印度尼西亚南苏门答腊波斯高血压自我管理问卷的翻译、文化适应和心理测量验证

IF 2.4 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Practice-Granada Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2823
Yopi Rikmasari, T. Andayani, S. A. Kristina, D. Endarti
{"title":"印度尼西亚南苏门答腊波斯高血压自我管理问卷的翻译、文化适应和心理测量验证","authors":"Yopi Rikmasari, T. Andayani, S. A. Kristina, D. Endarti","doi":"10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poor self-management has been associated with uncontrolled blood pressure in hypertensive patients. A valid instrument is needed to assess the self-management of hypertensive patients, especially to measure self-management changes after health workers’ intervention. Objective: To examine the psychometric properties Persian Hypertension Self-Management Questionnaire among patients with hypertension in Indonesia. Methods: Data collection was carried out cross-sectionally using convenience sampling; obtained 407 hypertensive patients in ten primary health centers in South Sumatra Province. The translation of the questionnaire has been carried out by applying forward-backward methods. The Face validity test based on respondents’ responses to each question item was evaluated descriptively. We evaluated content validity by an expert with qualitative and quantitative; known group validity was analyzed using chi-square. Internal consistency reliability test using Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability using Pearson correlation test or Pearson Spearman rank correlation. Results: Content validity by the expert shows sentence improvement, and CVI value = 1.00. Face validity shows that respondents can understand well to the questionnaire, and the known group validity was considered very good, as indicated by a significant relationship between the level of self-management and blood pressure control (p <0.001). The reliability assessment on internal consistency was 0.823 with a range of values for each domain, namely 0.710 - 0.823, and Test-retest reliability of 0.707 (p <0.001) with values ranging from 0.600 - 0.906. Conclusions: The Persian Hypertension Self-Management Questionnaire has been translated into the Indonesian version and has satisfactory validity and reliability for assessing self-management in hypertensive patients in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":51762,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian hypertension self-management questionnaire in South Sumatera, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Yopi Rikmasari, T. Andayani, S. A. Kristina, D. Endarti\",\"doi\":\"10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Poor self-management has been associated with uncontrolled blood pressure in hypertensive patients. A valid instrument is needed to assess the self-management of hypertensive patients, especially to measure self-management changes after health workers’ intervention. Objective: To examine the psychometric properties Persian Hypertension Self-Management Questionnaire among patients with hypertension in Indonesia. Methods: Data collection was carried out cross-sectionally using convenience sampling; obtained 407 hypertensive patients in ten primary health centers in South Sumatra Province. The translation of the questionnaire has been carried out by applying forward-backward methods. The Face validity test based on respondents’ responses to each question item was evaluated descriptively. We evaluated content validity by an expert with qualitative and quantitative; known group validity was analyzed using chi-square. Internal consistency reliability test using Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability using Pearson correlation test or Pearson Spearman rank correlation. Results: Content validity by the expert shows sentence improvement, and CVI value = 1.00. Face validity shows that respondents can understand well to the questionnaire, and the known group validity was considered very good, as indicated by a significant relationship between the level of self-management and blood pressure control (p <0.001). The reliability assessment on internal consistency was 0.823 with a range of values for each domain, namely 0.710 - 0.823, and Test-retest reliability of 0.707 (p <0.001) with values ranging from 0.600 - 0.906. Conclusions: The Persian Hypertension Self-Management Questionnaire has been translated into the Indonesian version and has satisfactory validity and reliability for assessing self-management in hypertensive patients in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy Practice-Granada\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy Practice-Granada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2023.2.2823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高血压患者自我管理不良与血压失控有关。需要一种有效的工具来评估高血压患者的自我管理,特别是衡量卫生工作者干预后的自我管理变化。目的:探讨印度尼西亚高血压患者波斯高血压自我管理问卷的心理测量特征。方法:采用方便抽样法进行横断面数据采集;在南苏门答腊省的10个初级保健中心获得了407名高血压患者。问卷的翻译采用正向-倒向法。基于被调查者对每个问题的回答,对面孔效度测试进行描述性评估。我们由专家对内容效度进行定性和定量评估;已知组效度采用卡方分析。内部一致性信度检验采用Cronbach alpha,重测信度采用Pearson相关检验或Pearson Spearman秩相关。结果:专家的内容效度显示句子改善,CVI值= 1.00。面孔效度表明被调查者能够很好地理解问卷,已知组效度被认为非常好,自我管理水平与血压控制之间存在显著关系(p <0.001)。内部一致性信度评价为0.823,各域取值范围为0.710 ~ 0.823,Test-retest信度评价为0.707 (p <0.001),各域取值范围为0.600 ~ 0.906。结论:《波斯高血压自我管理问卷》已翻译成印尼语版本,在评估印尼高血压患者自我管理方面具有满意的效度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian hypertension self-management questionnaire in South Sumatera, Indonesia
Background: Poor self-management has been associated with uncontrolled blood pressure in hypertensive patients. A valid instrument is needed to assess the self-management of hypertensive patients, especially to measure self-management changes after health workers’ intervention. Objective: To examine the psychometric properties Persian Hypertension Self-Management Questionnaire among patients with hypertension in Indonesia. Methods: Data collection was carried out cross-sectionally using convenience sampling; obtained 407 hypertensive patients in ten primary health centers in South Sumatra Province. The translation of the questionnaire has been carried out by applying forward-backward methods. The Face validity test based on respondents’ responses to each question item was evaluated descriptively. We evaluated content validity by an expert with qualitative and quantitative; known group validity was analyzed using chi-square. Internal consistency reliability test using Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability using Pearson correlation test or Pearson Spearman rank correlation. Results: Content validity by the expert shows sentence improvement, and CVI value = 1.00. Face validity shows that respondents can understand well to the questionnaire, and the known group validity was considered very good, as indicated by a significant relationship between the level of self-management and blood pressure control (p <0.001). The reliability assessment on internal consistency was 0.823 with a range of values for each domain, namely 0.710 - 0.823, and Test-retest reliability of 0.707 (p <0.001) with values ranging from 0.600 - 0.906. Conclusions: The Persian Hypertension Self-Management Questionnaire has been translated into the Indonesian version and has satisfactory validity and reliability for assessing self-management in hypertensive patients in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy Practice-Granada
Pharmacy Practice-Granada PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Practice is a free full-text peer-reviewed journal with a scope on pharmacy practice. Pharmacy Practice is published quarterly. Pharmacy Practice does not charge and will never charge any publication fee or article processing charge (APC) to the authors. The current and future absence of any article processing charges (APCs) is signed in the MoU with the Center for Pharmacy Practice Innovation (CPPI) at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy. Pharmacy Practice is the consequence of the efforts of a number of colleagues from different Universities who belief in collaborative publishing: no one pays, no one receives. Although focusing on the practice of pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice covers a wide range of pharmacy activities, among them and not being comprehensive, clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, social pharmacy, pharmacy education, process and outcome research, health promotion and education, health informatics, pharmacoepidemiology, etc.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of a mental health literacy questionnaire for university students in Indonesia Mini review: The clinical avenues of combined hydralazine-nitrate in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Pharmacy licensees and their characters that affect Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) Compliance Factors related to non-adherence to antiretroviral treatment in children under 13 years of age Pattern of drug therapy related problems encountered by clinical pharmacists in a critical care setting in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1