匿名数据库的私有更新

Alberto Trombetta, E. Bertino
{"title":"匿名数据库的私有更新","authors":"Alberto Trombetta, E. Bertino","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.2006.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suppose that Alice, owner of a k-anonymous database, needs to determine whether her database, when adjoined with a tuple owned by Bob, is still k-anonymous. Suppose moreover that access to the database is strictly controlled, because for example data are used for experiments that need to be maintained confidential. Clearly, allowing Alice to directly read the contents of the tuple breaks the privacy of Bob; on the other hand, the confidentiality of the database managed by Alice is violated once Bob has access to the contents of the database. Thus the problem is to check whether the database adjoined with the tuple is still k-anonymous, without letting Alice and Bob know the contents of, respectively, the tuple and the database. In this paper, we propose two protocols solving this problem.","PeriodicalId":6819,"journal":{"name":"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Updates to Anonymous Databases\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Trombetta, E. Bertino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDE.2006.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Suppose that Alice, owner of a k-anonymous database, needs to determine whether her database, when adjoined with a tuple owned by Bob, is still k-anonymous. Suppose moreover that access to the database is strictly controlled, because for example data are used for experiments that need to be maintained confidential. Clearly, allowing Alice to directly read the contents of the tuple breaks the privacy of Bob; on the other hand, the confidentiality of the database managed by Alice is violated once Bob has access to the contents of the database. Thus the problem is to check whether the database adjoined with the tuple is still k-anonymous, without letting Alice and Bob know the contents of, respectively, the tuple and the database. In this paper, we propose two protocols solving this problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2006.117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2006.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

假设Alice是一个k匿名数据库的所有者,当她的数据库与Bob拥有的元组相连时,她需要确定她的数据库是否仍然是k匿名的。此外,假设对数据库的访问受到严格控制,例如,因为数据用于需要保密的实验。显然,允许Alice直接读取元组的内容会破坏Bob的隐私;另一方面,一旦Bob访问了数据库的内容,Alice管理的数据库的机密性就被侵犯了。因此,问题是检查与元组相连的数据库是否仍然是k-匿名的,而不让Alice和Bob分别知道元组和数据库的内容。在本文中,我们提出了两个协议来解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Private Updates to Anonymous Databases
Suppose that Alice, owner of a k-anonymous database, needs to determine whether her database, when adjoined with a tuple owned by Bob, is still k-anonymous. Suppose moreover that access to the database is strictly controlled, because for example data are used for experiments that need to be maintained confidential. Clearly, allowing Alice to directly read the contents of the tuple breaks the privacy of Bob; on the other hand, the confidentiality of the database managed by Alice is violated once Bob has access to the contents of the database. Thus the problem is to check whether the database adjoined with the tuple is still k-anonymous, without letting Alice and Bob know the contents of, respectively, the tuple and the database. In this paper, we propose two protocols solving this problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Approach to Adaptive Memory Management in Data Stream Systems Revision Processing in a Stream Processing Engine: A High-Level Design SUBSKY: Efficient Computation of Skylines in Subspaces How to Determine a Good Multi-Programming Level for External Scheduling Warehousing and Analyzing Massive RFID Data Sets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1