老年糖尿病患者的定时起跑表现:与感觉运动功能、平衡、认知和跌倒的关系

IF 0.1 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS International Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i2/655
Asha H. Wettasinghe, D. Dissanayake, P. Katulanda, S. Lord
{"title":"老年糖尿病患者的定时起跑表现:与感觉运动功能、平衡、认知和跌倒的关系","authors":"Asha H. Wettasinghe, D. Dissanayake, P. Katulanda, S. Lord","doi":"10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i2/655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Timed up and Go Test (TUG) is often used as a mobility measure in older people. However, it is unclear whether the TUG is useful for identifying fall risk in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and which physical and cognitive/psychological factors influence the performance of this test. Objectives: To investigate whether slow TUG times (standard test and when performed with a secondary cognitive task (c-TUG)) are a risk factor for falls in older people with DM and to determine the relative contributions of a range of sensorimotor, balance and cognitive/psychological factors to TUG performance in this population. Methods: Community-dwelling people (n=103, mean age 61.57, SD=6.3) underwent the TUG and c-TUG tests as well as quantitative tests of vision, peripheral sensation, strength, reaction time, balance, cognition, and fear of falling. Participants were then followed up for falls for six months. Results: Negative binomial regression analyses revealed that each 1s increase in TUG and c-TUG times increased the risk of falling by 29% and 13%, respectively. Multiple regression analyses identified vibration sense (p<0.001), knee extension strength (p=0.001, r2=0.430), edge contrast sensitivity (p=0.002), neuropathy examination score (p=0.001, r2=0.498) and controlled leaning balance (p=0.033) as significant and independent explanatory predictors of TUG performance. The regression model for c-TUG was similar, vibration sense (p=0.042), knee extension strength (p=0.009, r2=0.256), neuropathy examination score (p=0.156, r2=0.272) and sway path-floor (p=0.042) except that the MOCA cognitive assessment (p=0.015) was included instead of edge contrast sensitivity. The combined explanatory variable models explained 43% and 26% of the variance in TUG and c-TUG times, respectively. Conclusions: Slow TUG and c-TUG times significantly increased the risk of falls in community-dwelling older people with DM. Poor TUG and c-TUG performances were related independently to decreased vibration sense, lower limb weakness, and poor balance, with the c-TUG additionally influenced by cognitive function.","PeriodicalId":42989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TIMED UP AND GO PERFORMANCE IN OLDER PEOPLE WITH DIABETES MELLITUS: ASSOCIATIONS WITH SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION, BALANCE, COGNITION, AND FALLS\",\"authors\":\"Asha H. Wettasinghe, D. Dissanayake, P. Katulanda, S. Lord\",\"doi\":\"10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i2/655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Timed up and Go Test (TUG) is often used as a mobility measure in older people. However, it is unclear whether the TUG is useful for identifying fall risk in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and which physical and cognitive/psychological factors influence the performance of this test. Objectives: To investigate whether slow TUG times (standard test and when performed with a secondary cognitive task (c-TUG)) are a risk factor for falls in older people with DM and to determine the relative contributions of a range of sensorimotor, balance and cognitive/psychological factors to TUG performance in this population. Methods: Community-dwelling people (n=103, mean age 61.57, SD=6.3) underwent the TUG and c-TUG tests as well as quantitative tests of vision, peripheral sensation, strength, reaction time, balance, cognition, and fear of falling. Participants were then followed up for falls for six months. Results: Negative binomial regression analyses revealed that each 1s increase in TUG and c-TUG times increased the risk of falling by 29% and 13%, respectively. Multiple regression analyses identified vibration sense (p<0.001), knee extension strength (p=0.001, r2=0.430), edge contrast sensitivity (p=0.002), neuropathy examination score (p=0.001, r2=0.498) and controlled leaning balance (p=0.033) as significant and independent explanatory predictors of TUG performance. The regression model for c-TUG was similar, vibration sense (p=0.042), knee extension strength (p=0.009, r2=0.256), neuropathy examination score (p=0.156, r2=0.272) and sway path-floor (p=0.042) except that the MOCA cognitive assessment (p=0.015) was included instead of edge contrast sensitivity. The combined explanatory variable models explained 43% and 26% of the variance in TUG and c-TUG times, respectively. Conclusions: Slow TUG and c-TUG times significantly increased the risk of falls in community-dwelling older people with DM. Poor TUG and c-TUG performances were related independently to decreased vibration sense, lower limb weakness, and poor balance, with the c-TUG additionally influenced by cognitive function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i2/655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i2/655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:在老年人中,计时起床测试(TUG)常被用作一种活动能力测量。然而,目前尚不清楚TUG是否有助于识别糖尿病患者的跌倒风险,以及哪些生理和认知/心理因素会影响这项测试的表现。目的:调查拖船时间慢(标准测试和辅助认知任务(c-TUG))是否是老年糖尿病患者跌倒的危险因素,并确定一系列感觉运动、平衡和认知/心理因素对该人群拖船表现的相对贡献。方法:103名社区居民(n=103,平均年龄61.57,SD=6.3)进行TUG和c-TUG测试,并进行视力、外周感觉、力量、反应时间、平衡、认知和跌倒恐惧的定量测试。然后对参与者进行为期六个月的跌倒跟踪调查。结果:负二项回归分析显示,TUG和c-TUG次数每增加15次,跌倒的风险分别增加29%和13%。多元回归分析发现,振动感(p<0.001)、膝关节伸展强度(p=0.001, r2=0.430)、边缘对比敏感度(p=0.002)、神经病变检查评分(p=0.001, r2=0.498)和控制倾斜平衡(p=0.033)是TUG成绩显著且独立的解释预测因素。c-TUG的回归模型相似,振动感(p=0.042)、膝关节伸展强度(p=0.009, r2=0.256)、神经病变检查评分(p=0.156, r2=0.272)和摇摆路径地板(p=0.042),只是MOCA认知评估(p=0.015)取代了边缘对比敏感度。联合解释变量模型分别解释了TUG和c-TUG时间方差的43%和26%。结论:慢的TUG和c-TUG时间显著增加了社区居住老年糖尿病患者跌倒的风险。TUG和c-TUG表现不佳与振动感下降、下肢无力和平衡能力差独立相关,c-TUG还受认知功能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TIMED UP AND GO PERFORMANCE IN OLDER PEOPLE WITH DIABETES MELLITUS: ASSOCIATIONS WITH SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION, BALANCE, COGNITION, AND FALLS
Background: The Timed up and Go Test (TUG) is often used as a mobility measure in older people. However, it is unclear whether the TUG is useful for identifying fall risk in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and which physical and cognitive/psychological factors influence the performance of this test. Objectives: To investigate whether slow TUG times (standard test and when performed with a secondary cognitive task (c-TUG)) are a risk factor for falls in older people with DM and to determine the relative contributions of a range of sensorimotor, balance and cognitive/psychological factors to TUG performance in this population. Methods: Community-dwelling people (n=103, mean age 61.57, SD=6.3) underwent the TUG and c-TUG tests as well as quantitative tests of vision, peripheral sensation, strength, reaction time, balance, cognition, and fear of falling. Participants were then followed up for falls for six months. Results: Negative binomial regression analyses revealed that each 1s increase in TUG and c-TUG times increased the risk of falling by 29% and 13%, respectively. Multiple regression analyses identified vibration sense (p<0.001), knee extension strength (p=0.001, r2=0.430), edge contrast sensitivity (p=0.002), neuropathy examination score (p=0.001, r2=0.498) and controlled leaning balance (p=0.033) as significant and independent explanatory predictors of TUG performance. The regression model for c-TUG was similar, vibration sense (p=0.042), knee extension strength (p=0.009, r2=0.256), neuropathy examination score (p=0.156, r2=0.272) and sway path-floor (p=0.042) except that the MOCA cognitive assessment (p=0.015) was included instead of edge contrast sensitivity. The combined explanatory variable models explained 43% and 26% of the variance in TUG and c-TUG times, respectively. Conclusions: Slow TUG and c-TUG times significantly increased the risk of falls in community-dwelling older people with DM. Poor TUG and c-TUG performances were related independently to decreased vibration sense, lower limb weakness, and poor balance, with the c-TUG additionally influenced by cognitive function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Mc Gill Pain Questionnaire: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation Study in Chronic Neck Pain" "Incidence of Lower Limb Lymphedema in Post therapeutic Gynaecological Malignancies" "Comparative Effect of Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy, Proprioceptive Training and Task-Oriented Training on Functions of Upper Extremity among Stroke Patients" "Risk-Taking and Risk of Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review" "Correlation of Self-Reported and Performance-Based Measures In Patients With Non-Traumatic Stiff Shoulder Pathologies: An Observational Study"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1