{"title":"使用比较判断的同行评议简短答案","authors":"P. Kolhe, M. Littman, C. Isbell","doi":"10.1145/2876034.2893424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a comparative judgement scheme for grading short answer questions in an online class. The scheme works by asking students to answer short answer questions. Then a multiple choice question is created whose choices are the answers given by students. We show that we can formulate a probabilistic graphical model for this scheme which lets us infer each students proficiency for answering and grading questions.","PeriodicalId":20739,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer Reviewing Short Answers using Comparative Judgement\",\"authors\":\"P. Kolhe, M. Littman, C. Isbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2876034.2893424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a comparative judgement scheme for grading short answer questions in an online class. The scheme works by asking students to answer short answer questions. Then a multiple choice question is created whose choices are the answers given by students. We show that we can formulate a probabilistic graphical model for this scheme which lets us infer each students proficiency for answering and grading questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2893424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2893424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peer Reviewing Short Answers using Comparative Judgement
We propose a comparative judgement scheme for grading short answer questions in an online class. The scheme works by asking students to answer short answer questions. Then a multiple choice question is created whose choices are the answers given by students. We show that we can formulate a probabilistic graphical model for this scheme which lets us infer each students proficiency for answering and grading questions.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
