作为扩大参与干预措施的一部分,在线交付是否会影响项目的参与和结果?

Lauren Bellaera, Lottie Norton, Hannah Thomson
{"title":"作为扩大参与干预措施的一部分,在线交付是否会影响项目的参与和结果?","authors":"Lauren Bellaera, Lottie Norton, Hannah Thomson","doi":"10.5456/wpll.24.2.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether programme engagement and outcomes differ based on the mode of delivery (in person versus online) for a UK-based Widening Participation (WP) programme during the Covid-19 pandemic. In total, 2507 school students attended academic in-person tutorials, and 2505\n attended academic tutorials online. The findings show that tutorial attendance did not significantly differ based on the mode of delivery. We also see similar programme outcomes for both in-person and online programmes. However, the completion of the 'baseline assignment' , which was the first\n piece of work undertaken by students on the programme, was negatively impacted by the online setting (i. e., lower submission rates). This suggests that further considerations are needed to engage students with activities that happen early in the online programme. As part of the study, we\n also collected feedback from programme staff about their reflections of running a WP programme virtually. Based on these insights, we make suggestions for how WP can best utilise digital forms of delivery in the future.","PeriodicalId":90763,"journal":{"name":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does online delivery impact programme engagement and outcomes as part of a Widening Participation intervention?\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Bellaera, Lottie Norton, Hannah Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.5456/wpll.24.2.171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines whether programme engagement and outcomes differ based on the mode of delivery (in person versus online) for a UK-based Widening Participation (WP) programme during the Covid-19 pandemic. In total, 2507 school students attended academic in-person tutorials, and 2505\\n attended academic tutorials online. The findings show that tutorial attendance did not significantly differ based on the mode of delivery. We also see similar programme outcomes for both in-person and online programmes. However, the completion of the 'baseline assignment' , which was the first\\n piece of work undertaken by students on the programme, was negatively impacted by the online setting (i. e., lower submission rates). This suggests that further considerations are needed to engage students with activities that happen early in the online programme. As part of the study, we\\n also collected feedback from programme staff about their reflections of running a WP programme virtually. Based on these insights, we make suggestions for how WP can best utilise digital forms of delivery in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.24.2.171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.24.2.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间英国扩大参与(WP)计划的参与程度和结果是否会因交付模式(面对面与在线)而有所不同。总共有2507名学生参加了面对面的学术辅导,2505名学生参加了网上的学术辅导。研究结果表明,辅导出勤率并没有显著差异基于交付模式。我们还发现,面对面课程和在线课程的课程效果相似。然而,完成“基线作业”,这是学生在课程中承担的第一项工作,受到在线设置的负面影响(即较低的提交率)。这表明,需要进一步考虑让学生参与在线课程早期的活动。作为研究的一部分,我们还收集了项目工作人员对虚拟WP项目的反馈。基于这些见解,我们对WP如何在未来最好地利用数字交付形式提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does online delivery impact programme engagement and outcomes as part of a Widening Participation intervention?
This study examines whether programme engagement and outcomes differ based on the mode of delivery (in person versus online) for a UK-based Widening Participation (WP) programme during the Covid-19 pandemic. In total, 2507 school students attended academic in-person tutorials, and 2505 attended academic tutorials online. The findings show that tutorial attendance did not significantly differ based on the mode of delivery. We also see similar programme outcomes for both in-person and online programmes. However, the completion of the 'baseline assignment' , which was the first piece of work undertaken by students on the programme, was negatively impacted by the online setting (i. e., lower submission rates). This suggests that further considerations are needed to engage students with activities that happen early in the online programme. As part of the study, we also collected feedback from programme staff about their reflections of running a WP programme virtually. Based on these insights, we make suggestions for how WP can best utilise digital forms of delivery in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher education policies for applicants with criminal records in the United Kingdom: Are universities ‘banning the box’? Scientist encounters: Igniting parental aspirations to support young scientists ‐ a pilot study Editorial – general edition A typology of social equity discourses and its contribution to a wicked problem Can role models help encourage young people to apply to (selective) universities? Evidence from a large-scale English field experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1