M. Barish, L. Weng, Dina Awabdeh, Blake Brewster, M. D’Apuzzo, Yubo Zhai, Alfonso Brito, B. Chang, Annie Sarkissian, R. Starr, W. Chang, B. Aguilar, A. Naranjo, S. Blanchard, Russell C. Rockne, B. Badie, Vanessa Jonsson, Stephen J. Forman, Christine Brown
{"title":"胶质母细胞瘤中异质抗原表达的高分辨率图谱及其免疫治疗的意义","authors":"M. Barish, L. Weng, Dina Awabdeh, Blake Brewster, M. D’Apuzzo, Yubo Zhai, Alfonso Brito, B. Chang, Annie Sarkissian, R. Starr, W. Chang, B. Aguilar, A. Naranjo, S. Blanchard, Russell C. Rockne, B. Badie, Vanessa Jonsson, Stephen J. Forman, Christine Brown","doi":"10.1136/LBA2019.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Glioblastoma (GBM) remains an almost universally fatal brain tumor. While CAR T cell immunotherapy has shown promising clinical efficacy, therapeutic failure may reflect our incomplete understanding of target antigen expression. We previously examined variations in antigen expression at the level of individual patients (inter-patient or inter-tumor heterogeneity), focusing on immunotherapy targets IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR. We concluded that antigen expression diverged from expectations from random expression. Because antigen escape may arise from GBM cell heterogeneity, we have mapped target antigen expression within individual tumors (intra-tumor heterogeneity). Methods Serial sections from a 43 patient cohort were immunostained (DAB with hematoxylin counterstain) for target antigens IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR. Each section was annotated directly from the slide by a neuropathologist. Sections were scanned (0.46 µm/pixel; Hamamatsu), and then working within Fiji/ImageJ, images were segmented by color deconvolution into hematoxylin (nuclei) and DAB layers. Images of nuclear layers were aligned, and used to align the DAB layers. Two schemes were used to examine the spatial distributions of the three target antigens. When tumor domains could be identified, we determined expression of each antigen as optical density (OD). In the second scheme, a 10 µm grid was superimposed on each section, and OD was determined for each position and assembled into spreadsheets (Origin v2019b). Maps for expression were generated from the OD in each position. Results Approaching these maps from the perspective of antigen escape, we examined the extent to which expression of target antigens was spatially mixed, how rapidly antigen dominance could shift (spatial frequency), and whether spatial distributions were arrayed in a coordinated manner. When tumor domains could be identified, we calculated the Shannon diversity index (H) for each domain within a section. While values of H clustered within some tumors, usually values of H varied widely. The superimposed grid was used to examine heterogeneity within entire tumor sections. Expression was intermixed, and EGFR and IL13Rα2/HER2 displayeds complementary expression patterns. In tumors with large EGFR+ areas, IL13Rα2+/HER2+ areas could overlap, while when EGFR+ areas were smaller, IL13Rα2+ and HER2+ areas were more distinct. Borders could be quite diffuse, or quite sharp (a few cell diameters). Conclusions Our results indicate that expression of IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR is highly heterogeneous and not always spatially distinct. Because GBM tumors adapt to the selection pressures of immunotherapies, we suggest that combination therapies should be designed accordingly, and immunotherapies targeting IL13Rα2/HER2 could benefit from inclusion of EGFR.","PeriodicalId":16067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer","volume":"19 1","pages":"A6 - A6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P855 High-resolution maps of heterogeneous antigen expression in glioblastoma and implications for immunotherapy\",\"authors\":\"M. Barish, L. Weng, Dina Awabdeh, Blake Brewster, M. D’Apuzzo, Yubo Zhai, Alfonso Brito, B. Chang, Annie Sarkissian, R. Starr, W. Chang, B. Aguilar, A. Naranjo, S. Blanchard, Russell C. Rockne, B. Badie, Vanessa Jonsson, Stephen J. Forman, Christine Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/LBA2019.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Glioblastoma (GBM) remains an almost universally fatal brain tumor. While CAR T cell immunotherapy has shown promising clinical efficacy, therapeutic failure may reflect our incomplete understanding of target antigen expression. We previously examined variations in antigen expression at the level of individual patients (inter-patient or inter-tumor heterogeneity), focusing on immunotherapy targets IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR. We concluded that antigen expression diverged from expectations from random expression. Because antigen escape may arise from GBM cell heterogeneity, we have mapped target antigen expression within individual tumors (intra-tumor heterogeneity). Methods Serial sections from a 43 patient cohort were immunostained (DAB with hematoxylin counterstain) for target antigens IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR. Each section was annotated directly from the slide by a neuropathologist. Sections were scanned (0.46 µm/pixel; Hamamatsu), and then working within Fiji/ImageJ, images were segmented by color deconvolution into hematoxylin (nuclei) and DAB layers. Images of nuclear layers were aligned, and used to align the DAB layers. Two schemes were used to examine the spatial distributions of the three target antigens. When tumor domains could be identified, we determined expression of each antigen as optical density (OD). In the second scheme, a 10 µm grid was superimposed on each section, and OD was determined for each position and assembled into spreadsheets (Origin v2019b). Maps for expression were generated from the OD in each position. Results Approaching these maps from the perspective of antigen escape, we examined the extent to which expression of target antigens was spatially mixed, how rapidly antigen dominance could shift (spatial frequency), and whether spatial distributions were arrayed in a coordinated manner. When tumor domains could be identified, we calculated the Shannon diversity index (H) for each domain within a section. While values of H clustered within some tumors, usually values of H varied widely. The superimposed grid was used to examine heterogeneity within entire tumor sections. Expression was intermixed, and EGFR and IL13Rα2/HER2 displayeds complementary expression patterns. In tumors with large EGFR+ areas, IL13Rα2+/HER2+ areas could overlap, while when EGFR+ areas were smaller, IL13Rα2+ and HER2+ areas were more distinct. Borders could be quite diffuse, or quite sharp (a few cell diameters). Conclusions Our results indicate that expression of IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR is highly heterogeneous and not always spatially distinct. Because GBM tumors adapt to the selection pressures of immunotherapies, we suggest that combination therapies should be designed accordingly, and immunotherapies targeting IL13Rα2/HER2 could benefit from inclusion of EGFR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"A6 - A6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/LBA2019.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/LBA2019.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
P855 High-resolution maps of heterogeneous antigen expression in glioblastoma and implications for immunotherapy
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) remains an almost universally fatal brain tumor. While CAR T cell immunotherapy has shown promising clinical efficacy, therapeutic failure may reflect our incomplete understanding of target antigen expression. We previously examined variations in antigen expression at the level of individual patients (inter-patient or inter-tumor heterogeneity), focusing on immunotherapy targets IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR. We concluded that antigen expression diverged from expectations from random expression. Because antigen escape may arise from GBM cell heterogeneity, we have mapped target antigen expression within individual tumors (intra-tumor heterogeneity). Methods Serial sections from a 43 patient cohort were immunostained (DAB with hematoxylin counterstain) for target antigens IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR. Each section was annotated directly from the slide by a neuropathologist. Sections were scanned (0.46 µm/pixel; Hamamatsu), and then working within Fiji/ImageJ, images were segmented by color deconvolution into hematoxylin (nuclei) and DAB layers. Images of nuclear layers were aligned, and used to align the DAB layers. Two schemes were used to examine the spatial distributions of the three target antigens. When tumor domains could be identified, we determined expression of each antigen as optical density (OD). In the second scheme, a 10 µm grid was superimposed on each section, and OD was determined for each position and assembled into spreadsheets (Origin v2019b). Maps for expression were generated from the OD in each position. Results Approaching these maps from the perspective of antigen escape, we examined the extent to which expression of target antigens was spatially mixed, how rapidly antigen dominance could shift (spatial frequency), and whether spatial distributions were arrayed in a coordinated manner. When tumor domains could be identified, we calculated the Shannon diversity index (H) for each domain within a section. While values of H clustered within some tumors, usually values of H varied widely. The superimposed grid was used to examine heterogeneity within entire tumor sections. Expression was intermixed, and EGFR and IL13Rα2/HER2 displayeds complementary expression patterns. In tumors with large EGFR+ areas, IL13Rα2+/HER2+ areas could overlap, while when EGFR+ areas were smaller, IL13Rα2+ and HER2+ areas were more distinct. Borders could be quite diffuse, or quite sharp (a few cell diameters). Conclusions Our results indicate that expression of IL13Rα2, HER2 and EGFR is highly heterogeneous and not always spatially distinct. Because GBM tumors adapt to the selection pressures of immunotherapies, we suggest that combination therapies should be designed accordingly, and immunotherapies targeting IL13Rα2/HER2 could benefit from inclusion of EGFR.