{"title":"“不如建一座桥……”用荷兰和亨利奥特的实践周期来辨析非洲改革宗宣教学","authors":"Rw Nel","doi":"10.5952/55-1-2-525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reformed churches in Africa need bridge-building, uniting\n ecclesiologies. From the challenges on local congregational, but also at\n denominational level, it seems as if ecclesial apartheid (sadly) remains. From an\n (Southern) African Reformed perspective, I argue however that all is not lost. The\n question is how can our different theologies bridge these gaps? In this respect, the\n current conversations on “missional” and “emergent church” may be signs of hope.\n These notions can play a key role in bridging this gap between an ecclesiocentric,\n colonial ecclesiology and postcolonial ecclesiologies, which discern the Missio Dei\n afresh in the contemporary context. In my recent doctoral research I took up this\n challenge and used an adapted or what I prefer to call a “remixed” version of a\n praxis methodology to develop postcolonial (Southern] African missional\n ecclesiologies. I reflect on the usage of this methodology in order to make\n proposals on its relevance in the wider discourse on developing African missional\n ecclesiologies.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“It is better to build a bridge…” Using the praxis cycle of Holland and Henriot in discerning an African Reformed missional ecclesiology\",\"authors\":\"Rw Nel\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/55-1-2-525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reformed churches in Africa need bridge-building, uniting\\n ecclesiologies. From the challenges on local congregational, but also at\\n denominational level, it seems as if ecclesial apartheid (sadly) remains. From an\\n (Southern) African Reformed perspective, I argue however that all is not lost. The\\n question is how can our different theologies bridge these gaps? In this respect, the\\n current conversations on “missional” and “emergent church” may be signs of hope.\\n These notions can play a key role in bridging this gap between an ecclesiocentric,\\n colonial ecclesiology and postcolonial ecclesiologies, which discern the Missio Dei\\n afresh in the contemporary context. In my recent doctoral research I took up this\\n challenge and used an adapted or what I prefer to call a “remixed” version of a\\n praxis methodology to develop postcolonial (Southern] African missional\\n ecclesiologies. I reflect on the usage of this methodology in order to make\\n proposals on its relevance in the wider discourse on developing African missional\\n ecclesiologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-1-2-525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-1-2-525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“It is better to build a bridge…” Using the praxis cycle of Holland and Henriot in discerning an African Reformed missional ecclesiology
Reformed churches in Africa need bridge-building, uniting
ecclesiologies. From the challenges on local congregational, but also at
denominational level, it seems as if ecclesial apartheid (sadly) remains. From an
(Southern) African Reformed perspective, I argue however that all is not lost. The
question is how can our different theologies bridge these gaps? In this respect, the
current conversations on “missional” and “emergent church” may be signs of hope.
These notions can play a key role in bridging this gap between an ecclesiocentric,
colonial ecclesiology and postcolonial ecclesiologies, which discern the Missio Dei
afresh in the contemporary context. In my recent doctoral research I took up this
challenge and used an adapted or what I prefer to call a “remixed” version of a
praxis methodology to develop postcolonial (Southern] African missional
ecclesiologies. I reflect on the usage of this methodology in order to make
proposals on its relevance in the wider discourse on developing African missional
ecclesiologies.