间隔减积手术前对新辅助化疗的反应预测和反应者与无反应者的比较结果

Levy Michal, M. Joseph, Boaz Mona, Wandel Ayelet, Mizrachi Yossi, Levy Tally
{"title":"间隔减积手术前对新辅助化疗的反应预测和反应者与无反应者的比较结果","authors":"Levy Michal, M. Joseph, Boaz Mona, Wandel Ayelet, Mizrachi Yossi, Levy Tally","doi":"10.23937/2378-3419/1410098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Neoajuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) followed by Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS) is an acceptable therapeutic approach for selected patients with advanced stage Ovarian Carcinoma (OvC) and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma (PPC) patients. Our aim was to assess whether the combined presence of reduction of the diameter of the largest tumor mass and of the CA125 level predict response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT). Material and methods: Clinicopathological data were abstracted from medical records of consecutive OvC and PPC patients who received paclitaxel + carboplatin NACT and underwent IDS. Computed tomography (CT) images before NACT and prior to IDS where compared. Response to NACT prior to IDS was determined according to the combined presence of two parameters: 1. Reduction in the greatest diameter of the largest CT tumor mass by 50% and 2. Reduction of the CA 125 level to ≤ 75 U/ml. No response was determined when both of these parameters where not observed. Results: Of 50 study group patients 10 (20.0%) had a response and 40 (80.0%) had no response to NACT. Optimal debulking (< 1 cm) was achieved in all responders and in 92.5% of nonresponders. The median progression free survival was similar in responders and nonresponders. The Overall Survival (OS) was 62.2% in responders and 22.6% in nonresponders (p = 0.40). The median OS was 51 months in the nonresponders and was not reached by responders. Conclusion: The proposed method of response prediction to NACT is simple and seems to identify patients who have a poor outcome after IDS.","PeriodicalId":13873,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response Prediction to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Prior to Interval Debulking Surgery and the Outcome of Responders Compared to Nonresponders\",\"authors\":\"Levy Michal, M. Joseph, Boaz Mona, Wandel Ayelet, Mizrachi Yossi, Levy Tally\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-3419/1410098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Neoajuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) followed by Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS) is an acceptable therapeutic approach for selected patients with advanced stage Ovarian Carcinoma (OvC) and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma (PPC) patients. Our aim was to assess whether the combined presence of reduction of the diameter of the largest tumor mass and of the CA125 level predict response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT). Material and methods: Clinicopathological data were abstracted from medical records of consecutive OvC and PPC patients who received paclitaxel + carboplatin NACT and underwent IDS. Computed tomography (CT) images before NACT and prior to IDS where compared. Response to NACT prior to IDS was determined according to the combined presence of two parameters: 1. Reduction in the greatest diameter of the largest CT tumor mass by 50% and 2. Reduction of the CA 125 level to ≤ 75 U/ml. No response was determined when both of these parameters where not observed. Results: Of 50 study group patients 10 (20.0%) had a response and 40 (80.0%) had no response to NACT. Optimal debulking (< 1 cm) was achieved in all responders and in 92.5% of nonresponders. The median progression free survival was similar in responders and nonresponders. The Overall Survival (OS) was 62.2% in responders and 22.6% in nonresponders (p = 0.40). The median OS was 51 months in the nonresponders and was not reached by responders. Conclusion: The proposed method of response prediction to NACT is simple and seems to identify patients who have a poor outcome after IDS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cancer and clinical research\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cancer and clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新辅助化疗(NACT)加间隔减体积手术(IDS)是晚期卵巢癌(OvC)和原发性腹膜癌(PPC)患者的一种可接受的治疗方法。我们的目的是评估最大肿瘤直径缩小和CA125水平的联合存在是否预测对新辅助化疗(NACT)的反应。材料与方法:从连续接受紫杉醇+卡铂NACT并行IDS的OvC和PPC患者病历中提取临床病理资料。比较了NACT前和IDS前的CT图像。根据两个参数的联合存在来确定IDS前对NACT的响应:1。最大的CT肿瘤肿块最大直径缩小50%和2。ca125降至≤75 U/ml。当没有观察到这两个参数时,没有确定响应。结果:50例研究组患者中,10例(20.0%)对NACT有反应,40例(80.0%)无反应。所有应答者和92.5%的无应答者均达到最佳减体积(< 1 cm)。应答者和无应答者的中位无进展生存期相似。总生存率(OS)反应者为62.2%,无反应者为22.6% (p = 0.40)。无应答者的中位生存期为51个月,应答者没有达到。结论:提出的NACT反应预测方法简单,似乎可以识别IDS后预后不良的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response Prediction to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Prior to Interval Debulking Surgery and the Outcome of Responders Compared to Nonresponders
Introduction: Neoajuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) followed by Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS) is an acceptable therapeutic approach for selected patients with advanced stage Ovarian Carcinoma (OvC) and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma (PPC) patients. Our aim was to assess whether the combined presence of reduction of the diameter of the largest tumor mass and of the CA125 level predict response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT). Material and methods: Clinicopathological data were abstracted from medical records of consecutive OvC and PPC patients who received paclitaxel + carboplatin NACT and underwent IDS. Computed tomography (CT) images before NACT and prior to IDS where compared. Response to NACT prior to IDS was determined according to the combined presence of two parameters: 1. Reduction in the greatest diameter of the largest CT tumor mass by 50% and 2. Reduction of the CA 125 level to ≤ 75 U/ml. No response was determined when both of these parameters where not observed. Results: Of 50 study group patients 10 (20.0%) had a response and 40 (80.0%) had no response to NACT. Optimal debulking (< 1 cm) was achieved in all responders and in 92.5% of nonresponders. The median progression free survival was similar in responders and nonresponders. The Overall Survival (OS) was 62.2% in responders and 22.6% in nonresponders (p = 0.40). The median OS was 51 months in the nonresponders and was not reached by responders. Conclusion: The proposed method of response prediction to NACT is simple and seems to identify patients who have a poor outcome after IDS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Study of Penile Cancer in Northeast Brazil Punicic Acid Inhibits Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in Human MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy vs. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Dosimetric Study Alterations of Serum Lipids Profiles in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers Intercalary Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Long Bone Defects of the Lower Extremity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1