助产士主导的护理:寻找产前模式的证据

RN, BA, MPH Donna Waters, RN, BHA Debora Picone, RN, CM, BHScMan, MNRes Helen Cooke, RN, CM, Grad Dip Comm Nurs, MMid Kate Dyer, RN, CM, BHSc, MN, DMid Pat Brodie, RN, BAppSc, MN, PhD Sandy Middleton
{"title":"助产士主导的护理:寻找产前模式的证据","authors":"RN, BA, MPH Donna Waters,&nbsp;RN, BHA Debora Picone,&nbsp;RN, CM, BHScMan, MNRes Helen Cooke,&nbsp;RN, CM, Grad Dip Comm Nurs, MMid Kate Dyer,&nbsp;RN, CM, BHSc, MN, DMid Pat Brodie,&nbsp;RN, BAppSc, MN, PhD Sandy Middleton","doi":"10.1016/S1448-8272(04)80005-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conducted as the first phase of the Improving Patient Outcomes Project, a structured literature review aimed to determine an evidence base for the development of a midwifery-led antenatal model of care. In particular, evidence was sought for those elements of antenatal care that were proven effective and were valued by women. There is good quality evidence that women are satisfied with receiving antenatal care from midwives and that antenatal visit schedules can be made more flexible. The literature provided practical assistance in defining maternity outcome measures but was not able to provide a strong evidence base for all aspects of antenatal care. This paper reports on a systematic approach to reviewing literature in which the intuitive and practical experience of expert reviewers and clinicians contributes to assessing the overall quality of currently available research evidence. This combined approach ensures a judicious and sensitive application of available evidence to the development of safe and appropriate models of care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100149,"journal":{"name":"Australian Midwifery","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1448-8272(04)80005-1","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midwifery-led care: finding evidence for an antenatal model\",\"authors\":\"RN, BA, MPH Donna Waters,&nbsp;RN, BHA Debora Picone,&nbsp;RN, CM, BHScMan, MNRes Helen Cooke,&nbsp;RN, CM, Grad Dip Comm Nurs, MMid Kate Dyer,&nbsp;RN, CM, BHSc, MN, DMid Pat Brodie,&nbsp;RN, BAppSc, MN, PhD Sandy Middleton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1448-8272(04)80005-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Conducted as the first phase of the Improving Patient Outcomes Project, a structured literature review aimed to determine an evidence base for the development of a midwifery-led antenatal model of care. In particular, evidence was sought for those elements of antenatal care that were proven effective and were valued by women. There is good quality evidence that women are satisfied with receiving antenatal care from midwives and that antenatal visit schedules can be made more flexible. The literature provided practical assistance in defining maternity outcome measures but was not able to provide a strong evidence base for all aspects of antenatal care. This paper reports on a systematic approach to reviewing literature in which the intuitive and practical experience of expert reviewers and clinicians contributes to assessing the overall quality of currently available research evidence. This combined approach ensures a judicious and sensitive application of available evidence to the development of safe and appropriate models of care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1448-8272(04)80005-1\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1448827204800051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1448827204800051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

作为改善患者预后项目的第一阶段,一项结构化的文献综述旨在为助产士主导的产前护理模式的发展确定证据基础。特别是寻求证据证明产前保健的那些要素是有效的,并受到妇女的重视。有高质量的证据表明,妇女对助产士提供的产前护理感到满意,产前检查时间表可以更加灵活。文献提供了实际的帮助,以确定产妇结果的措施,但不能提供强有力的证据基础的所有方面的产前保健。本文报告了一种系统的方法来审查文献,其中专家审稿人和临床医生的直觉和实践经验有助于评估当前可用的研究证据的整体质量。这种综合方法确保明智和敏感地应用现有证据,以发展安全和适当的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midwifery-led care: finding evidence for an antenatal model

Conducted as the first phase of the Improving Patient Outcomes Project, a structured literature review aimed to determine an evidence base for the development of a midwifery-led antenatal model of care. In particular, evidence was sought for those elements of antenatal care that were proven effective and were valued by women. There is good quality evidence that women are satisfied with receiving antenatal care from midwives and that antenatal visit schedules can be made more flexible. The literature provided practical assistance in defining maternity outcome measures but was not able to provide a strong evidence base for all aspects of antenatal care. This paper reports on a systematic approach to reviewing literature in which the intuitive and practical experience of expert reviewers and clinicians contributes to assessing the overall quality of currently available research evidence. This combined approach ensures a judicious and sensitive application of available evidence to the development of safe and appropriate models of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher degree abstracts ‘Multidisciplinary collaboration’ and ‘team work’: misnomers for subjugation? The emotional impact on mothers and midwives of conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics Australian college of midwifery journal to be reborn The experiences of a first cohort of Bachelor of Midwifery students, Victoria, Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1