老年人可能不适当的药物:2012年Beers标准的回顾及其对痴呆患者的影响

N. Brandt, T. Turner
{"title":"老年人可能不适当的药物:2012年Beers标准的回顾及其对痴呆患者的影响","authors":"N. Brandt, T. Turner","doi":"10.9740/MHC.N204331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2012, the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), along with a panel of 11 experts, updated the Beers Criteria which has evolved significantly since its inception in 1991. The Beers Criteria, in general, classifies medications/medication classes as: (1) potentially inappropriate for use in all older adults, (2) potentially inappropriate for older adults with certain diseases or symptoms and (3) requiring extra caution when used in older adults. Although each patient must be evaluated individually, the Beers Criteria is a useful clinical tool that can be used when initiating pharmacologic agents in both ambulatory and institutionalized patients. The concept behind use of the Beers Criteria is that it allows prescribers to readily identify, and avoid, medications associated with negative outcomes in older adults therefore decreasing the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Within this review article, there will be a highlight of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) commonly seen in clinical practice se...","PeriodicalId":18691,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Clinician","volume":"17 1","pages":"166-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potentially inappropriate medications in older adults: A review of the 2012 Beers Criteria and the implications in persons with dementia\",\"authors\":\"N. Brandt, T. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.9740/MHC.N204331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2012, the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), along with a panel of 11 experts, updated the Beers Criteria which has evolved significantly since its inception in 1991. The Beers Criteria, in general, classifies medications/medication classes as: (1) potentially inappropriate for use in all older adults, (2) potentially inappropriate for older adults with certain diseases or symptoms and (3) requiring extra caution when used in older adults. Although each patient must be evaluated individually, the Beers Criteria is a useful clinical tool that can be used when initiating pharmacologic agents in both ambulatory and institutionalized patients. The concept behind use of the Beers Criteria is that it allows prescribers to readily identify, and avoid, medications associated with negative outcomes in older adults therefore decreasing the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Within this review article, there will be a highlight of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) commonly seen in clinical practice se...\",\"PeriodicalId\":18691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health Clinician\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"166-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health Clinician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9740/MHC.N204331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/MHC.N204331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

2012年,美国老年医学会(AGS)和一个由11名专家组成的小组更新了比尔斯标准,该标准自1991年成立以来已经发生了重大变化。总的来说,比尔斯标准将药物/药物分类为:(1)可能不适合所有老年人使用,(2)可能不适合患有某些疾病或症状的老年人使用,(3)在老年人中使用时需要特别小心。虽然每个病人都必须单独评估,但比尔斯标准是一个有用的临床工具,可用于在门诊和住院病人中启动药物治疗。使用比尔斯标准背后的概念是,它允许处方者容易识别和避免与老年人负面结果相关的药物,从而降低药物不良事件(ADEs)的风险。在这篇综述文章中,将重点介绍临床实践中常见的潜在不适当药物(PIMs)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Potentially inappropriate medications in older adults: A review of the 2012 Beers Criteria and the implications in persons with dementia
In 2012, the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), along with a panel of 11 experts, updated the Beers Criteria which has evolved significantly since its inception in 1991. The Beers Criteria, in general, classifies medications/medication classes as: (1) potentially inappropriate for use in all older adults, (2) potentially inappropriate for older adults with certain diseases or symptoms and (3) requiring extra caution when used in older adults. Although each patient must be evaluated individually, the Beers Criteria is a useful clinical tool that can be used when initiating pharmacologic agents in both ambulatory and institutionalized patients. The concept behind use of the Beers Criteria is that it allows prescribers to readily identify, and avoid, medications associated with negative outcomes in older adults therefore decreasing the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Within this review article, there will be a highlight of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) commonly seen in clinical practice se...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorder and comorbid adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Training student pharmacists to administer long-acting injectable medications AAPP 2024 Annual Meeting Poster Abstracts Clozapine clinical toolkit optimizes inpatient clozapine monitoring Evidence and clinical considerations for the use of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of painful neuropathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1