从美国油气供应的经济勘探模型考察价格弹性

Carol Dahl, Thomas E. Duggan
{"title":"从美国油气供应的经济勘探模型考察价格弹性","authors":"Carol Dahl,&nbsp;Thomas E. Duggan","doi":"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80072-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exploration for oil or gas reserves consists of searching for and finding new reserves. It begins with the study of the geology of an area followed by exploratory or wildcat drilling in promising areas. How much oil or gas is found or the supply of new reserves is a function of exploration, the geology of the area drilled along with a random component measuring the fickleness of mother nature in yielding up her treasures to mere mortals. Knowing how oil and gas prices affect this process (price elasticities) is valuable to those who are involved with this strategic industry. Economic theory suggests that the search for petroleum is affected by prices and can be characterized by functions representing geophysical activities and drilling while the finding of reserves can be characterized by some sort of discovery process. The earliest econometric approach to modeling oil and gas exploration, which yielded price elasticities, was to estimate the search process using a function for wildcat wells drilled (Ww). For example, the discovery process for oil was represented using two equations: a success rate equation % of wells that are commercially successful (W/Ww) and an average oil reserve per successful well equation (O/W). Each of these three dependent variables were dependent on price and other relevant variables. The product of these three variables (Ww<sup>∗</sup>W/Ww<sup>∗</sup>O/W) yields the supply of oil reserves (O). In this paper we survey all U.S. exploration models for oil and gas that include wells drilled, share of successful wells, average reserves per well, or total reserve equations. We focus our survey on price elasticities to capture the effect of market price on the exploration process. Drilling equation results tend to be good with drilling strongly influenced by oil price and we suspect the long run drilling oil price elasticity to be greated than 1. It is much less clear how natural gas prices have affected drilling but their effect seems to be increasing. The most important issue in drilling equations besides including the correct economic variables is more work to clarify what geological variables provide the best forecasts. The econometric estimates for successful wells and average reserves per wells are much poorer and we would recommend more systematic work on discovery models to determine which perform the best.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 129-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80072-6","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of price elasticities from economic exploration models of US oil and gas supply\",\"authors\":\"Carol Dahl,&nbsp;Thomas E. Duggan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80072-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Exploration for oil or gas reserves consists of searching for and finding new reserves. It begins with the study of the geology of an area followed by exploratory or wildcat drilling in promising areas. How much oil or gas is found or the supply of new reserves is a function of exploration, the geology of the area drilled along with a random component measuring the fickleness of mother nature in yielding up her treasures to mere mortals. Knowing how oil and gas prices affect this process (price elasticities) is valuable to those who are involved with this strategic industry. Economic theory suggests that the search for petroleum is affected by prices and can be characterized by functions representing geophysical activities and drilling while the finding of reserves can be characterized by some sort of discovery process. The earliest econometric approach to modeling oil and gas exploration, which yielded price elasticities, was to estimate the search process using a function for wildcat wells drilled (Ww). For example, the discovery process for oil was represented using two equations: a success rate equation % of wells that are commercially successful (W/Ww) and an average oil reserve per successful well equation (O/W). Each of these three dependent variables were dependent on price and other relevant variables. The product of these three variables (Ww<sup>∗</sup>W/Ww<sup>∗</sup>O/W) yields the supply of oil reserves (O). In this paper we survey all U.S. exploration models for oil and gas that include wells drilled, share of successful wells, average reserves per well, or total reserve equations. We focus our survey on price elasticities to capture the effect of market price on the exploration process. Drilling equation results tend to be good with drilling strongly influenced by oil price and we suspect the long run drilling oil price elasticity to be greated than 1. It is much less clear how natural gas prices have affected drilling but their effect seems to be increasing. The most important issue in drilling equations besides including the correct economic variables is more work to clarify what geological variables provide the best forecasts. The econometric estimates for successful wells and average reserves per wells are much poorer and we would recommend more systematic work on discovery models to determine which perform the best.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 129-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80072-6\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085744399800726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085744399800726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

石油或天然气储量的勘探包括寻找和发现新的储量。它首先研究一个地区的地质,然后在有前途的地区进行勘探或野外钻探。发现了多少石油或天然气,或新储量的供应是勘探的一个函数,是钻探地区的地质情况,以及一个随机组成部分,衡量大自然母亲在把她的宝藏交给凡人时的反复无常。了解石油和天然气价格如何影响这一过程(价格弹性)对那些参与这一战略行业的人来说是有价值的。经济理论认为,寻找石油受价格的影响,可以用代表地球物理活动和钻探的函数来描述,而寻找储量则可以用某种发现过程来描述。最早对石油和天然气勘探建模的计量经济学方法是使用未钻探井(Ww)的函数来估计搜索过程,该方法产生了价格弹性。例如,石油的发现过程可以用两个方程来表示:商业成功井的成功率方程% (W/W)和每口成功井的平均石油储量方程(O/W)。这三个因变量中的每一个都依赖于价格和其他相关变量。这三个变量的乘积(Ww * W/Ww * O/W)得到石油储量的供应(O)。在本文中,我们调查了美国所有的石油和天然气勘探模型,包括钻探井、成功井的份额、每口井的平均储量或总储量方程。我们将调查重点放在价格弹性上,以捕捉市场价格对勘探过程的影响。当钻井受油价影响较大时,钻井方程结果趋于良好,我们推测长期钻井油价弹性大于1。目前尚不清楚天然气价格是如何影响钻探的,但其影响似乎正在增强。除了包括正确的经济变量外,钻井方程中最重要的问题是要做更多的工作来澄清哪些地质变量可以提供最好的预测。对于成功井和每口井的平均储量的计量经济学估计要差得多,我们建议对发现模型进行更系统的研究,以确定哪个模型表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survey of price elasticities from economic exploration models of US oil and gas supply

Exploration for oil or gas reserves consists of searching for and finding new reserves. It begins with the study of the geology of an area followed by exploratory or wildcat drilling in promising areas. How much oil or gas is found or the supply of new reserves is a function of exploration, the geology of the area drilled along with a random component measuring the fickleness of mother nature in yielding up her treasures to mere mortals. Knowing how oil and gas prices affect this process (price elasticities) is valuable to those who are involved with this strategic industry. Economic theory suggests that the search for petroleum is affected by prices and can be characterized by functions representing geophysical activities and drilling while the finding of reserves can be characterized by some sort of discovery process. The earliest econometric approach to modeling oil and gas exploration, which yielded price elasticities, was to estimate the search process using a function for wildcat wells drilled (Ww). For example, the discovery process for oil was represented using two equations: a success rate equation % of wells that are commercially successful (W/Ww) and an average oil reserve per successful well equation (O/W). Each of these three dependent variables were dependent on price and other relevant variables. The product of these three variables (WwW/WwO/W) yields the supply of oil reserves (O). In this paper we survey all U.S. exploration models for oil and gas that include wells drilled, share of successful wells, average reserves per well, or total reserve equations. We focus our survey on price elasticities to capture the effect of market price on the exploration process. Drilling equation results tend to be good with drilling strongly influenced by oil price and we suspect the long run drilling oil price elasticity to be greated than 1. It is much less clear how natural gas prices have affected drilling but their effect seems to be increasing. The most important issue in drilling equations besides including the correct economic variables is more work to clarify what geological variables provide the best forecasts. The econometric estimates for successful wells and average reserves per wells are much poorer and we would recommend more systematic work on discovery models to determine which perform the best.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimization of Energy Efficiency Barriers in the Context of Optimization of Management Decisions in the Process of Sustainable Development Household heterogeneity in valuation of heating energy costs ROLE OF BIG DATA IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOR FINANCIAL FRAUD Porous CoP@RGO With Pseudocapacitance Characteristics for Lithium Ion Storage Factors Affecting Renters’ Electricity Use: More than Split Incentives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1