无涂层、PVD、CVD和MTCVD涂层硬质合金刀片干式车削AISI4140钢性能的比较研究

IF 1.3 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.3311/ppme.18591
Billel Hamadi, M. Yallese, L. Boulanouar, A. Khellaf, A. Haddad
{"title":"无涂层、PVD、CVD和MTCVD涂层硬质合金刀片干式车削AISI4140钢性能的比较研究","authors":"Billel Hamadi, M. Yallese, L. Boulanouar, A. Khellaf, A. Haddad","doi":"10.3311/ppme.18591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental study has been carried out to investigate and compare the cutting tool performances represented by insert wear, surface roughness and cutting forces of an uncoated carbide (H13A) and three coated carbides GC2015 ( TiCN / Al2O3 / TiN ), GC1015 (TiN) and GC4215 ( TiCN / Al2O3 ) during the dry turning of AISI4140 steel. Turning was carried out during 5 minutes on cylindrical specimens (80 mm diameter and 400 mm cutting length) along with a depth of 0.5 mm, a feed rate of 0.08 mm/rev, and with a cutting speed of 350 m/min. The wear results show the effectiveness of both GC2015 and GC4215 cutting inserts where the flank wear rate of the monolayer insert (GC1015) reaches approximately 2 times that of the bilayer insert (GC4215) and 4-times that of the multilayer insert (GC2015), while insert H13A demonstrated the highest wear. Moreover, SEM analysis shows that abrasion, adhesion and chipping are the dominant wear mechanisms. The surface quality obtained with the coated GC2015 insert is found to be 1.38, 1.63 and 4.63 times better than those obtained with GC4215, GC1015 and H13A inserts respectively. Finally, the coated GC2015 (CVD) cutting insert is identified as the leading material in terms of cutting force as the results found show that the ratios are ( Ft-GC4215 / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.05, ( Ft-GC1015 / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.13 and ( Ft-H13A / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.77.","PeriodicalId":43630,"journal":{"name":"PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of the Performance of Uncoated, PVD, CVD and MTCVD Coated Carbide Inserts in Dry Turning of AISI4140 Steel\",\"authors\":\"Billel Hamadi, M. Yallese, L. Boulanouar, A. Khellaf, A. Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.3311/ppme.18591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experimental study has been carried out to investigate and compare the cutting tool performances represented by insert wear, surface roughness and cutting forces of an uncoated carbide (H13A) and three coated carbides GC2015 ( TiCN / Al2O3 / TiN ), GC1015 (TiN) and GC4215 ( TiCN / Al2O3 ) during the dry turning of AISI4140 steel. Turning was carried out during 5 minutes on cylindrical specimens (80 mm diameter and 400 mm cutting length) along with a depth of 0.5 mm, a feed rate of 0.08 mm/rev, and with a cutting speed of 350 m/min. The wear results show the effectiveness of both GC2015 and GC4215 cutting inserts where the flank wear rate of the monolayer insert (GC1015) reaches approximately 2 times that of the bilayer insert (GC4215) and 4-times that of the multilayer insert (GC2015), while insert H13A demonstrated the highest wear. Moreover, SEM analysis shows that abrasion, adhesion and chipping are the dominant wear mechanisms. The surface quality obtained with the coated GC2015 insert is found to be 1.38, 1.63 and 4.63 times better than those obtained with GC4215, GC1015 and H13A inserts respectively. Finally, the coated GC2015 (CVD) cutting insert is identified as the leading material in terms of cutting force as the results found show that the ratios are ( Ft-GC4215 / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.05, ( Ft-GC1015 / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.13 and ( Ft-H13A / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.77.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3311/ppme.18591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/ppme.18591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对AISI4140钢干车削过程中,未涂覆硬质合金(H13A)和涂覆硬质合金GC2015 (TiCN / Al2O3 / TiN)、GC1015 (TiN)和GC4215 (TiCN / Al2O3)的刀具切削性能进行了试验研究和比较。在5分钟内对圆柱形试样(直径为80 mm,切削长度为400 mm)进行车削,车削深度为0.5 mm,进给速度为0.08 mm/rev,切削速度为350 m/min。磨损结果表明,GC2015和GC4215切削齿都是有效的,其中单层齿(GC1015)的齿面磨损率约为双层齿(GC4215)的2倍,多层齿(GC2015)的4倍,而H13A齿的磨损率最高。此外,SEM分析表明,磨损、粘附和切屑是主要的磨损机制。GC2015涂层刀片的表面质量分别是GC4215、GC1015和H13A涂层刀片的1.38倍、1.63倍和4.63倍。最后,涂层GC2015 (CVD)切削齿在切削力方面的比值为(Ft-GC4215 / Ft-GC2015) = 1.05, (Ft-GC1015 / Ft-GC2015) = 1.13和(Ft-H13A / Ft-GC2015) = 1.77,从而确定了涂层GC2015 (CVD)切削齿为领先材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of the Performance of Uncoated, PVD, CVD and MTCVD Coated Carbide Inserts in Dry Turning of AISI4140 Steel
An experimental study has been carried out to investigate and compare the cutting tool performances represented by insert wear, surface roughness and cutting forces of an uncoated carbide (H13A) and three coated carbides GC2015 ( TiCN / Al2O3 / TiN ), GC1015 (TiN) and GC4215 ( TiCN / Al2O3 ) during the dry turning of AISI4140 steel. Turning was carried out during 5 minutes on cylindrical specimens (80 mm diameter and 400 mm cutting length) along with a depth of 0.5 mm, a feed rate of 0.08 mm/rev, and with a cutting speed of 350 m/min. The wear results show the effectiveness of both GC2015 and GC4215 cutting inserts where the flank wear rate of the monolayer insert (GC1015) reaches approximately 2 times that of the bilayer insert (GC4215) and 4-times that of the multilayer insert (GC2015), while insert H13A demonstrated the highest wear. Moreover, SEM analysis shows that abrasion, adhesion and chipping are the dominant wear mechanisms. The surface quality obtained with the coated GC2015 insert is found to be 1.38, 1.63 and 4.63 times better than those obtained with GC4215, GC1015 and H13A inserts respectively. Finally, the coated GC2015 (CVD) cutting insert is identified as the leading material in terms of cutting force as the results found show that the ratios are ( Ft-GC4215 / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.05, ( Ft-GC1015 / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.13 and ( Ft-H13A / Ft-GC2015 ) = 1.77.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Periodica Polytechnica is a publisher of the Budapest University of Technology and Economics. It publishes seven international journals (Architecture, Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Social and Management Sciences, Transportation Engineering). The journals have free electronic versions.
期刊最新文献
Investigating Particle Paths in Intracranial Aneurysms: A Parametric Study The Critical Length is a Good Measure to Distinguish between Stick Balancing in the ML and AP Directions Global Approach on the Shear and Cross Tension Strength of Resistance Spot Welded Thin Steel Sheets Photovoltaic Energy Generation in Hungary: Potentials of Green Hydrogen Production by PEM Technology Numerical Analysis to Investigate the Impact of Skirt Geometric Parameters on Secondary Piston Movement in a Single-cylinder Diesel Engine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1