{"title":"食物地理学“在”、“在”和“为了”人类世:介绍问题和主题","authors":"Damian Maye, Ben Coles, David Evans","doi":"10.1111/geoj.12456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Anthropocene provides a useful way to think through all manner of human–environment processes and challenges. This is especially pronounced in relation to food and farming, which are heavily implicated in changes to the Earth's biophysical and chemical processes. Yet, despite burgeoning interest in the Anthropocene as a concept, it is comparatively absent from recent developments in food geography. This is surprising given the profound impacts of food and agriculture on biogeochemical flows and geographical strata, and given future predictions regarding ‘Anthropogenic climate change.’ The objective of this Theme Issue therefore, and the five papers that comprise it, is to redress this by directly connecting and drawing together social science scholarship that examines food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene. The Theme Issue papers engage with different aspects of the Anthropocene as spatial phenomena and here we integrate relevant arguments from each, alongside wider agri-food geographical scholarship, to explain what we mean by food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene. In doing so, we respond to Tsing and colleagues' (2019, <i>Current Anthropology</i> 60, S186–97) call for a spatial as well as temporal treatment of the Anthropocene. These spatial expressions are also key to the proliferation of terms that have accompanied developments in Anthropocene scholarship. We conclude by offering up some brief reflections on a future research agenda. An important first step is to conceptualise food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene, including accounts that ground and potentially unsettle food and the Anthropocene as Capitalocene (Moore, 2016, <i>Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism</i>) and food and the Anthropocene as more-than-human (Haraway, 2016, <i>Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucen</i>). A second step is to address key contemporary Anthropogenic agri-food relations, especially those that are already in flux or transition. A final priority for future research is to deepen and extend the ethics of care and moral food geographies of the Anthropocene imperative.</p><p>The objective of this Theme Issue, and the five papers that comprise it, is to connect and draw together social science scholarship that examines food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene.</p>","PeriodicalId":48023,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Journal","volume":"188 3","pages":"310-317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food geographies ‘in’, ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene: Introducing the issue and main themes\",\"authors\":\"Damian Maye, Ben Coles, David Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geoj.12456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Anthropocene provides a useful way to think through all manner of human–environment processes and challenges. This is especially pronounced in relation to food and farming, which are heavily implicated in changes to the Earth's biophysical and chemical processes. Yet, despite burgeoning interest in the Anthropocene as a concept, it is comparatively absent from recent developments in food geography. This is surprising given the profound impacts of food and agriculture on biogeochemical flows and geographical strata, and given future predictions regarding ‘Anthropogenic climate change.’ The objective of this Theme Issue therefore, and the five papers that comprise it, is to redress this by directly connecting and drawing together social science scholarship that examines food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene. The Theme Issue papers engage with different aspects of the Anthropocene as spatial phenomena and here we integrate relevant arguments from each, alongside wider agri-food geographical scholarship, to explain what we mean by food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene. In doing so, we respond to Tsing and colleagues' (2019, <i>Current Anthropology</i> 60, S186–97) call for a spatial as well as temporal treatment of the Anthropocene. These spatial expressions are also key to the proliferation of terms that have accompanied developments in Anthropocene scholarship. We conclude by offering up some brief reflections on a future research agenda. An important first step is to conceptualise food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene, including accounts that ground and potentially unsettle food and the Anthropocene as Capitalocene (Moore, 2016, <i>Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism</i>) and food and the Anthropocene as more-than-human (Haraway, 2016, <i>Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucen</i>). A second step is to address key contemporary Anthropogenic agri-food relations, especially those that are already in flux or transition. A final priority for future research is to deepen and extend the ethics of care and moral food geographies of the Anthropocene imperative.</p><p>The objective of this Theme Issue, and the five papers that comprise it, is to connect and draw together social science scholarship that examines food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographical Journal\",\"volume\":\"188 3\",\"pages\":\"310-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoj.12456\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoj.12456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
人类世提供了一种有用的方式来思考各种各样的人类环境过程和挑战。这一点在粮食和农业方面尤其明显,因为它们与地球生物物理和化学过程的变化密切相关。然而,尽管对人类世作为一个概念的兴趣日益浓厚,但它在最近的食品地理学发展中相对缺席。考虑到粮食和农业对生物地球化学流动和地理地层的深远影响,以及对“人为气候变化”的未来预测,这是令人惊讶的。因此,本期主题刊的目标,以及包含它的五篇论文,是通过直接连接和汇集社会科学研究来纠正这一问题,这些研究研究了“人类世”、“人类世”和“人类世”的食物地理学。主题问题论文涉及人类世作为空间现象的不同方面,在这里,我们整合了每个方面的相关论点,以及更广泛的农业食品地理学术,来解释我们所说的“人类世”、“人类世”和“人类世”的食品地理学。在这样做的过程中,我们回应了qing及其同事(2019,Current Anthropology 60, S186-97)对人类世的空间和时间处理的呼吁。这些空间表达也是伴随人类世学术发展的术语激增的关键。最后,我们对未来的研究议程提出了一些简短的思考。重要的第一步是将“人类世”、“人类世”和“人类世”的食物地理学概念化,包括将食物和人类世作为资本世(Moore, 2016, Anthropocene or Capitalocene?自然、历史和资本主义危机)、食物和人类世超越人类(哈拉威,2016,与麻烦同在:在克苏鲁森制造亲属)。第二步是解决当代关键的人为农业-食品关系,特别是那些已经处于变化或转变中的关系。未来研究的最后一个重点是深化和扩展人类世迫切需要的关怀伦理和道德食品地理学。本期主题刊的目标,以及组成本期主题刊的五篇论文,是将研究人类世“在”、“在”和“为”食物地理学的社会科学学术联系起来,并将其汇集在一起。
Food geographies ‘in’, ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene: Introducing the issue and main themes
The Anthropocene provides a useful way to think through all manner of human–environment processes and challenges. This is especially pronounced in relation to food and farming, which are heavily implicated in changes to the Earth's biophysical and chemical processes. Yet, despite burgeoning interest in the Anthropocene as a concept, it is comparatively absent from recent developments in food geography. This is surprising given the profound impacts of food and agriculture on biogeochemical flows and geographical strata, and given future predictions regarding ‘Anthropogenic climate change.’ The objective of this Theme Issue therefore, and the five papers that comprise it, is to redress this by directly connecting and drawing together social science scholarship that examines food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene. The Theme Issue papers engage with different aspects of the Anthropocene as spatial phenomena and here we integrate relevant arguments from each, alongside wider agri-food geographical scholarship, to explain what we mean by food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene. In doing so, we respond to Tsing and colleagues' (2019, Current Anthropology 60, S186–97) call for a spatial as well as temporal treatment of the Anthropocene. These spatial expressions are also key to the proliferation of terms that have accompanied developments in Anthropocene scholarship. We conclude by offering up some brief reflections on a future research agenda. An important first step is to conceptualise food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene, including accounts that ground and potentially unsettle food and the Anthropocene as Capitalocene (Moore, 2016, Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism) and food and the Anthropocene as more-than-human (Haraway, 2016, Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucen). A second step is to address key contemporary Anthropogenic agri-food relations, especially those that are already in flux or transition. A final priority for future research is to deepen and extend the ethics of care and moral food geographies of the Anthropocene imperative.
The objective of this Theme Issue, and the five papers that comprise it, is to connect and draw together social science scholarship that examines food geographies ‘in,’ ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Anthropocene.
期刊介绍:
The Geographical Journal has been the academic journal of the Royal Geographical Society, under the terms of the Royal Charter, since 1893. It publishes papers from across the entire subject of geography, with particular reference to public debates, policy-orientated agendas.