Pentacam和Keratron Scout测量角Kappa的比较

R. Shi, Wei Zhao, Ze-Hong Dong, Lijuan Sun, Xueting Chen, Lirong Dong, Jie Feng
{"title":"Pentacam和Keratron Scout测量角Kappa的比较","authors":"R. Shi, Wei Zhao, Ze-Hong Dong, Lijuan Sun, Xueting Chen, Lirong Dong, Jie Feng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo investigate and analyze the difference in angle Kappa measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout in refractive surgery patients. \n \n \nMethods: \nOne hundred ninety-six eyes of 98 patients screened for refractive surgery were enrolled in this case series study. Pupil diameters and angle Kappa expressed in rectangular coordinates were measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout. Data differences and correlation between the two examinations were compared and analyzed by a paired t test and Pearson correlation analysis. \n \n \nResults: \nPupil diameters measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout were 3.17±0.44 mm, 3.19±0.53 mm (right eye), and 3.25±0.65 mm, 3.33±0.48 mm (left eye), respectively. The differences between the two instruments were not significant. The horizontal and vertical offset measured by the two instruments were not statistically different. There was a significant correlation in the offset of the angle Kappa measured by the two instruments (P<0.05). The correlation coefficients of the right eye horizontal offset, right eye vertical offset, left eye horizontal offset, left eye vertical offset were 0.966, 0.969, 0.956 and 0.913, respectively. \n \n \nConclusion: \nThere is no statistically significant difference between angle Kappa measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout when pupil diameters are consistent. Both instruments can be used as a reference for the adjustment in angle Kappa in refractive surgery. \n \n \nKey words: \nPentacam; Keratron Scout; pupil diameter; angle kappa","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"20 1","pages":"826-830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Angle Kappa Measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout\",\"authors\":\"R. Shi, Wei Zhao, Ze-Hong Dong, Lijuan Sun, Xueting Chen, Lirong Dong, Jie Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo investigate and analyze the difference in angle Kappa measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout in refractive surgery patients. \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nOne hundred ninety-six eyes of 98 patients screened for refractive surgery were enrolled in this case series study. Pupil diameters and angle Kappa expressed in rectangular coordinates were measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout. Data differences and correlation between the two examinations were compared and analyzed by a paired t test and Pearson correlation analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nPupil diameters measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout were 3.17±0.44 mm, 3.19±0.53 mm (right eye), and 3.25±0.65 mm, 3.33±0.48 mm (left eye), respectively. The differences between the two instruments were not significant. The horizontal and vertical offset measured by the two instruments were not statistically different. There was a significant correlation in the offset of the angle Kappa measured by the two instruments (P<0.05). The correlation coefficients of the right eye horizontal offset, right eye vertical offset, left eye horizontal offset, left eye vertical offset were 0.966, 0.969, 0.956 and 0.913, respectively. \\n \\n \\nConclusion: \\nThere is no statistically significant difference between angle Kappa measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout when pupil diameters are consistent. Both instruments can be used as a reference for the adjustment in angle Kappa in refractive surgery. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nPentacam; Keratron Scout; pupil diameter; angle kappa\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"826-830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.11.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.11.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨和分析Pentacam与Keratron Scout在屈光手术患者中测量角度Kappa的差异。方法:98例接受屈光手术的患者共196只眼纳入本病例系列研究。用Pentacam和Keratron Scout测量瞳孔直径和角Kappa,用直角坐标表示。采用配对t检验和Pearson相关分析比较两项检查的数据差异和相关性。结果:Pentacam和Keratron Scout测量的瞳孔直径分别为右眼3.17±0.44 mm、3.19±0.53 mm和左眼3.25±0.65 mm、3.33±0.48 mm。两种仪器之间的差异不显著。两种仪器测量的水平和垂直偏移量无统计学差异。两种仪器测量的Kappa角偏移量有显著相关性(P<0.05)。右眼水平偏移、右眼垂直偏移、左眼水平偏移、左眼垂直偏移的相关系数分别为0.966、0.969、0.956、0.913。结论:在瞳孔直径一致的情况下,Pentacam和Keratron Scout测量的Kappa角差异无统计学意义。这两种仪器可作为屈光手术中调整Kappa角的参考。关键词:Pentacam;Keratron侦察;瞳孔直径;角卡巴
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Angle Kappa Measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout
Objective: To investigate and analyze the difference in angle Kappa measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout in refractive surgery patients. Methods: One hundred ninety-six eyes of 98 patients screened for refractive surgery were enrolled in this case series study. Pupil diameters and angle Kappa expressed in rectangular coordinates were measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout. Data differences and correlation between the two examinations were compared and analyzed by a paired t test and Pearson correlation analysis. Results: Pupil diameters measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout were 3.17±0.44 mm, 3.19±0.53 mm (right eye), and 3.25±0.65 mm, 3.33±0.48 mm (left eye), respectively. The differences between the two instruments were not significant. The horizontal and vertical offset measured by the two instruments were not statistically different. There was a significant correlation in the offset of the angle Kappa measured by the two instruments (P<0.05). The correlation coefficients of the right eye horizontal offset, right eye vertical offset, left eye horizontal offset, left eye vertical offset were 0.966, 0.969, 0.956 and 0.913, respectively. Conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference between angle Kappa measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout when pupil diameters are consistent. Both instruments can be used as a reference for the adjustment in angle Kappa in refractive surgery. Key words: Pentacam; Keratron Scout; pupil diameter; angle kappa
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1