确定和标记空间音频重放的偏好维度

J. Francombe, Tim S. Brookes, R. Mason, James Woodcock
{"title":"确定和标记空间音频重放的偏好维度","authors":"J. Francombe, Tim S. Brookes, R. Mason, James Woodcock","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are currently many spatial audio reproduction systems in domestic use (e.g. mono, stereo, surround sound, sound bars, and headphones). In an experiment, pairwise preference magnitude ratings for a range of such systems were collected from trained and untrained listeners. The ratings were analysed using internal preference mapping to: (i) uncover the principal perceptual dimensions of listener preference; (ii) label the dimensions based on important perceptual attributes; and (iii) observe differences between trained and untrained listeners. To aid with labelling the dimensions, perceptual attributes were elicited alongside the preference ratings and were analysed by: (i) considering a metric derived from the frequency of use of each attribute and the magnitude of the related preference judgements; and (ii) observing attribute use for comparisons between specific methods. The first preference dimension accounted for over 90% of the variance in ratings; all participants exhibited a preference for reproduction methods that were positively correlated with the first dimension (most notably 5-, 9-, and 22-channel surround sound). This dimension was related to multiple important attributes, including those associated with spatial capability and absence of distortions. The second dimension accounted for only a very small proportion of the variance, and appeared to separate the headphone method from the other methods. The trained and untrained listeners generally showed opposite preferences in the second dimension, suggesting that trained listeners have a higher preference for headphone reproduction than untrained listeners.","PeriodicalId":6645,"journal":{"name":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"74 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining and labeling the preference dimensions of spatial audio replay\",\"authors\":\"J. Francombe, Tim S. Brookes, R. Mason, James Woodcock\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are currently many spatial audio reproduction systems in domestic use (e.g. mono, stereo, surround sound, sound bars, and headphones). In an experiment, pairwise preference magnitude ratings for a range of such systems were collected from trained and untrained listeners. The ratings were analysed using internal preference mapping to: (i) uncover the principal perceptual dimensions of listener preference; (ii) label the dimensions based on important perceptual attributes; and (iii) observe differences between trained and untrained listeners. To aid with labelling the dimensions, perceptual attributes were elicited alongside the preference ratings and were analysed by: (i) considering a metric derived from the frequency of use of each attribute and the magnitude of the related preference judgements; and (ii) observing attribute use for comparisons between specific methods. The first preference dimension accounted for over 90% of the variance in ratings; all participants exhibited a preference for reproduction methods that were positively correlated with the first dimension (most notably 5-, 9-, and 22-channel surround sound). This dimension was related to multiple important attributes, including those associated with spatial capability and absence of distortions. The second dimension accounted for only a very small proportion of the variance, and appeared to separate the headphone method from the other methods. The trained and untrained listeners generally showed opposite preferences in the second dimension, suggesting that trained listeners have a higher preference for headphone reproduction than untrained listeners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目前国内使用了许多空间音频再现系统(如单声道、立体声、环绕声、条形音箱和耳机)。在一项实验中,从训练有素和未经训练的听众中收集了一系列这样的系统的成对偏好等级。使用内部偏好映射对评级进行分析:(i)揭示听众偏好的主要感知维度;(ii)根据重要的感知属性标记维度;(三)观察受过训练和未受过训练的听众之间的差异。为了帮助标记维度,感知属性与偏好评级一起被引出,并通过以下方式进行分析:(i)考虑从每个属性的使用频率和相关偏好判断的大小派生的度量;(ii)观察属性的使用,以便在特定方法之间进行比较。第一个偏好维度占评分差异的90%以上;所有参与者都表现出对与第一个维度正相关的再现方法的偏好(最明显的是5、9和22声道环绕声)。这个维度与多个重要属性有关,包括与空间能力和无扭曲相关的属性。第二个维度只占方差的很小一部分,并且似乎将耳机方法与其他方法分开。受过训练的听众和未受过训练的听众在第二次元上普遍表现出相反的偏好,这表明受过训练的听众比未受过训练的听众对耳机再现的偏好更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determining and labeling the preference dimensions of spatial audio replay
There are currently many spatial audio reproduction systems in domestic use (e.g. mono, stereo, surround sound, sound bars, and headphones). In an experiment, pairwise preference magnitude ratings for a range of such systems were collected from trained and untrained listeners. The ratings were analysed using internal preference mapping to: (i) uncover the principal perceptual dimensions of listener preference; (ii) label the dimensions based on important perceptual attributes; and (iii) observe differences between trained and untrained listeners. To aid with labelling the dimensions, perceptual attributes were elicited alongside the preference ratings and were analysed by: (i) considering a metric derived from the frequency of use of each attribute and the magnitude of the related preference judgements; and (ii) observing attribute use for comparisons between specific methods. The first preference dimension accounted for over 90% of the variance in ratings; all participants exhibited a preference for reproduction methods that were positively correlated with the first dimension (most notably 5-, 9-, and 22-channel surround sound). This dimension was related to multiple important attributes, including those associated with spatial capability and absence of distortions. The second dimension accounted for only a very small proportion of the variance, and appeared to separate the headphone method from the other methods. The trained and untrained listeners generally showed opposite preferences in the second dimension, suggesting that trained listeners have a higher preference for headphone reproduction than untrained listeners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perception and automated assessment of audio quality in user generated content: An improved model Software to Stress Test Image Quality Estimators Closing the gap: Visual quality assessment considering viewing conditions Towards training naïve participants for a perceptual annotation task designed for experts Spatio-temporal error concealment technique for high order multiple description coding schemes including subjective assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1