Work–Life Programs Influence Women's Managerial Representation in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1