化学混凝与电浮选协同处理合成棕榈油厂废水的效果

E. Fobang, Takeshi Fujino, T.A.O.K. Meetiyagoda
{"title":"化学混凝与电浮选协同处理合成棕榈油厂废水的效果","authors":"E. Fobang, Takeshi Fujino, T.A.O.K. Meetiyagoda","doi":"10.3390/suschem4020010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Palm oil mill effluent (POME) is considered the most environmentally harmful when discharged without proper treatment. In addition to conventional biological treatment methods, physicochemical treatment techniques are considered alternative methods to treat POME as polishing or post-treatment techniques to meet the discharge water quality standards set by authorities. Recently, electroflotation (EF) has gained popularity in wastewater treatment owing to its high efficiency, no harmful by-products, and ease of operation. However, EF has limitations on energy consumption because high current density and long electrolysis time are often used to increase the density of gas bubbles and metallic ions produced in the EF system used in pollutant removal. Polyaluminum chloride (PAC) and cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) are used as alternative options for the production of coagulants instead of using a sacrificial anode in EF. In this study, we hypothesized that PAC and CPAM could enhance the efficiency and reduce the specific energy consumption of EF by minimizing the electrolysis time used in POME treatment. The effects of electrolysis time, current density, and coagulant dosage on POME treatment were investigated. EF treatment at a current density of 2.5 mA/cm2 has achieved 82% of turbidity and 47% of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal after 45 min electrolysis time, consuming 0.014 kWh of specific energy for the treatment of one gram of COD. There was no improvement in terms of turbidity removal when the current density was increased from 2.5 to 5 mA/cm2; however, the COD removal efficiency was increased up to 52% at 5 mA/cm2. When EF was performed at 1 A combined with PAC at a dosage of 40 mg/L and CPAM at a dosage of 20 mg/L, it was noticed that turbidity and COD removal increased up to 96% and 54%, respectively, within 15 min electrolysis. Subsequently, the specific energy consumption was reduced to 0.004 kWh (by 71%) per one gram of COD treatment. Results confirmed that the chemical coagulants could increase the POME treatment efficiency and reduce the specific energy consumption of EF. However, this method can be improved aiming at further reduction of COD by mineralizing the dissolved organic compounds to fulfill the POME discharge quality standards.","PeriodicalId":22103,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergetic Effect of Chemical Coagulation and Electroflotation on Synthetic Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment\",\"authors\":\"E. Fobang, Takeshi Fujino, T.A.O.K. Meetiyagoda\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/suschem4020010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Palm oil mill effluent (POME) is considered the most environmentally harmful when discharged without proper treatment. In addition to conventional biological treatment methods, physicochemical treatment techniques are considered alternative methods to treat POME as polishing or post-treatment techniques to meet the discharge water quality standards set by authorities. Recently, electroflotation (EF) has gained popularity in wastewater treatment owing to its high efficiency, no harmful by-products, and ease of operation. However, EF has limitations on energy consumption because high current density and long electrolysis time are often used to increase the density of gas bubbles and metallic ions produced in the EF system used in pollutant removal. Polyaluminum chloride (PAC) and cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) are used as alternative options for the production of coagulants instead of using a sacrificial anode in EF. In this study, we hypothesized that PAC and CPAM could enhance the efficiency and reduce the specific energy consumption of EF by minimizing the electrolysis time used in POME treatment. The effects of electrolysis time, current density, and coagulant dosage on POME treatment were investigated. EF treatment at a current density of 2.5 mA/cm2 has achieved 82% of turbidity and 47% of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal after 45 min electrolysis time, consuming 0.014 kWh of specific energy for the treatment of one gram of COD. There was no improvement in terms of turbidity removal when the current density was increased from 2.5 to 5 mA/cm2; however, the COD removal efficiency was increased up to 52% at 5 mA/cm2. When EF was performed at 1 A combined with PAC at a dosage of 40 mg/L and CPAM at a dosage of 20 mg/L, it was noticed that turbidity and COD removal increased up to 96% and 54%, respectively, within 15 min electrolysis. Subsequently, the specific energy consumption was reduced to 0.004 kWh (by 71%) per one gram of COD treatment. Results confirmed that the chemical coagulants could increase the POME treatment efficiency and reduce the specific energy consumption of EF. However, this method can be improved aiming at further reduction of COD by mineralizing the dissolved organic compounds to fulfill the POME discharge quality standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem4020010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem4020010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

棕榈油厂废水(POME)被认为是最有害的环境,如果排放未经适当处理。除了传统的生物处理方法外,物理化学处理技术被认为是将POME作为抛光或后处理技术的替代方法,以满足当局制定的排放水质标准。近年来,电浮选法以其高效、无有害副产物、易操作等优点在污水处理中得到广泛应用。然而,电解法在能量消耗上有限制,因为在电解法去除污染物时,经常使用高电流密度和长电解时间来增加电解法系统产生的气泡和金属离子的密度。聚合氯化铝(PAC)和阳离子聚丙烯酰胺(CPAM)被用作生产混凝剂的替代选择,而不是在EF中使用牺牲阳极。在本研究中,我们假设PAC和CPAM可以通过最小化POME处理中使用的电解时间来提高效率并降低EF的比能耗。考察了电解时间、电流密度和混凝剂用量对POME处理效果的影响。电解45 min后,电流密度为2.5 mA/cm2的电解处理达到82%的浊度和47%的化学需氧量(COD)去除率,处理1克COD消耗0.014 kWh的比能。当电流密度从2.5 mA/cm2增加到5 mA/cm2时,除浊效果没有改善;在5 mA/cm2时,COD去除率可达52%。当电解时间为1 A时,电解时PAC用量为40 mg/L, CPAM用量为20 mg/L,在电解15 min内,浊度和COD去除率分别提高了96%和54%。随后,每克COD处理的比能耗降至0.004 kWh(71%)。结果表明,化学混凝剂可以提高POME的处理效率,降低EF的比能耗。但是,该方法可以通过矿化溶解的有机物来进一步降低COD,以达到POME排放的质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synergetic Effect of Chemical Coagulation and Electroflotation on Synthetic Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment
Palm oil mill effluent (POME) is considered the most environmentally harmful when discharged without proper treatment. In addition to conventional biological treatment methods, physicochemical treatment techniques are considered alternative methods to treat POME as polishing or post-treatment techniques to meet the discharge water quality standards set by authorities. Recently, electroflotation (EF) has gained popularity in wastewater treatment owing to its high efficiency, no harmful by-products, and ease of operation. However, EF has limitations on energy consumption because high current density and long electrolysis time are often used to increase the density of gas bubbles and metallic ions produced in the EF system used in pollutant removal. Polyaluminum chloride (PAC) and cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) are used as alternative options for the production of coagulants instead of using a sacrificial anode in EF. In this study, we hypothesized that PAC and CPAM could enhance the efficiency and reduce the specific energy consumption of EF by minimizing the electrolysis time used in POME treatment. The effects of electrolysis time, current density, and coagulant dosage on POME treatment were investigated. EF treatment at a current density of 2.5 mA/cm2 has achieved 82% of turbidity and 47% of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal after 45 min electrolysis time, consuming 0.014 kWh of specific energy for the treatment of one gram of COD. There was no improvement in terms of turbidity removal when the current density was increased from 2.5 to 5 mA/cm2; however, the COD removal efficiency was increased up to 52% at 5 mA/cm2. When EF was performed at 1 A combined with PAC at a dosage of 40 mg/L and CPAM at a dosage of 20 mg/L, it was noticed that turbidity and COD removal increased up to 96% and 54%, respectively, within 15 min electrolysis. Subsequently, the specific energy consumption was reduced to 0.004 kWh (by 71%) per one gram of COD treatment. Results confirmed that the chemical coagulants could increase the POME treatment efficiency and reduce the specific energy consumption of EF. However, this method can be improved aiming at further reduction of COD by mineralizing the dissolved organic compounds to fulfill the POME discharge quality standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aqueous Solution of Ionic Liquid Is an Efficient Substituting Solvent System for the Extraction of Alginate from Sargassum tenerrimum The Multifaceted Perspective on the Role of Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles in Promoting a Sustainable Green Economy Recent Progress in Turning Waste into Catalysts for Green Syntheses A Perspective on Solar-Driven Electrochemical Routes for Sustainable Methanol Production Waste Lignocellulosic Biomass as a Source for Bioethanol Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1