吸入器治疗患者的最大吸气流量指数低

W. I. G. Matute, Margarita Hernandez Yañez, Rosa Maria Rojas Moreno-Tomé, María Gallardo Bermejo, M. Rubio, L. P. Maestú
{"title":"吸入器治疗患者的最大吸气流量指数低","authors":"W. I. G. Matute, Margarita Hernandez Yañez, Rosa Maria Rojas Moreno-Tomé, María Gallardo Bermejo, M. Rubio, L. P. Maestú","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objective: Low peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) can cause suboptimal inhaler usage, leading to ineffective bronchodilation.1 This study aim was to determine the frequency of PIFR with a manual inspiratory flow meter in patients using inhaler devices. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study including adult patients assisting lung function laboratory on their routine follow-up of their chronic respiratory disease using inhaled medication. In-Check DIAL G16® device was used to simulate the resistance of the inhaler and determine the patient’s PIFR. Results: Total number was 155 patients, mean age of 63±15.2 years, 58.1% women. 64 (41.3%) patients used inhalers with an optimal PIFR greater than 60 L/ minute. The specific values of each one are observed in table 1, finding statistically significant differences by both group comparisons (p Conclusions: Low PIFR was frequently determined in patients using various inhalers devices, and consequently, not reaching its optimal value for adequate treatment. 1Kawamatawong T., et. al. Peak inspiratory flow rate measurements by using In-Check Dial for the different inhaler devices in elderly with obstructive airway diseases. Journal of Asthma and Allergy 2017: 10; 17-21.","PeriodicalId":76252,"journal":{"name":"Nurses Lamp","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low maximum inspiratory flow index in patients with inhaler therapy\",\"authors\":\"W. I. G. Matute, Margarita Hernandez Yañez, Rosa Maria Rojas Moreno-Tomé, María Gallardo Bermejo, M. Rubio, L. P. Maestú\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and Objective: Low peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) can cause suboptimal inhaler usage, leading to ineffective bronchodilation.1 This study aim was to determine the frequency of PIFR with a manual inspiratory flow meter in patients using inhaler devices. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study including adult patients assisting lung function laboratory on their routine follow-up of their chronic respiratory disease using inhaled medication. In-Check DIAL G16® device was used to simulate the resistance of the inhaler and determine the patient’s PIFR. Results: Total number was 155 patients, mean age of 63±15.2 years, 58.1% women. 64 (41.3%) patients used inhalers with an optimal PIFR greater than 60 L/ minute. The specific values of each one are observed in table 1, finding statistically significant differences by both group comparisons (p Conclusions: Low PIFR was frequently determined in patients using various inhalers devices, and consequently, not reaching its optimal value for adequate treatment. 1Kawamatawong T., et. al. Peak inspiratory flow rate measurements by using In-Check Dial for the different inhaler devices in elderly with obstructive airway diseases. Journal of Asthma and Allergy 2017: 10; 17-21.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurses Lamp\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurses Lamp\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurses Lamp","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介与目的:低峰值吸气流量(PIFR)可导致吸入器使用不理想,导致支气管扩张无效本研究的目的是在使用吸入器装置的患者中,用手动吸气流量计确定PIFR的频率。方法:一项描述性横断面研究,包括成年患者协助肺功能实验室使用吸入药物对其慢性呼吸系统疾病进行常规随访。使用In-Check DIAL G16®装置模拟吸入器的阻力并确定患者的PIFR。结果:患者总数155例,平均年龄63±15.2岁,女性占58.1%。64例(41.3%)患者使用最佳PIFR大于60 L/分钟的吸入器。表1中观察了每一项的具体值,发现两组比较具有统计学意义(p)。结论:使用各种吸入器装置的患者经常检测到低PIFR,因此,没有达到适当治疗的最佳值。1Kawamatawong,等。使用in - check Dial测量不同吸入器对老年阻塞性气道疾病患者的峰值吸入流量。哮喘与过敏杂志2017:10;17-21。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low maximum inspiratory flow index in patients with inhaler therapy
Introduction and Objective: Low peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) can cause suboptimal inhaler usage, leading to ineffective bronchodilation.1 This study aim was to determine the frequency of PIFR with a manual inspiratory flow meter in patients using inhaler devices. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study including adult patients assisting lung function laboratory on their routine follow-up of their chronic respiratory disease using inhaled medication. In-Check DIAL G16® device was used to simulate the resistance of the inhaler and determine the patient’s PIFR. Results: Total number was 155 patients, mean age of 63±15.2 years, 58.1% women. 64 (41.3%) patients used inhalers with an optimal PIFR greater than 60 L/ minute. The specific values of each one are observed in table 1, finding statistically significant differences by both group comparisons (p Conclusions: Low PIFR was frequently determined in patients using various inhalers devices, and consequently, not reaching its optimal value for adequate treatment. 1Kawamatawong T., et. al. Peak inspiratory flow rate measurements by using In-Check Dial for the different inhaler devices in elderly with obstructive airway diseases. Journal of Asthma and Allergy 2017: 10; 17-21.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking COPD Exacerbations: a global patient perspective Is an informative application a suitable tool for patients in a diagnostic lung cancer program?A qualitative study Use of Clinical Nurse Specialists in the Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Health-psychologic features and health-related quality of life in persons with severe asthma The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Portuguese rehabilitation nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1