消费者对鸡蛋中多重和多余标签的反应

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Food Distribution Research Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI:10.22004/AG.ECON.240708
Yan Heng, H. Peterson, Xianghong Li
{"title":"消费者对鸡蛋中多重和多余标签的反应","authors":"Yan Heng, H. Peterson, Xianghong Li","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.240708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food labels convey various information about credence attributes. An increasing number of labels and the existence of superfluous labels lead to questions on how consumers value different number of co-presented labels. Average respondents to our national survey about eggs were willing to pay a premium for all considered attribute labels, but their valuations depended on how many other labels were presented simultaneously. For example, certified organic label lost value as it was presented with more labels. On average, respondents also valued labels that conveyed no additional information, even after being presented with their superfluity.","PeriodicalId":36788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Distribution Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"62-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer Responses to Multiple and Superfluous Labels in the Case of Eggs\",\"authors\":\"Yan Heng, H. Peterson, Xianghong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.240708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Food labels convey various information about credence attributes. An increasing number of labels and the existence of superfluous labels lead to questions on how consumers value different number of co-presented labels. Average respondents to our national survey about eggs were willing to pay a premium for all considered attribute labels, but their valuations depended on how many other labels were presented simultaneously. For example, certified organic label lost value as it was presented with more labels. On average, respondents also valued labels that conveyed no additional information, even after being presented with their superfluity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Distribution Research\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"62-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Distribution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.240708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Distribution Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.240708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

食品标签传达了关于信任属性的各种信息。标签数量的增加和多余标签的存在导致消费者如何评价不同数量的共同呈现标签的问题。我们对鸡蛋进行的全国调查的平均受访者愿意为所有考虑的属性标签支付溢价,但他们的估值取决于同时呈现的其他标签的数量。例如,有机认证标签随着标签的增多而失去了价值。平均而言,受访者也重视那些没有传达额外信息的标签,即使是在展示了这些多余信息之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumer Responses to Multiple and Superfluous Labels in the Case of Eggs
Food labels convey various information about credence attributes. An increasing number of labels and the existence of superfluous labels lead to questions on how consumers value different number of co-presented labels. Average respondents to our national survey about eggs were willing to pay a premium for all considered attribute labels, but their valuations depended on how many other labels were presented simultaneously. For example, certified organic label lost value as it was presented with more labels. On average, respondents also valued labels that conveyed no additional information, even after being presented with their superfluity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Distribution Research
Journal of Food Distribution Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Adoption of Drying Added-Value Technologies in the Specialty Crop Industry The Consumer Choice of Market for Fresh Fruits: A Study of Attitudinal Factors and Market Attributes Consumer Preferences for Direct-to-Consumer Value-Added Agriculture in North Carolina: Preliminary Findings of Consumer Focus Groups Outreach Efforts at Standardizing Farm to Institution Reporting Metrics Factors Influencing Fruit and Vegetable Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Market Outlets with a Food Justice Mission: The Case of Fresh Stop Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1