氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗一线治疗后慢性淋巴细胞白血病复发患者首次抢救治疗的结果

Xavier Badoux, Constantine Tam, Susan Lerner, William Wierda, Michael J. Keating
{"title":"氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗一线治疗后慢性淋巴细胞白血病复发患者首次抢救治疗的结果","authors":"Xavier Badoux,&nbsp;Constantine Tam,&nbsp;Susan Lerner,&nbsp;William Wierda,&nbsp;Michael J. Keating","doi":"10.3816/CLM.2009.n.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients receiving salvage therapy for relapsed CLL following first-line FCR have overall response rates of 60% and median survival of 38 months. We describe pre-treatment characteristics predicting for outcome after salvage therapies. Patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy had better response rates and duration compared to antibody therapy alone.</p></div><div><h3>Brief Abstract</h3><p>Chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) is an effective initial therapy with an estimated 40% relapse rate at 6 years. There is no consensus salvage therapy for relapsed patients. All patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who relapsed or were refractory following first-line FCR administered between July 1999 and December 2003 were included for analysis. Patients with Richter's transformation were excluded. We analyzed the impact of pre-treatment characteristics (Table 1) and response duration following FCR on responses and survival after salvage therapy. Response outcomes were analyzed using 1996 National Cancer Institute response criteria. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Of 300 patients treated with first-line FCR, 111 patients (37%) have required salvage therapy. Median age at relapse was 61 years, and 36% of patients had Rai stage III or IV disease (Table 1). The salvage regimen included antibody alone, chemoimmunotherapy, or novel therapeutic approaches including lenalidomide. Responses included 17% CR, 12% nodular PR, and 32% PR with an overall response (OR) of 60%. Median OS was 38 months, and median TTF was 9 months. Rai stage III/IV disease, β2M &gt; 4 mg/L, deletion of 17p by fluorescence in situ hybridization and TTF &lt; 12 months following FCR were associated with significantly shorter TTF and OS following first salvage. Patients treated with single-antibody therapy had low response rates (CR/nPR, 9%; OR, 44%) and short TTF (6 months). Combination of alemtuzumab and rituximab improved responses (CR/nPR, 50%; OR, 75%) but did not improve TTF (8 months). Patients treated with FCR or CFAR (cyclophosphamide/fludarabine/alemtuzumab/rituximab) demonstrated good responses (CR/nPR, 50%; OR, 83%) with improved TTF (20 months) but no significant improvement in OS (44 months) compared to patients receiving antibody only (OS, 41 months). Patients who relapse after FCR can be successfully retreated with a similar chemoimmunotherapy regimen (FCR, CFAR) with reasonable response rates and remission duration; however, chemoimmunotherapy does not appear to improve OS over antibody therapy alone in first salvage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100272,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLM.2009.n.101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of First Salvage Therapy in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Relapsing After First-line Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Badoux,&nbsp;Constantine Tam,&nbsp;Susan Lerner,&nbsp;William Wierda,&nbsp;Michael J. Keating\",\"doi\":\"10.3816/CLM.2009.n.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patients receiving salvage therapy for relapsed CLL following first-line FCR have overall response rates of 60% and median survival of 38 months. We describe pre-treatment characteristics predicting for outcome after salvage therapies. Patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy had better response rates and duration compared to antibody therapy alone.</p></div><div><h3>Brief Abstract</h3><p>Chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) is an effective initial therapy with an estimated 40% relapse rate at 6 years. There is no consensus salvage therapy for relapsed patients. All patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who relapsed or were refractory following first-line FCR administered between July 1999 and December 2003 were included for analysis. Patients with Richter's transformation were excluded. We analyzed the impact of pre-treatment characteristics (Table 1) and response duration following FCR on responses and survival after salvage therapy. Response outcomes were analyzed using 1996 National Cancer Institute response criteria. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Of 300 patients treated with first-line FCR, 111 patients (37%) have required salvage therapy. Median age at relapse was 61 years, and 36% of patients had Rai stage III or IV disease (Table 1). The salvage regimen included antibody alone, chemoimmunotherapy, or novel therapeutic approaches including lenalidomide. Responses included 17% CR, 12% nodular PR, and 32% PR with an overall response (OR) of 60%. Median OS was 38 months, and median TTF was 9 months. Rai stage III/IV disease, β2M &gt; 4 mg/L, deletion of 17p by fluorescence in situ hybridization and TTF &lt; 12 months following FCR were associated with significantly shorter TTF and OS following first salvage. Patients treated with single-antibody therapy had low response rates (CR/nPR, 9%; OR, 44%) and short TTF (6 months). Combination of alemtuzumab and rituximab improved responses (CR/nPR, 50%; OR, 75%) but did not improve TTF (8 months). Patients treated with FCR or CFAR (cyclophosphamide/fludarabine/alemtuzumab/rituximab) demonstrated good responses (CR/nPR, 50%; OR, 83%) with improved TTF (20 months) but no significant improvement in OS (44 months) compared to patients receiving antibody only (OS, 41 months). Patients who relapse after FCR can be successfully retreated with a similar chemoimmunotherapy regimen (FCR, CFAR) with reasonable response rates and remission duration; however, chemoimmunotherapy does not appear to improve OS over antibody therapy alone in first salvage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLM.2009.n.101\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155791901170052X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155791901170052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一线FCR后接受挽救性治疗的复发性CLL患者总有效率为60%,中位生存期为38个月。我们描述了治疗前的特征预测挽救治疗后的结果。与单独的抗体治疗相比,接受化学免疫治疗的患者有更好的应答率和持续时间。摘要氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗(FCR)的化学免疫治疗是一种有效的初始治疗,估计6年复发率为40%。对于复发患者的抢救治疗尚无共识。所有在1999年7月至2003年12月接受一线FCR治疗后复发或难治性慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者纳入分析。排除有里希特氏变的患者。我们分析了治疗前特征(表1)和FCR后的反应时间对挽救治疗后的反应和生存的影响。应答结果采用1996年美国国家癌症研究所应答标准进行分析。采用Kaplan和Meier法计算总生存期(OS)和治疗失败时间(TTF)。在300名接受一线FCR治疗的患者中,111名患者(37%)需要补救性治疗。复发时的中位年龄为61岁,36%的患者为Rai III期或IV期疾病(表1)。挽救方案包括单独抗体、化学免疫治疗或新治疗方法,包括来那度胺。缓解包括17%的CR, 12%的结节性PR和32%的PR,总缓解(OR)为60%。中位OS为38个月,中位TTF为9个月。Rai III/IV期疾病,β2M >4 mg/L,荧光原位杂交和TTF <法缺失17p;FCR后12个月,首次抢救后TTF和OS显著缩短。接受单抗体治疗的患者应答率较低(CR/nPR, 9%;OR(44%)和较短的TTF(6个月)。阿仑单抗联合利妥昔单抗可改善疗效(CR/nPR, 50%;OR为75%),但未改善TTF(8个月)。接受FCR或CFAR(环磷酰胺/氟达拉滨/阿仑单抗/利妥昔单抗)治疗的患者表现出良好的反应(CR/nPR, 50%;OR(83%)改善了TTF(20个月),但与仅接受抗体(OS, 41个月)的患者相比,OS(44个月)没有显著改善。FCR后复发的患者可以通过类似的化学免疫治疗方案(FCR, CFAR)成功地消退,具有合理的缓解率和缓解持续时间;然而,在首次抢救中,化学免疫疗法似乎并没有比单独抗体治疗改善OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome of First Salvage Therapy in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Relapsing After First-line Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab

Patients receiving salvage therapy for relapsed CLL following first-line FCR have overall response rates of 60% and median survival of 38 months. We describe pre-treatment characteristics predicting for outcome after salvage therapies. Patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy had better response rates and duration compared to antibody therapy alone.

Brief Abstract

Chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) is an effective initial therapy with an estimated 40% relapse rate at 6 years. There is no consensus salvage therapy for relapsed patients. All patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who relapsed or were refractory following first-line FCR administered between July 1999 and December 2003 were included for analysis. Patients with Richter's transformation were excluded. We analyzed the impact of pre-treatment characteristics (Table 1) and response duration following FCR on responses and survival after salvage therapy. Response outcomes were analyzed using 1996 National Cancer Institute response criteria. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Of 300 patients treated with first-line FCR, 111 patients (37%) have required salvage therapy. Median age at relapse was 61 years, and 36% of patients had Rai stage III or IV disease (Table 1). The salvage regimen included antibody alone, chemoimmunotherapy, or novel therapeutic approaches including lenalidomide. Responses included 17% CR, 12% nodular PR, and 32% PR with an overall response (OR) of 60%. Median OS was 38 months, and median TTF was 9 months. Rai stage III/IV disease, β2M > 4 mg/L, deletion of 17p by fluorescence in situ hybridization and TTF < 12 months following FCR were associated with significantly shorter TTF and OS following first salvage. Patients treated with single-antibody therapy had low response rates (CR/nPR, 9%; OR, 44%) and short TTF (6 months). Combination of alemtuzumab and rituximab improved responses (CR/nPR, 50%; OR, 75%) but did not improve TTF (8 months). Patients treated with FCR or CFAR (cyclophosphamide/fludarabine/alemtuzumab/rituximab) demonstrated good responses (CR/nPR, 50%; OR, 83%) with improved TTF (20 months) but no significant improvement in OS (44 months) compared to patients receiving antibody only (OS, 41 months). Patients who relapse after FCR can be successfully retreated with a similar chemoimmunotherapy regimen (FCR, CFAR) with reasonable response rates and remission duration; however, chemoimmunotherapy does not appear to improve OS over antibody therapy alone in first salvage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bing-Neel Syndrome: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options The Next Generation of Therapies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Go Now? Standard Management of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Brazilian Experience Using High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1