首发精神分裂症早期停药:有益还是危险?

W. Gaebel, L. Wunderink, M. Riesbeck
{"title":"首发精神分裂症早期停药:有益还是危险?","authors":"W. Gaebel, L. Wunderink, M. Riesbeck","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1672284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Background: After acute treatment of a first episode in schizophrenia, continued antipsychotic maintenance treatment (MT) is effective regarding (positive) symptom remission and relapse prevention. Nevertheless, due to unwanted effects patients and clinicians sooner or later are faced with the decision to continue or discontinue antipsychotics. Evidence indicates that risk for relapse or symptom recurrence is 2- to 5-times higher after personalized dose-reduction (PDR) or complete drug discontinuation, even if early intervention in case of early warning signs of relapse is applied. Method: A recent 7-year follow up of an 18 months RCT comparing MT with PDR however, revealed advantages of PDR regarding functional outcome and recovery. Although only one study with its specific characteristics limits generalization, the findings have newly fueled the debate whether early drug discontinuation-strategies have more risks or benefits. Result: The paper discusses the pros and cons of early drug discontinuation-strategies, in particular of PDR, after a first episode in schizophrenia and summarizes the empirical evidence to support patients and clinicians in this essential treatment decision.","PeriodicalId":49348,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Neurologie Und Psychiatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early medication discontinuation in first episode schizophrenia – beneficial or risky?\",\"authors\":\"W. Gaebel, L. Wunderink, M. Riesbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0038-1672284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Background: After acute treatment of a first episode in schizophrenia, continued antipsychotic maintenance treatment (MT) is effective regarding (positive) symptom remission and relapse prevention. Nevertheless, due to unwanted effects patients and clinicians sooner or later are faced with the decision to continue or discontinue antipsychotics. Evidence indicates that risk for relapse or symptom recurrence is 2- to 5-times higher after personalized dose-reduction (PDR) or complete drug discontinuation, even if early intervention in case of early warning signs of relapse is applied. Method: A recent 7-year follow up of an 18 months RCT comparing MT with PDR however, revealed advantages of PDR regarding functional outcome and recovery. Although only one study with its specific characteristics limits generalization, the findings have newly fueled the debate whether early drug discontinuation-strategies have more risks or benefits. Result: The paper discusses the pros and cons of early drug discontinuation-strategies, in particular of PDR, after a first episode in schizophrenia and summarizes the empirical evidence to support patients and clinicians in this essential treatment decision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Neurologie Und Psychiatrie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Neurologie Und Psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1672284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Neurologie Und Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1672284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:精神分裂症首次发作急性治疗后,持续抗精神病维持治疗(MT)对于(阳性)症状缓解和预防复发是有效的。然而,由于意想不到的影响,患者和临床医生迟早都面临着继续或停止抗精神病药物的决定。有证据表明,在个体化减量(PDR)或完全停药后,即使在出现早期复发迹象的情况下进行早期干预,复发或症状复发的风险也要高出2- 5倍。方法:最近一项为期7年的18个月的随机对照试验比较了MT和PDR,结果显示PDR在功能预后和恢复方面具有优势。尽管只有一项具有其特定特征的研究限制了推广,但这些发现再次引发了关于早期停药策略是风险更大还是益处更大的争论。结果:本文讨论了精神分裂症患者首发后早期停药策略的利弊,特别是PDR,并总结了支持患者和临床医生做出这一基本治疗决策的经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early medication discontinuation in first episode schizophrenia – beneficial or risky?
Summary Background: After acute treatment of a first episode in schizophrenia, continued antipsychotic maintenance treatment (MT) is effective regarding (positive) symptom remission and relapse prevention. Nevertheless, due to unwanted effects patients and clinicians sooner or later are faced with the decision to continue or discontinue antipsychotics. Evidence indicates that risk for relapse or symptom recurrence is 2- to 5-times higher after personalized dose-reduction (PDR) or complete drug discontinuation, even if early intervention in case of early warning signs of relapse is applied. Method: A recent 7-year follow up of an 18 months RCT comparing MT with PDR however, revealed advantages of PDR regarding functional outcome and recovery. Although only one study with its specific characteristics limits generalization, the findings have newly fueled the debate whether early drug discontinuation-strategies have more risks or benefits. Result: The paper discusses the pros and cons of early drug discontinuation-strategies, in particular of PDR, after a first episode in schizophrenia and summarizes the empirical evidence to support patients and clinicians in this essential treatment decision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ärztinnen und Ärzte emotional stark belastet Transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation für zu Hause - ein weiterer Therapieansatz bei ADHS? Geschlechtersensible Medizin bedeutet Fortschritt Mit früher und effektiver MS-Therapie die Plastizitätsreserve erhalten Skaten reduziert ADHS-Symptome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1