糖尿病诊断标准的演变与未来

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of The Korean Medical Association Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.5124/jkma.2023.66.7.409
E. Rhee
{"title":"糖尿病诊断标准的演变与未来","authors":"E. Rhee","doi":"10.5124/jkma.2023.66.7.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus have evolved over time, taking into account new evidence. Here, the author would like to review the evolution of diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus, the current diagnostic criteria, and future perspectives.Current Concepts: For the first time, in 1965, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that a 2-hour plasma glucose concentration of 130 mg/dL or more after taking a 50-g or 100-g oral glucose bolus may be used to make the diagnosis in people younger than 45 years and that other clinical data might be used to make the diagnosis in people older than 45 years. The 2003 American Diabetes Association Diagnostic Criteria set the threshold for normal fasting glucose at 100 mg/dL. The International Expert Committee (IEC) in 2009, the American Diabetes Association in 2010, and the WHO in 2011 proposed new diagnostic criteria for diabetes: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.5% or higher. More recently, diabetes has been diagnosed via a fasting blood glucose of 126 mg/dL or higher after fasting for at least 8 hours, a 2-hour postprandial blood glucose of 200 mg/dL or higher, glycated hemoglobin of 6.5% or higher, or a random blood glucose of 200 mg/dL or higher with symptoms of hyperglycemia.Discussion and Conclusion: Further research is needed on the accuracy of other markers, such as HbA1c, fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglusitol, in the diagnosis of diabetes, and sufficient evidence is required to determine whether it is appropriate to use the same diagnostic criteria for diabetes in aged people and different ethnic groups.","PeriodicalId":17300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Medical Association","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evolution and future of diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus\",\"authors\":\"E. Rhee\",\"doi\":\"10.5124/jkma.2023.66.7.409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus have evolved over time, taking into account new evidence. Here, the author would like to review the evolution of diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus, the current diagnostic criteria, and future perspectives.Current Concepts: For the first time, in 1965, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that a 2-hour plasma glucose concentration of 130 mg/dL or more after taking a 50-g or 100-g oral glucose bolus may be used to make the diagnosis in people younger than 45 years and that other clinical data might be used to make the diagnosis in people older than 45 years. The 2003 American Diabetes Association Diagnostic Criteria set the threshold for normal fasting glucose at 100 mg/dL. The International Expert Committee (IEC) in 2009, the American Diabetes Association in 2010, and the WHO in 2011 proposed new diagnostic criteria for diabetes: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.5% or higher. More recently, diabetes has been diagnosed via a fasting blood glucose of 126 mg/dL or higher after fasting for at least 8 hours, a 2-hour postprandial blood glucose of 200 mg/dL or higher, glycated hemoglobin of 6.5% or higher, or a random blood glucose of 200 mg/dL or higher with symptoms of hyperglycemia.Discussion and Conclusion: Further research is needed on the accuracy of other markers, such as HbA1c, fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglusitol, in the diagnosis of diabetes, and sufficient evidence is required to determine whether it is appropriate to use the same diagnostic criteria for diabetes in aged people and different ethnic groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Korean Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Korean Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2023.66.7.409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2023.66.7.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到新的证据,糖尿病的诊断标准随着时间的推移而发展。本文就糖尿病诊断标准的发展、目前的诊断标准及未来的展望作一综述。当前概念:1965年,世界卫生组织(WHO)首次建议,45岁以下的患者在服用50 g或100 g口服葡萄糖后2小时血浆葡萄糖浓度为130 mg/dL或更高可用于诊断,而45岁以上的患者可用于诊断其他临床数据。2003年美国糖尿病协会诊断标准将正常空腹血糖的阈值设定为100mg /dL。国际专家委员会(IEC)在2009年,美国糖尿病协会在2010年,世界卫生组织在2011年提出了新的糖尿病诊断标准:糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)达到6.5%或更高。最近,通过禁食至少8小时后空腹血糖126 mg/dL或更高,餐后2小时血糖200 mg/dL或更高,糖化血红蛋白6.5%或更高,或随机血糖200 mg/dL或更高并伴有高血糖症状,可以诊断为糖尿病。讨论与结论:HbA1c、果糖胺、1,5-无水葡萄糖醇等其他标志物诊断糖尿病的准确性有待进一步研究,需要有充分的证据来确定在不同年龄人群和不同民族的糖尿病中使用相同的诊断标准是否合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The evolution and future of diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus
Background: The diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus have evolved over time, taking into account new evidence. Here, the author would like to review the evolution of diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus, the current diagnostic criteria, and future perspectives.Current Concepts: For the first time, in 1965, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that a 2-hour plasma glucose concentration of 130 mg/dL or more after taking a 50-g or 100-g oral glucose bolus may be used to make the diagnosis in people younger than 45 years and that other clinical data might be used to make the diagnosis in people older than 45 years. The 2003 American Diabetes Association Diagnostic Criteria set the threshold for normal fasting glucose at 100 mg/dL. The International Expert Committee (IEC) in 2009, the American Diabetes Association in 2010, and the WHO in 2011 proposed new diagnostic criteria for diabetes: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.5% or higher. More recently, diabetes has been diagnosed via a fasting blood glucose of 126 mg/dL or higher after fasting for at least 8 hours, a 2-hour postprandial blood glucose of 200 mg/dL or higher, glycated hemoglobin of 6.5% or higher, or a random blood glucose of 200 mg/dL or higher with symptoms of hyperglycemia.Discussion and Conclusion: Further research is needed on the accuracy of other markers, such as HbA1c, fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglusitol, in the diagnosis of diabetes, and sufficient evidence is required to determine whether it is appropriate to use the same diagnostic criteria for diabetes in aged people and different ethnic groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The Korean Medical Association
Journal of The Korean Medical Association Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Korean Medical Association (JKMA) is the official peer-reviewed, open-access, monthly journal of the Korean Medical Association (KMA). It contains articles in Korean or English. Its abbreviated title is ''J Korean Med Assoc''. The aims of the Journal include contributing to the treatment of and preventing diseases of public health importance and to improvement of health and quality of life through sharing the state-of the-art scientific information on medicine by the members of KMA and other national and international societies.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus complex pulmonary disease Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of scabies Current status of scabies in Korea Principles for effective management of scabies outbreaks Problems and improvements in the Medical Law’s excessive regulation of physicians in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1