亲密伴侣的力量

X. Anqi
{"title":"亲密伴侣的力量","authors":"X. Anqi","doi":"10.2753/CSA0009-4625430402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of comparing and reflecting on diverse measurements of conjugal powers, this study uses \"who, on the whole, wields more powers of decision in the household\" as the dependent variable, and operationalizes the resources hypothesis, the analysis of cultural norms, the theory of marriage dependence and satisfaction, and the process perspective of power as multidimensional interpretational variables. The results of analyzing urban and rural samples in China's Shanghai and Lanzhou indicate that socioeconomic resources such as education and income had no great significance between spouses, and that interviewees who contributed more efforts to the household, were good housekeepers, and received more support from relatives wielded more powers of decision. The party who depends upon and needs marriage is more willing to forgo family powers. Local subcultural and cultural norms have a significant influence on conjugal powers. However, parties who wield greater family powers do not necessarily express satisfaction with their gender equality in the family; the individual's autonomous power rather than relative power is more predictive of satisfaction with gender equality.","PeriodicalId":84447,"journal":{"name":"Chinese sociology and anthropology","volume":"53 1","pages":"24 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Powers of Intimate Companions\",\"authors\":\"X. Anqi\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/CSA0009-4625430402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the basis of comparing and reflecting on diverse measurements of conjugal powers, this study uses \\\"who, on the whole, wields more powers of decision in the household\\\" as the dependent variable, and operationalizes the resources hypothesis, the analysis of cultural norms, the theory of marriage dependence and satisfaction, and the process perspective of power as multidimensional interpretational variables. The results of analyzing urban and rural samples in China's Shanghai and Lanzhou indicate that socioeconomic resources such as education and income had no great significance between spouses, and that interviewees who contributed more efforts to the household, were good housekeepers, and received more support from relatives wielded more powers of decision. The party who depends upon and needs marriage is more willing to forgo family powers. Local subcultural and cultural norms have a significant influence on conjugal powers. However, parties who wield greater family powers do not necessarily express satisfaction with their gender equality in the family; the individual's autonomous power rather than relative power is more predictive of satisfaction with gender equality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese sociology and anthropology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"24 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese sociology and anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA0009-4625430402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese sociology and anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA0009-4625430402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究在比较和反思夫妻权力的各种测量方法的基础上,以“谁在家庭中总体上拥有更多的决策权”为因变量,运用资源假设、文化规范分析、婚姻依赖与满意度理论、权力过程视角作为多维解释变量。对中国上海和兰州城市和农村样本的分析结果表明,教育和收入等社会经济资源对配偶之间的影响不显著,对家庭贡献更多、家务管理好、得到亲戚支持的受访者拥有更大的决策权。依赖并需要婚姻的一方更愿意放弃家庭权力。地方亚文化和文化规范对夫妻权力有重大影响。然而,拥有更大家庭权力的一方并不一定对他们在家庭中的性别平等表示满意;个体的自主权力比相对权力更能预测性别平等满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Powers of Intimate Companions
On the basis of comparing and reflecting on diverse measurements of conjugal powers, this study uses "who, on the whole, wields more powers of decision in the household" as the dependent variable, and operationalizes the resources hypothesis, the analysis of cultural norms, the theory of marriage dependence and satisfaction, and the process perspective of power as multidimensional interpretational variables. The results of analyzing urban and rural samples in China's Shanghai and Lanzhou indicate that socioeconomic resources such as education and income had no great significance between spouses, and that interviewees who contributed more efforts to the household, were good housekeepers, and received more support from relatives wielded more powers of decision. The party who depends upon and needs marriage is more willing to forgo family powers. Local subcultural and cultural norms have a significant influence on conjugal powers. However, parties who wield greater family powers do not necessarily express satisfaction with their gender equality in the family; the individual's autonomous power rather than relative power is more predictive of satisfaction with gender equality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Development of the Ideology of Enlightenment in China (From the Seventeenth to the Early Nineteenth Century) Social Problems in Contemporary Chinese Society Why Young Women Are Shying Away from Jobs in Textile Mills The Inevitable Trend and Main Channels of the Transfer of China's Agricultural Labor Place Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1