Luis W Dominguez, Brandon Beattie, Alexander Poulose
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间支付者组合对急诊和初级保健利用的影响","authors":"Luis W Dominguez, Brandon Beattie, Alexander Poulose","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-571738/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n BackgroundHealthcare utilization has changed dramatically during the COVID-19 crisis with the most dramatic drops coming in April 2020. While a lot of research has focused on utilization among the privately insured, or on comparing specialty-visits, comparatively less has been published on the effect of payer-mix, particularly Medicaid, on utilization. MethodsMonthly patient volume was gathered across 3 ambulatory primary and urgent care clinics. The timeframe included appointments, walk-ins and virtual visits from January through June 2020, including the nadir in April. Patient volume was then compared to average payer mix over that same time, at each clinic. A simple linear regression was then run, comparing changes in patient volume and percent Medicaid. ResultsTwo clinics had similar payer mixes, and saw similar decreases in utilization. A third clinic with twice as many Medicaid patients, saw only half the reduction in patient volume, during the nadir in April 2020. ConclusionGiven the limited number of data points, a more robust statistical analysis was not possible. A simple regression line indicated a correlation between the proportion of Medicaid patients and demand resilience for healthcare resources. At scale, the Medicaid population may be less vulnerable to variations in utilization, exhibiting less elastic demand, despite a pandemic, for a myriad of reasons.","PeriodicalId":8282,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Internal Medicine Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Payer-Mix on Utilization during the COVID-19 Pandemic, in Urgent and Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Luis W Dominguez, Brandon Beattie, Alexander Poulose\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/RS.3.RS-571738/V1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n BackgroundHealthcare utilization has changed dramatically during the COVID-19 crisis with the most dramatic drops coming in April 2020. While a lot of research has focused on utilization among the privately insured, or on comparing specialty-visits, comparatively less has been published on the effect of payer-mix, particularly Medicaid, on utilization. MethodsMonthly patient volume was gathered across 3 ambulatory primary and urgent care clinics. The timeframe included appointments, walk-ins and virtual visits from January through June 2020, including the nadir in April. Patient volume was then compared to average payer mix over that same time, at each clinic. A simple linear regression was then run, comparing changes in patient volume and percent Medicaid. ResultsTwo clinics had similar payer mixes, and saw similar decreases in utilization. A third clinic with twice as many Medicaid patients, saw only half the reduction in patient volume, during the nadir in April 2020. ConclusionGiven the limited number of data points, a more robust statistical analysis was not possible. A simple regression line indicated a correlation between the proportion of Medicaid patients and demand resilience for healthcare resources. At scale, the Medicaid population may be less vulnerable to variations in utilization, exhibiting less elastic demand, despite a pandemic, for a myriad of reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Internal Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Internal Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-571738/V1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Internal Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-571738/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effects of Payer-Mix on Utilization during the COVID-19 Pandemic, in Urgent and Primary Care.
BackgroundHealthcare utilization has changed dramatically during the COVID-19 crisis with the most dramatic drops coming in April 2020. While a lot of research has focused on utilization among the privately insured, or on comparing specialty-visits, comparatively less has been published on the effect of payer-mix, particularly Medicaid, on utilization. MethodsMonthly patient volume was gathered across 3 ambulatory primary and urgent care clinics. The timeframe included appointments, walk-ins and virtual visits from January through June 2020, including the nadir in April. Patient volume was then compared to average payer mix over that same time, at each clinic. A simple linear regression was then run, comparing changes in patient volume and percent Medicaid. ResultsTwo clinics had similar payer mixes, and saw similar decreases in utilization. A third clinic with twice as many Medicaid patients, saw only half the reduction in patient volume, during the nadir in April 2020. ConclusionGiven the limited number of data points, a more robust statistical analysis was not possible. A simple regression line indicated a correlation between the proportion of Medicaid patients and demand resilience for healthcare resources. At scale, the Medicaid population may be less vulnerable to variations in utilization, exhibiting less elastic demand, despite a pandemic, for a myriad of reasons.