音乐思维:音乐家符号诱发声音意象的客观测量

IF 0.6 0 MUSIC Psychomusicology Pub Date : 2018-04-20 DOI:10.1037/pmu0000225
Anna Wolf, R. Kopiez, F. Platz
{"title":"音乐思维:音乐家符号诱发声音意象的客观测量","authors":"Anna Wolf, R. Kopiez, F. Platz","doi":"10.1037/pmu0000225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Being able to imagine the sound of music from notation as a result of so-called notational audiation, without the physical presence of sound, is an indispensable skill for professional musicians. However, up until now there has been no assessment for the evaluation of the skill responsible for the reading-imagery task. The development of an assessment for the skill of using notation-evoked sound imagery (henceforth called NESI) described in this study was based on the embedded-melody paradigm. Participants first had to read a figural variation from notation and imagine the sound without singing or humming. After the notation disappeared from the screen, the sound of a theme was played, which either matched the original melody harmonically or contained small but significant deviations from the original harmonic progression (the so-called “lure” variation). Participants had to decide whether the variation and theme matched in terms of their harmonic structure. We analyzed the item characteristics in three pilot studies to select a reduced and validated number of item triads. Internal validity and unidimensionality were tested by use of item response theory. In the main study, this selection of item triads was validated by a sample of N = 55 music students in a comprehensive test setting to determine correlations with other subskills such as ear training skills, absolute pitch, working memory capacity, or melodic memory. The final path model showed that NESI has a strong relationship with general ear training skills but is only slightly correlated with working memory, spatial orientation and melodic memory.","PeriodicalId":29942,"journal":{"name":"Psychomusicology","volume":"47 1","pages":"209–221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thinking in Music: An Objective Measure of Notation-Evoked Sound Imagery in Musicians\",\"authors\":\"Anna Wolf, R. Kopiez, F. Platz\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pmu0000225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Being able to imagine the sound of music from notation as a result of so-called notational audiation, without the physical presence of sound, is an indispensable skill for professional musicians. However, up until now there has been no assessment for the evaluation of the skill responsible for the reading-imagery task. The development of an assessment for the skill of using notation-evoked sound imagery (henceforth called NESI) described in this study was based on the embedded-melody paradigm. Participants first had to read a figural variation from notation and imagine the sound without singing or humming. After the notation disappeared from the screen, the sound of a theme was played, which either matched the original melody harmonically or contained small but significant deviations from the original harmonic progression (the so-called “lure” variation). Participants had to decide whether the variation and theme matched in terms of their harmonic structure. We analyzed the item characteristics in three pilot studies to select a reduced and validated number of item triads. Internal validity and unidimensionality were tested by use of item response theory. In the main study, this selection of item triads was validated by a sample of N = 55 music students in a comprehensive test setting to determine correlations with other subskills such as ear training skills, absolute pitch, working memory capacity, or melodic memory. The final path model showed that NESI has a strong relationship with general ear training skills but is only slightly correlated with working memory, spatial orientation and melodic memory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychomusicology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"209–221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychomusicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychomusicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对于专业音乐家来说,能够通过所谓的符号试听来想象音乐的声音,而不需要实际的声音存在,这是一项不可或缺的技能。然而,到目前为止,还没有对阅读-意象任务的技能进行评估。本研究中描述的使用符号诱发声音意象(以下称为NESI)的技能评估的发展是基于嵌入旋律范式的。参与者首先要从乐谱中读出一个数字变化,并在不唱歌或哼唱的情况下想象这个声音。在乐谱从屏幕上消失后,播放一个主题的声音,这个声音要么与原始旋律和谐地匹配,要么与原始和声进程有微小但显著的偏差(所谓的“lure”变奏)。参与者必须判断变奏和主题在和声结构上是否匹配。我们在三个试点研究中分析了项目特征,以选择减少和验证的项目三元组数量。采用项目反应理论进行内部效度和单维度性检验。在主要研究中,通过对N = 55名音乐学生进行综合测试,以确定与其他子技能(如耳朵训练技能、绝对音高、工作记忆容量或旋律记忆)的相关性。最后的路径模型显示NESI与一般耳训练技能有很强的关系,但与工作记忆、空间定向和旋律记忆只有轻微的相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thinking in Music: An Objective Measure of Notation-Evoked Sound Imagery in Musicians
Being able to imagine the sound of music from notation as a result of so-called notational audiation, without the physical presence of sound, is an indispensable skill for professional musicians. However, up until now there has been no assessment for the evaluation of the skill responsible for the reading-imagery task. The development of an assessment for the skill of using notation-evoked sound imagery (henceforth called NESI) described in this study was based on the embedded-melody paradigm. Participants first had to read a figural variation from notation and imagine the sound without singing or humming. After the notation disappeared from the screen, the sound of a theme was played, which either matched the original melody harmonically or contained small but significant deviations from the original harmonic progression (the so-called “lure” variation). Participants had to decide whether the variation and theme matched in terms of their harmonic structure. We analyzed the item characteristics in three pilot studies to select a reduced and validated number of item triads. Internal validity and unidimensionality were tested by use of item response theory. In the main study, this selection of item triads was validated by a sample of N = 55 music students in a comprehensive test setting to determine correlations with other subskills such as ear training skills, absolute pitch, working memory capacity, or melodic memory. The final path model showed that NESI has a strong relationship with general ear training skills but is only slightly correlated with working memory, spatial orientation and melodic memory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychomusicology
Psychomusicology Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Preferred Music Listening Does Not Affect Cognitive Inhibition in Young and Older Adults Preferred music listening does not affect cognitive inhibition in young and older adults. Capturing coordination and intentionality in joint musical improvisation. Supplemental Material for Capturing Coordination and Intentionality in Joint Musical Improvisation Absolute pitch: A literature review of underlying factors, with special regard to music pedagogy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1