D. Sirota, M. Zhulkov, D. Khvan, A. G. Makaev, A. Fomichev, H. Agaeva, A. Sabetov, B. Kozlov, A. Chernyavskiy
{"title":"金属支架和冷冻象鼻假体在主动脉夹层手术中的远期效果","authors":"D. Sirota, M. Zhulkov, D. Khvan, A. G. Makaev, A. Fomichev, H. Agaeva, A. Sabetov, B. Kozlov, A. Chernyavskiy","doi":"10.21688/1681-3472-2022-2-89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. Comparative assessment of long-term results of bare metal stents and frozen elephant trunk prosthesis using in aortic dissection I DeBakey type.Methods. The retrospective comparative evaluation of different surgery results (2001–2017) in 213 patients with DeBakey type I aortic dissection was performed. Patients was divided in to 3 groups: Group 1 — standard treatment (hemiarch or total arch replacement) (n = 121), Group 2 — arch reconstruction with bare metal stent (n = 55), Group 3 — arch reconstruction with frozen elephant trunk prosthesis (n = 37). For groups equation we used propensity score matching analysis (PSM).Results. A pairwise comparison with the formation of three groups equated by the PSM method was performed. Long-term mortality in PSM 1 was 88 [82; 96] % (Group 1) и 89 [79; 100] % — (Group 2) respectively (p = 0.893). Long-term mortality in PSM 2 was 85 [71; 100] % in Group 1 and 94 [84; 100] % — Group 3 respectively (p = 0.342). Long-term mortality in PSM 3 was 88 [77; 100] % in Group 2 и 80 [64; 100] % — Group 3 respectively (p = 0.457). Freedom from aortic and mortality events (surrogate end point) in PSM 1 was 68% and 75% (p>0.999), PSM 2 was 50% and 100% (p = 0.006), PSM 3 was 73% and 89% (p = 0.22).Conclusion. There were no any statistical differences in long-term mortality and in surrogate end point (aortic events and mortality) between groups, but there was a trend to better results in Group 3.","PeriodicalId":19853,"journal":{"name":"Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term results of bare metal stents and frozen elephant trunk prosthesis using in aortic dissection surgery\",\"authors\":\"D. Sirota, M. Zhulkov, D. Khvan, A. G. Makaev, A. Fomichev, H. Agaeva, A. Sabetov, B. Kozlov, A. Chernyavskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.21688/1681-3472-2022-2-89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. Comparative assessment of long-term results of bare metal stents and frozen elephant trunk prosthesis using in aortic dissection I DeBakey type.Methods. The retrospective comparative evaluation of different surgery results (2001–2017) in 213 patients with DeBakey type I aortic dissection was performed. Patients was divided in to 3 groups: Group 1 — standard treatment (hemiarch or total arch replacement) (n = 121), Group 2 — arch reconstruction with bare metal stent (n = 55), Group 3 — arch reconstruction with frozen elephant trunk prosthesis (n = 37). For groups equation we used propensity score matching analysis (PSM).Results. A pairwise comparison with the formation of three groups equated by the PSM method was performed. Long-term mortality in PSM 1 was 88 [82; 96] % (Group 1) и 89 [79; 100] % — (Group 2) respectively (p = 0.893). Long-term mortality in PSM 2 was 85 [71; 100] % in Group 1 and 94 [84; 100] % — Group 3 respectively (p = 0.342). Long-term mortality in PSM 3 was 88 [77; 100] % in Group 2 и 80 [64; 100] % — Group 3 respectively (p = 0.457). Freedom from aortic and mortality events (surrogate end point) in PSM 1 was 68% and 75% (p>0.999), PSM 2 was 50% and 100% (p = 0.006), PSM 3 was 73% and 89% (p = 0.22).Conclusion. There were no any statistical differences in long-term mortality and in surrogate end point (aortic events and mortality) between groups, but there was a trend to better results in Group 3.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2022-2-89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2022-2-89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term results of bare metal stents and frozen elephant trunk prosthesis using in aortic dissection surgery
Aim. Comparative assessment of long-term results of bare metal stents and frozen elephant trunk prosthesis using in aortic dissection I DeBakey type.Methods. The retrospective comparative evaluation of different surgery results (2001–2017) in 213 patients with DeBakey type I aortic dissection was performed. Patients was divided in to 3 groups: Group 1 — standard treatment (hemiarch or total arch replacement) (n = 121), Group 2 — arch reconstruction with bare metal stent (n = 55), Group 3 — arch reconstruction with frozen elephant trunk prosthesis (n = 37). For groups equation we used propensity score matching analysis (PSM).Results. A pairwise comparison with the formation of three groups equated by the PSM method was performed. Long-term mortality in PSM 1 was 88 [82; 96] % (Group 1) и 89 [79; 100] % — (Group 2) respectively (p = 0.893). Long-term mortality in PSM 2 was 85 [71; 100] % in Group 1 and 94 [84; 100] % — Group 3 respectively (p = 0.342). Long-term mortality in PSM 3 was 88 [77; 100] % in Group 2 и 80 [64; 100] % — Group 3 respectively (p = 0.457). Freedom from aortic and mortality events (surrogate end point) in PSM 1 was 68% and 75% (p>0.999), PSM 2 was 50% and 100% (p = 0.006), PSM 3 was 73% and 89% (p = 0.22).Conclusion. There were no any statistical differences in long-term mortality and in surrogate end point (aortic events and mortality) between groups, but there was a trend to better results in Group 3.