{"title":"丹增和工具开发对研究效率的重要性","authors":"Márton Kovács, A. Holcombe, F. Aust, B. Aczel","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/m4za9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The way science is done is changing. While some tools are facilitating this change, others lag behind. The resulting mismatch between tools and researchers’ workflows can be inefficient and delay the progress of research. As an example, information about the people associated with a published journal article was traditionally handled manually and unsystematically. However, as large-scale collaboration, sometimes referred to as “team science”, is now common, a more structured and easy-to-automate approach to managing meta-data is required. In the present paper, we describe how the latest version of tenzing (Holcombe et al., 2020) helps researchers collect and structure contributor information efficiently and without frustration. Using tenzing as an example, we discuss the importance of efficient tools to reforming science and our experience with tool development as researchers.","PeriodicalId":39698,"journal":{"name":"Information Services and Use","volume":"25 1","pages":"123-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tenzing and the importance of tool development for research efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Márton Kovács, A. Holcombe, F. Aust, B. Aczel\",\"doi\":\"10.31222/osf.io/m4za9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The way science is done is changing. While some tools are facilitating this change, others lag behind. The resulting mismatch between tools and researchers’ workflows can be inefficient and delay the progress of research. As an example, information about the people associated with a published journal article was traditionally handled manually and unsystematically. However, as large-scale collaboration, sometimes referred to as “team science”, is now common, a more structured and easy-to-automate approach to managing meta-data is required. In the present paper, we describe how the latest version of tenzing (Holcombe et al., 2020) helps researchers collect and structure contributor information efficiently and without frustration. Using tenzing as an example, we discuss the importance of efficient tools to reforming science and our experience with tool development as researchers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Services and Use\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"123-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Services and Use\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/m4za9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Services and Use","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/m4za9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
科学研究的方式正在改变。虽然一些工具正在促进这种变化,但其他工具却落后了。工具和研究人员的工作流程之间的不匹配会导致效率低下,并延迟研究的进展。例如,与发表的期刊文章相关的人的信息传统上是手工和非系统地处理的。然而,随着大规模协作(有时被称为“团队科学”)的普及,需要一种更加结构化和易于自动化的方法来管理元数据。在本文中,我们描述了最新版本的tenzing (Holcombe et al., 2020)如何帮助研究人员有效且无挫折地收集和构建贡献者信息。以tenzing为例,我们讨论了高效工具对科学改革的重要性以及我们作为研究人员在工具开发方面的经验。
Tenzing and the importance of tool development for research efficiency
The way science is done is changing. While some tools are facilitating this change, others lag behind. The resulting mismatch between tools and researchers’ workflows can be inefficient and delay the progress of research. As an example, information about the people associated with a published journal article was traditionally handled manually and unsystematically. However, as large-scale collaboration, sometimes referred to as “team science”, is now common, a more structured and easy-to-automate approach to managing meta-data is required. In the present paper, we describe how the latest version of tenzing (Holcombe et al., 2020) helps researchers collect and structure contributor information efficiently and without frustration. Using tenzing as an example, we discuss the importance of efficient tools to reforming science and our experience with tool development as researchers.
期刊介绍:
Information Services & Use is an information and information technology oriented publication with a wide scope of subject matters. International in terms of both audience and authorship, the journal aims at leaders in information management and applications in an attempt to keep them fully informed of fast-moving developments in fields such as: online systems, offline systems, electronic publishing, library automation, education and training, word processing and telecommunications. These areas are treated not only in general, but also in specific contexts; applications to business and scientific fields are sought so that a balanced view is offered to the reader.