COVID-19大流行期间支付者组合对急诊和初级保健利用的影响

Luis W Dominguez, Brandon Beattie, Alexander Poulose
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间支付者组合对急诊和初级保健利用的影响","authors":"Luis W Dominguez, Brandon Beattie, Alexander Poulose","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-571738/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n BackgroundHealthcare utilization has changed dramatically during the COVID-19 crisis with the most dramatic drops coming in April 2020. While a lot of research has focused on utilization among the privately insured, or on comparing specialty-visits, comparatively less has been published on the effect of payer-mix, particularly Medicaid, on utilization. MethodsMonthly patient volume was gathered across 3 ambulatory primary and urgent care clinics. The timeframe included appointments, walk-ins and virtual visits from January through June 2020, including the nadir in April. Patient volume was then compared to average payer mix over that same time, at each clinic. A simple linear regression was then run, comparing changes in patient volume and percent Medicaid. ResultsTwo clinics had similar payer mixes, and saw similar decreases in utilization. A third clinic with twice as many Medicaid patients, saw only half the reduction in patient volume, during the nadir in April 2020. ConclusionGiven the limited number of data points, a more robust statistical analysis was not possible. A simple regression line indicated a correlation between the proportion of Medicaid patients and demand resilience for healthcare resources. At scale, the Medicaid population may be less vulnerable to variations in utilization, exhibiting less elastic demand, despite a pandemic, for a myriad of reasons.","PeriodicalId":8282,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Internal Medicine Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Payer-Mix on Utilization during the COVID-19 Pandemic, in Urgent and Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Luis W Dominguez, Brandon Beattie, Alexander Poulose\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/RS.3.RS-571738/V1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n BackgroundHealthcare utilization has changed dramatically during the COVID-19 crisis with the most dramatic drops coming in April 2020. While a lot of research has focused on utilization among the privately insured, or on comparing specialty-visits, comparatively less has been published on the effect of payer-mix, particularly Medicaid, on utilization. MethodsMonthly patient volume was gathered across 3 ambulatory primary and urgent care clinics. The timeframe included appointments, walk-ins and virtual visits from January through June 2020, including the nadir in April. Patient volume was then compared to average payer mix over that same time, at each clinic. A simple linear regression was then run, comparing changes in patient volume and percent Medicaid. ResultsTwo clinics had similar payer mixes, and saw similar decreases in utilization. A third clinic with twice as many Medicaid patients, saw only half the reduction in patient volume, during the nadir in April 2020. ConclusionGiven the limited number of data points, a more robust statistical analysis was not possible. A simple regression line indicated a correlation between the proportion of Medicaid patients and demand resilience for healthcare resources. At scale, the Medicaid population may be less vulnerable to variations in utilization, exhibiting less elastic demand, despite a pandemic, for a myriad of reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Internal Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Internal Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-571738/V1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Internal Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-571738/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病危机期间,医疗保健利用发生了巨大变化,2020年4月降幅最大。虽然许多研究都集中在私人保险的利用上,或者比较专科就诊,但相对而言,关于付款人组合,特别是医疗补助对利用的影响的研究较少。方法收集3个门诊初级和急诊诊所每月的患者数量。时间范围包括2020年1月至6月的预约、预约和虚拟访问,包括4月的最低点。然后将每个诊所的患者数量与同一时间的平均付款人组合进行比较。然后进行简单的线性回归,比较患者数量和医疗补助百分比的变化。结果两家诊所的付款人组合相似,使用率也有相似的下降。第三家诊所的医疗补助病人数量是原来的两倍,但在2020年4月的最低点,病人数量只减少了一半。结论由于数据点数量有限,不可能进行更可靠的统计分析。一条简单的回归线显示了医疗补助患者比例与医疗资源需求弹性之间的相关性。从规模上看,医疗补助人群可能不太容易受到利用变化的影响,尽管发生了大流行,但由于种种原因,他们的需求弹性较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Payer-Mix on Utilization during the COVID-19 Pandemic, in Urgent and Primary Care.
BackgroundHealthcare utilization has changed dramatically during the COVID-19 crisis with the most dramatic drops coming in April 2020. While a lot of research has focused on utilization among the privately insured, or on comparing specialty-visits, comparatively less has been published on the effect of payer-mix, particularly Medicaid, on utilization. MethodsMonthly patient volume was gathered across 3 ambulatory primary and urgent care clinics. The timeframe included appointments, walk-ins and virtual visits from January through June 2020, including the nadir in April. Patient volume was then compared to average payer mix over that same time, at each clinic. A simple linear regression was then run, comparing changes in patient volume and percent Medicaid. ResultsTwo clinics had similar payer mixes, and saw similar decreases in utilization. A third clinic with twice as many Medicaid patients, saw only half the reduction in patient volume, during the nadir in April 2020. ConclusionGiven the limited number of data points, a more robust statistical analysis was not possible. A simple regression line indicated a correlation between the proportion of Medicaid patients and demand resilience for healthcare resources. At scale, the Medicaid population may be less vulnerable to variations in utilization, exhibiting less elastic demand, despite a pandemic, for a myriad of reasons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early vs Delayed Feeding after Endoscopic Esophageal Variceal Ligation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Effect of Andrographis paniculata Treatment for Nonimmune Patients with Early-Stage COVID-19 on the Prevention of Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study A New Anthropometric Model for Body Composition Estimation in the Assessment of Metabolic Risk Factors of Obese Women Demographic and Clinical Profile Analysis of Covid-19 Suspected Patients: A Tertiary Care Hospital Study in Bangladesh Cellular Uptake and Localization of Hematoporphyrin Derivatives in Lung Adenocarcinoma A549, Squamous Carcinoma H520 and Small Cell Carcinoma H446 Cell Lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1